Can you answer the question?
Kk..
there are powers in this age that we must resist. These powers are too
strong for us because they come from places that are beyond our power to
overcome. They come from high places. We must see that we are caught in
between this great battle that is going on until Christ will have
chained the devil ... his angels and demons into an eternal hell...
along with the devils children. Because all the children who are not
adopted by God have Satan as their father. That means they are used by
satan to oppose God and His kingdom. We do not have a completed
salvation by past victories. But we are being renewed in the inner man
and we are promised that Satan and his children cannot destroy our
souls. Even tho we face a formattable enemy and a realistic threat to
our well being in this world we are more than conquerors through Christ.
Greater is He that is in you than he that is in the world. But
we are cast down to be desperate in this world. Naturally we do not want
to suffer at the hands of the enemy. This natural desire to live a long
life and our new trust in Christ work together to sustain us in our
most fiercest trials. Because we are being opposed as a general
misunderstanding of our position that every person who is following the
course of this world desires to succeed in this world. Because we know
the real way to succeed in this world. I mean the way of hardship and
multiple presuppositions about individual circumstances. We have a God
who measures things in increments that we could never fathom.Our safety
is in knowing the ways of God. We grow as we become aware of just how
small things that God designs create big results. God knows the secrets
of mens hearts and He turns them where ever He wills. Just like the
flowing of a stream. This is how we grow in our discernment.
Because we translate unseen things into a communication of reality. He
says my sheep hear my voice and they follow me. Most of this
communication to our minds is through meditation and illumination. The
more we grow in our listening to God the more we are going to find
greater opposition. Because God communicates what He is secretly doing
in mens hearts and He gives us the message to give to them. Gods ways
are always to regenerate and bring life to a man. God has made it so
that we do not always understand what He is doing even tho we have heard
to do it. This way of encouragement is directed to stir up the
spiritual gift in men so that they will focus on the rite things. We are
not the go between men and Christ. This is why we must find all
of our security in God. We are not like the world who seeks after
things that are fleeting. But we seek after wisdom. Wisdom is better
than gold. Wisdom is greater than riches. Because wisdom plums into the
inner man and frees a man to serve God in an open and free spirit of
rejoicing. Wisdom causes a man to give up everything and lose this world
to gain Christ. Because Christ is the only real means of living this
quality of life. We are miserable without Christ. There is no in between
in this reality. There is only punishment for the wicked or
unfathomable joy and rejoicing for those who find all of their
confidence in Christ.
|
3303
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: CHAPTER 3. - REGENERATION BY FAITH. OF REPENTANCE: CALVIN
|
on: June 19, 2010, 03:09:49 PM
|
16. We can now understand what are the fruits
of repentance—viz. offices of piety towards God, and love towards men,
general holiness 522and purity of life. In short, the more a man studies
to conform his life to the standard of the divine law, the surer signs
he gives of his repentance. Accordingly, the Spirit, in exhorting us to
repentance, brings before us at one time each separate precept of the
law; at another the duties of the second table; although there are also
passages in which, after condemning impurity in its fountain in the
heart, he afterwards descends to external marks, by which repentance is
proved to be sincere. A portraiture of this I will shortly set before
the eye of the reader when I come to describe the Christian life (infra,
chapter 6) I will not here collect the passages from the prophets in
which they deride the frivolous observances of those who labour to
appease God with ceremonies, and show that they are mere mockery; or
those in which they show that outward integrity of conduct is not the
chief part of repentance, seeing that God looks at the heart. Any one
moderately versant in Scripture will understand by himself, without
being reminded by others, that when he has to do with God, nothing is
gained without beginning with the internal affections of the heart.
There is a passage of Joel which will avail not a little for the
understanding of others: “Rend your heart, and not your garments,” (Joel
2:13). Both are also briefly expressed by James in these words:
“Cleanse your hands, ye sinners; and purify your hearts, ye
double-minded,” (James 4:  .
Here, indeed, the accessory is set down first; but the source and
principle is afterwards pointed out—viz. that hidden defilements must be
wiped away, and an altar erected to God in the very heart. There are,
moreover, certain external exercises which we employ in private as
remedies to humble us and tame our flesh, and in public, to testify our
repentance. These have their origin in that revenge of which Paul speaks
(2 Cor. 7:2), for when the mind is distressed, it naturally expresses
itself in sackcloth, groans, and tears, shuns ornament and every kind of
show, and abandons all delights. Then he who feels how great an evil
the rebellion of the flesh is, tries every means of curbing it. Besides,
he who considers aright how grievous a thing it is to have offended the
justice of God, cannot rest until, in his humility, he have given glory
to God. Such exercises are often mentioned by ancient writers when they
speak of the fruits of repentance. But although they by no means place
the power of repentance in them, yet my readers must pardon me for
saying what I think—they certainly seem to insist on them more than is
right. Any one who judiciously considers the matter will,
I trust, agree with me that they have exceeded in two ways; first, by
so strongly urging and extravagantly commending that corporal
discipline, they indeed succeeded in making the people embrace it with
greater zeal; but they in a manner obscured what they should have
regarded as of much more serious moment. Secondly, the inflictions which
they enjoined were considerably more rigorous than ecclesiastical
mildness demands, as will be elsewhere shown.
|
Remove
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3304
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Christian Supernaturalism: Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield
|
on: June 19, 2010, 03:02:38 PM
|
|
The divine immanence is a fact to the
Christian man. But to the Christian man this fact of the divine
immanence is not the ultimate expression of his conception of God. Its
recognition does not operate for him as a limitation of God in being or
activities; it does not result in enclosing Him within His works and
confining the possibilities of His action to the capacities of their
laws. It is rather the expression of the Christian's sense of the
comparative littleness of the universe - to every part and activity of
which God is present because the whole universe is to Him as the mustard
seed lying in the palm of a man. An immanent God, yes: but what is His
immanence in even this immense universe to a God like ours? God in
nature, yes: but what is God in nature to the inconceivable vastness of
the God above nature? To the Christian conception, so far is the
immanent God from exhausting the idea of God, that it touches but the
skirt of His garment. It is only when we rise above the divine immanence
to catch some faint glimpse of the God that transcends all the works of
His hands - to the truly supernatural God - that we begin to know who
and what the Christian God is. Let us say, then, with all the emphasis
that we are capable of, that the Christian's God is before all else the
transcendent God - a God so great that though He be truly the supporter
of this whole universe as well as its maker, yet His activity as ground
of existence and governor of all that moves, is as nothing to that
greater activity which is His apart from and above what is to us the
infinite universe but to Him an infinitesimal speck of being that cannot
in any way control His life. The Christian's God is no doubt the God of
nature and the God in nature: but before and above all this He is the
God above nature - the Supernatural Fact. As Christian men we must see
to it that we retain a worthy conception of God: and an exclusively
immanent God is, after all, a very little and belittling notion to hold
of Him the product of whose simple word all this universe is.
II.
The Christian man, again, must needs most frankly and heartily believe
in the supernatural act. Belief in the supernatural act is, indeed,
necessarily included in belief in the supernatural fact. If immanence is
an inadequate formula for the being of God, it is equally inadequate as
a formula for His activities. For where God is, there He must act: and
if He exists above and beyond nature He must act also above and beyond
nature. The supernatural God cannot but be conceived as a supernatural
actor. He who called nature into being by a word cannot possibly be
subject to the creature of His will in the mode of His activities. He to
whom all nature is but a speck of derived and dependent being cannot be
thought of as, in the reach of His operations, bound within the limits
of the laws which operate within this granule and hold it together.
|
Remove
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3305
|
Forums / Key Life Forum / Re: Whoppers: Lie of trying harder
|
on: June 19, 2010, 02:37:58 PM
|
mbG: "This is why the christian life is 70 percent questions and 10 percent answers."
K_k:
It's been a long while since i majored in math, but i would say that,
of all people, Believers in the Living and the Written Word have a very
high percentage of answers. You yourself gave some of the important
ones that doubters don't have.
mbG: "It means that we start with
God being God. God getting the glory... God inhabiting all the
universe. God loving eternally. It is God coming down..."
K_k: What are some of the things Christians know?
We
know where we came from, Whose we are, where we are going and Who with,
what is the nature of true love, how to find peace and rest for our
souls, how to get a brand new nature, how to find God, how to serve Him
as we keep finding Him, how to have a successful marriage and
friendships, who and what to avoid, what is expected of us, which are
the most important rules to live by, Who is the only power we can turn
to in order to live a righteous life, where will the final Heaven be and
what will it look like, where will the "lost" be in the End and what
will that look like, when will evil and sin and suffering and death and
disease ever stop, are there really angels, what's the most reliable
early history of the earth and mankind, was there a worldwide flood that
explains much of geology and geography, who are God's people and how
did they come to be called that, Who was Jesus really, how should we
pray, is healing available, how to deal with emotions, what to be afraid
of and how to let go of fear, will God actually come to live inside us
right now, how much can we trust the Book of Books, and a few hundred
thousand additional things found in Scripture (like Who/what is the
Truth, the Way to God, the Life that never ends).
Other than that, Believers don't have many answers that doubters don't also have.
I
agree Kk... all of these points are just secondary to and are not
necessarily understood by everyone in an equal way. Because wisdom comes
directly from God through His word. We can know all the facts but not
know how to apply them or be able to discern who is telling us the rite
way to go. Because we believe that no man has the proper solution by the
facts alone. Because we are not robots. We believe that because God is
able and we are not that His ways are direct and sufficient. This is why
there is no other solution to our problems than to gain knowledge from
His word and to seek wisdom from Him. We have been given the
Spirit who teaches us along the way. All of these things come to us from
God by His method of teaching us through the illumination of the Spirit
who communicates with us so that we gain spiritual understanding. We go
beyond the mere principles and we discern the spirit of a man. We know
that God looks on the heart and man looks at the outward appearance. So
that a proper application in all of this is focused on the attitude of a
man not necessarily his accomplishments. God is all glorious.
He reigns above the earth. His footstool is the earth. He opposes men
who are proud and who do not think His thoughts. Those men oppose His
sheep. So that we are in need of continuous teaching and defense or we
would be swallowed up in their schemes. The reason i am saying this is
because we live in a world that is upside down. So it is not just a
matter of agreeing on some christian principles. This is a matter of who
has control of what. Because we know that men use God to bring other
men under their dominance. So we need to be wise as serpents and
harmless as doves. God is mighty to save. He will lead us in
the path of peace. He will keep us from the hands of evil men. He will
provide our daily needs... he will not let us go hungry. Because God
owns the cattle on a thousand hills. And since we belong to Christ who
has been given authority over all things ... we inherit everything that
Christ has been given. We are no longer slaves but we are brothers and
rulers in the new heaven and earth. Because we look into these things
that are glorious. We are seeking the face of Christ who shines in all
of His glory as He lights up the whole earth. If the glory of God were
seen by us we would be dissipated in a second. But God is gracious and
even tho His glory is all around us we are saved from the brightness of
that glory. And yet we get a glimpse of the brightness of His glory when
we look on Christ. This is the Spirits work in our hearts who
warms us as we behold the glory of Christ. Here we are worshiping and
then we are made to look up... we see the ceiling but there are heavenly
host that we cannot see. Its as if we were in the Sistine chapel and we
looked up and saw the paintings. But this is much brighter and more
clear... clearer than anything we could imagine...more colorful than
anything we could see. Yes this is the reality of Gods glory. There is a
sense in which God comes down and we are made aware of something. We
muse and then we ponder . We then have a sense of something that is
greater than we could ever imagine. God coming down and nothing else
matters.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3309
|
Forums / Politics Forum / Re: The incredible shrinking economy
|
on: June 18, 2010, 02:48:29 AM
|
|
RUSH: Now, I have been promising all week --
well, since Tuesday -- to share with you a column Art Laffer wrote,
published June 7th in the Wall Street Journal. And I want to start this
hour with the column because if there's one thing that you want to bone
up on as the future is prepared to unfold before your very eyes it
would be the information here in Art Laffer's piece. The headline is:
"Tax Hikes and the 2011 Economic Collapse -- Today's corporate profits
reflect an income shift into 2010. These profits will tumble next year,
preceded most likely by the stock market. People can change the volume,
the location and the composition of their income, and they can do so in
response to changes in government policies. It shouldn't surprise
anyone that the nine states without an income tax are growing far faster
and attracting more people than are the nine states with the highest
income tax rates. People and businesses change the location of income
based on incentives.
"Likewise, who is gobsmacked when they are
told that the two wealthiest Americans -- Bill Gates and Warren Buffett
-- hold the bulk of their wealth in the nontaxed form of unrealized
capital gains?" Let me repeat this. "Who is gobsmacked when they are
told that the two wealthiest Americans -- Bill Gates and Warren Buffett
-- hold the bulk of their wealth in the nontaxed form of unrealized
capital gains? The composition of wealth also responds to incentives.
And it's also simple enough for most people to understand that if the
government taxes people who work and pays people not to work, fewer
people will work. Incentives matter." Let me intercede here and simply
use myself as an example. I pulled the plug and left New York in 1997.
I moved out of there because I discovered that there's no state income
tax in Florida. Have you ever wondered why so many athletes claim
Florida as their residence, when they may live and work all over the
country plying their trade? It's because there's no income tax here,
there's no income tax in Florida. People say, "Yeah, but they really
nail you on the property tax." Well, they do, the property tax is
higher here, but I've run the numbers and the no income tax combined
with the property tax doesn't even get close to what I was paying in
income tax, state and city and unincorporated business tax, in New
York.
I left New York in 1997 and I have been audited every
year since I left. I have to prove where I am 14 different ways every
day of each year. And I still get audited, and they still accuse me of
lying to them about where I am on every day. I have not done this
program in New York in a year and a half. Mr. Laffer is exactly right.
And, folks, in this case, should I tell 'em what my tax rate per day is
when I work in -- I don't think I should do that. It's not the money;
it's the principle of the thing. Well, it's ridiculously high, but
that's not the point. It's the principle. If New York wants to drive
people out of the state, I will lead the way. That's the way I've
looked at it since 1997. The point is here is that Laffer is exactly
right, and his point about Gates and Buffett is the bulk of their wealth
is in the non-taxed form of unrealized capital gains. They're not
paying taxes on their wealth, contrary to what they and everybody else
want you to believe. And now Gates and Buffett met in some diner in
Omaha recently and came up with a plan. They want every billionaire to
give away half of his or her wealth, either now or at their death, give
it away to charity.
Now, I don't care what anybody does with
their money. Gates and Buffett can do whatever they want with their
money, but I draw the line at them telling everybody else what they
should do with theirs. If they have a lot guilt over having amassed
multiple billions of dollars, fine, then do with it whatever they want.
But don't take that guilt and try to spread it to everybody else,
because once you start saying that billionaires ought to give away half
of their wealth, well, then maybe everybody ought to give away half of
their wealth up to, what is the magic number, $250,000 a year. You live
your life the way you want to but leave me out of it. That goes for
money, it goes for what I use to brush my teeth, to what kind of car I
drive, to what kind of television set I buy, to whether or not I'm going
to smoke a cigar or not, whether you're around or not. So the
point is that Laffer incentives work. I'm going to tell you something
else. With these massive tax increases coming starting in 2011, that's
why I told you yesterday the airline industry reported a two and a half
billion-dollar profit this year, because they want to pay low tax rates
on that profit this year, not next year. I don't care how they got the
profit, I don't care if they got it charging for carry-ons or for bags
or what have you. And there are a lot of corporations and industries
that are gonna go ahead and report profit this year in order to pay tax
on it this year, rather than defer it. People who have the ability are
going to move as much of their income to 2010 as they can. Michael
Eisner, 1992 in December, or maybe it was '93, the month before the
Clinton retroactive tax increase went into effect that took the rate to
39%, Eisner sold $192 million worth of Disney stock -- and he had voted
for Clinton, of course -- to escape the new tax increase. And there are
going to be a lot of people, people who have the ability to shift
income, to take it earlier, whatever, they're going to do that to avoid
these new tax increases.
The point is the tax increases that
are coming are not going to raise the revenue everybody thinks. People
are going to be running away from this as fast as they can. All these
profits are going to be reported and there's going to be an economic
downturn as a result next year. "People can also change the timing of
when they earn and receive their income in response to government
policies. According to a 2004 U.S. Treasury report, 'high income
taxpayers accelerated the receipt of wages and year-end bonuses from
1993 to 1992 -- over $15 billion -- in order to avoid the effects of the
anticipated increase in the top rate from 31% to 39.6%," under Bill
Clinton. So Eisner's $192 million was part of that $15 billion. "At
the end of 1993, taxpayers shifted wages and bonuses yet again to avoid
the increase in Medicare taxes that went into effect beginning 1994."
And to give you a real life example of how this works, our old friend
the Breck Girl, John Edwards, who was always running around talking
about the poor and poverty and there's two Americas, John Edwards
organized his business under subchapter S rules. So he went sub-S.
Now,
the Medicare tax at the time was 1.9% of everything, not like the
Social Security tax which has a ceiling. I think the Medicare tax is
now 3% of everything. If you go sub-S, which is legal, don't
misunderstand, if you organize under subchapter S, let's say your entire
generated income in a year is, pick a number, 500 grand. You can pay
yourself a salary of $75,000, or $100,000 and pay Medicare and Social
Security only on that and income tax and then take the other in bonus,
which is exempt from the Medicare tax, it's salaries and wages and
Edwards did that. And everybody said, "How can you do that?" "Well,
I'm just taking advantage of the law." "But I thought you wanted the
poor people to get paid, I thought you wanted Medicare patients to get
treatment." "I do, but I don't want to pay for it." Incentives
matter.
"Just remember what happened to auto sales when the
cash for clunkers program ended. Or how about new housing sales when the
$8,000 tax credit ended? It isn't rocket surgery, as the Ivy League
professor said. On or about Jan. 1, 2011, federal, state and local tax
rates are scheduled to rise quite sharply. President George W. Bush's
tax cuts expire on that date, meaning that the highest federal personal
income tax rate will go to 39.6% from 35%, the highest federal dividend
tax rate pops up to 39.6% from 15%..." More than doubles. "...the
capital gains tax rate to 20% from 15%." Oh, that's another thing.
You're going to have a lot of people -- normally, you know, high-wealth
people will take appreciated stock and they will donate that to charity,
rather than sell it and pay the capital gains tax. But a lot of people
have been going ahead and selling stock and buying others and the
capital gains at 15%, so it's going to go to 20. So what's going to
happen, you're going to have a lot of people who will sell stock, they
will liquidate their positions in which they're holding a gain, prior to
the end of the year in order to pay a lower capital gains rate of what
Obama's new rate is starting January 1. All of this accelerated
economic activity is gonna make the end of the year look like boom
time. But at the same time, when January rolls around and the first
quarter and the second quarter hit, then, of course, there's no economic
activity because these tax increases are in full force. And people are
going to be less interested in even reporting income, they're going to
be looking for ways to shelter it or hide it so as to avoid paying these
higher rates, the people that can, and the people that can are the
people that hire you. So you have the capital gains rate's going to go
to 20% from 15, the estate tax right now is zero, it's going to go back
up to 55%. So a lot of people are probably going to die this year,
they're gonna move their death forward so that their families don't have
to pay any estate tax as opposed to next year when they would die, have
to pay 55%.
"Lots and lots of other changes will also occur as
a result of the sunset provision in the Bush tax cuts. Tax rates have
been and will be raised on income earned from off-shore investments.
Payroll taxes are already scheduled to rise in 2013 and the Alternative
Minimum Tax (AMT) will be digging deeper and deeper into middle-income
taxpayers. And there's always the celebrated tax increase on Cadillac
health care plans. State and local tax rates are also going up in 2011
as they did in 2010. Tax rate increases next year are everywhere. Now,
if people know tax rates will be higher next year than they are this
year, what will those people do this year? They will shift production
and income out of next year into this year to the extent possible. As a
result, income this year has already been inflated above where it
otherwise should be and next year, 2011, income will be lower than it
otherwise should be. Also, the prospect of rising prices, higher
interest rates and more regulations next year will further entice demand
and supply to be shifted from 2011 into 2010. In my view, this shift of
income and demand is a major reason that the economy in 2010 has
appeared as strong as it has," which ain't very strong, by the way.
"When we pass the tax boundary of Jan. 1, 2011, my best guess is that
the train goes off the tracks and we get our worst nightmare of a severe
'double dip' recession.
"In 1981, Ronald Reagan -- with
bipartisan support -- began the first phase in a series of tax cuts
passed under the Economic Recovery Tax Act (ERTA), whereby the bulk of
the tax cuts didn't take effect until Jan. 1, 1983. Reagan's delayed tax
cuts were the mirror image of President Barack Obama's delayed tax rate
increases. For 1981 and 1982 people deferred so much economic activity
that real GDP was basically flat," it contributed to that recession
because people didn't want to pay those high tax rates, they wanted to
wait around 'til '83 to report any income. "The unemployment rate rose
to well over 10%. But at the tax boundary of Jan. 1, 1983 the economy
took off like a rocket, with average real growth reaching 7.5% in 1983
and 5.5% in 1984. It has always amazed me how tax cuts don't work until
they take effect. Mr. Obama's experience with deferred tax rate
increases will be the reverse. The economy will collapse in 2011.
Consider corporate profits as a share of GDP. Today, corporate profits
as a share of GDP are way too high given the state of the U.S. economy.
These high profits reflect the shift in income into 2010 from 2011.
These profits will tumble in 2011, preceded most likely by the stock
market."
Folks, this next is key. Listen to me. Look at me.
"In 2010, without any prepayment penalties, people can cash in their
Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), Keogh deferred income accounts
and 401(k) deferred income accounts," without prepayment penalties.
"After paying their taxes, these deferred income accounts can be rolled
into Roth IRAs that provide after-tax income to their owners into the
future. Given what's going to happen to tax rates, this conversion seems
like a no-brainer." Anybody who has a decent accountant is going to be
advised to do this. It's further economic activity taken outta next
year and put into this year. "The result will be a crash in tax
receipts once the surge is past. If you thought deficits and
unemployment have been bad lately, you ain't seen nothing yet."
|
Remove
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3310
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Reformed Doctrine
|
on: June 17, 2010, 03:22:20 PM
|
mbG
quoting dictionary: "Synergism is...the [erroneous] doctrine that there
are two efficient agents in regeneration, namely the human will and the
divine Spirit, which, in the strict sense of the term, cooperate. This
theory accordingly holds that the soul has not lost in the fall all
inclination toward holiness, nor all power to seek for it under the
influence of ordinary motives...To put it simply, synergism is the
belief that faith is produced by our unregenerated human nature..."
K_k:
Synergism is erroneous. What i am saying is that there is only one
agent in regeneration, the Spirit of God. And He will not force our
wills to desire and accept Him. The soul does not have an inclination
toward holiness, but can be drawn, encouraged, inspired, enlightened,
toward receiving His holiness, or it can continue to resist Him until
the End. I do not believe "that faith is produced by our unregenerated
human nature".
mbG quoting Spurgeon: "Faith in the living God and
his Son Jesus Christ is always the result of the new birth, and can
never exist except in the regenerate. Whoever has faith is a saved man."
K-k:
The new birth is not separate from true faith in Jesus Christ. The
reception of the Gift of faith and the reception of the new regenerated
nature are two aspects of the same action. God answers our desperate
cry, which He has developed without coercion, by giving us the faith in
Him which is part of the regenerated nature. It is not "this then
this", but "this and this" simultaneously.
By resisting the Gift
of faith indefinitely, the lost are also resisting receiving the new
nature which alone has unending Life, His Life. And we would have
continued resisting ourselves if we were not weaker in our rebellion
than they. So it is not our goodness that allows us to be saved, but
rather our weakness against His wonderful persuasion.
Been to busy to respond. My
point is if we do not start with God about the ability of the will then
its synergism. As i have pointed out before that our wills prior to
salvation or prior to regeneration where at enmity with God. By doing
something in accordance with our wills we were doing the opposite of
good. Because our desires in a saving sense did not exist in us. We did
not have the nature to be willing. There was no cause for us to want
God to change us until He gave us His will. Then we willed what God
wanted. Now i am not playing with words or ideas here. We are unable
unless God makes us able. Not just in the sense of understanding what He
would have us do but the power to do it. Every thing in the christian
experience is caused from a source that is not our own. I do not
even think we can reflect on our ability to get something from God. I
mean that we must start from the premise that our desires are gifts from
God. And that sin is a foreign agent. This comes from the conviction
that salvation is a free gift and everything that we have as a cause of
finding comfort and forgiveness is from a gift. I think this is the
proper view of our new identity. This is why i do not confuse terms. We
naturally are concerned for our sin as a believer or we would not have
the basis of our wanting forgiveness. We cannot desire to avoid this
concern for our sin. Because we believe that it was a gift in the first
place. We did not obtain it through our understanding and we do not
understand in a natural way how to keep it. That is a waste of time. We
have a new identity and now we have a totally new view of our struggles.
Thats the point of the sermon on the mount... we are all of these
things and we receive blessings because that is our nature.
|
Remove
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3312
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Reformed Doctrine
|
on: June 13, 2010, 01:05:11 PM
|
|
Synergism is...the [erroneous]
doctrine that there are two efficient agents in regeneration, namely the
human will and the divine Spirit, which, in the strict sense of the
term, cooperate. This theory accordingly holds that the soul has not
lost in the fall all inclination toward holiness, nor all power to seek
for it under the influence of ordinary motives...To put it simply,
synergism is the belief that faith is produced by our unregenerated
human nature... The Century Dictionary
I say that man, before
he is renewed into the new creation of the Spirit's kingdom, does and
endeavours nothing to prepare himself for that new creation and kingdom,
and when he is re-created has does and endeavors nothing towards his
perseverance in that kingdom; but the Spirit alone works both blessings
in us, regenerating us, and preserving us when regenerate, without
ourselves... Martin Luther from Bondage of the Will pg. 268
Faith
in the living God and his Son Jesus Christ is always the result of the
new birth, and can never exist except in the regenerate. Whoever has
faith is a saved man. C.H. Spurgeon from "Faith and Regeneration"
|
Remove
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3313
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Christian Supernaturalism: Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield
|
on: June 13, 2010, 01:01:12 PM
|
|
It is certainly to be allowed that it is no
light task for a Christian man to hold his anchorage in the rush of such
a current of anti-supernaturalistic thought. We need not wonder that so
many are carried from their moorings. How shall we so firmly brace
ourselves that, as the flood of the world's thought beats upon us, it
may bring us cleansing and refreshment, but may not sweep us away from
our grasp on Christian truth? How, but by constantly reminding ourselves
of what Christianity is, and of what as Christian men we must needs
believe as to the nature and measure of the supernatural in its impact
on the life of the world? For this nature and measure of the
supernatural we have all the evidence which gives us Christianity. And
surely the mass of that evidence is far too great to be shaken by any
current of the world's thought whatever. Christian truth is a rock too
securely planted to go down before any storm. Let us attach ourselves to
it by such strong cables, and let us know so well its promontories of
vantage and secure hiding-places, that though the waters may go over us
we shall not be moved. To this end it will not be useless to recall
continually the frankness of Christianity's commitment to the absolute
supernatural. And it may be that we shall find profit in enumerating at
this time a few of the points, at least, at which, as Christian men, we
must recognize, with all heartiness, the intrusion of pure
supernaturalism into our conception of things.
I. The Christian
man, then, must, first of all, give the heartiest and frankest
recognition to the supernatural fact. "God," we call it. But it is not
enough for us to say "God." The pantheist, too, says "God," and means
this universal frame: for him accordingly the supernatural is but the
more inclusive natural. When the Christian says "God," he means, and if
he is to remain Christian he must mean, a supernatural God - a God who
is not entangled in nature, is not only another name for nature in its
coordinated activities, or for that mystery which lies beneath and
throbs through the All; but who is above nature and beyond, who existed,
the Living God, before nature was, and should nature cease to be would
still exist, the Everlasting God, and so long as this universal frame
endures exists above and outside of nature as its Lord, its Lawgiver,
and its Almighty King.
No Christian man may allow that the
universe, material and spiritual combined, call it infinite if you will,
in all its operations, be they as myriad as you choose, sums up the
being or the activities of God. Before this universe was, God was, the
one eternal One, rich in infinite activities: and while this universe
persists, outside and beyond and above it God is, the one infinite One,
ineffably rich in innumerable activities inconceivable, it may be, to
the whole universe of derived being. He is not imprisoned within His
works: the laws which He has ordained for them express indeed His
character, but do not compass the possibilities of His action. The
Apostle Paul has no doubt told us that "in Him we live and move and have
our being," but no accredited voice has declared that in the universe
He lives and moves and has His being. No, the heaven of heavens cannot
contain Him; and what He has made is to what He is only as the smallest
moisture-particle of the most attenuated vapor to the mighty expanse of
the immeasurable sea.
|
Remove
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3315
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: ETERNAL PREDESTINATION OF GOD John Calvin
|
on: June 13, 2010, 08:23:09 AM
|
|
In the first place, there is, most certainly
and evidently, an inseparable connection between the elect and the
reprobate. So that the election, of which the apostle speaks, Cannot
consist unless we confess that God separated from all others certain
persons whom it pleased Him thus to separate. Now, this act of God is
expressed by the term predestinating, which the apostle afterwards twice
repeats. He moreover calls those "chosen" (or elected) who are
engrafted by faith into the body of Christ; and that this blessing is by
no means common to all men is openly manifest. The apostle, therefore,
by the "chosen," evidently means those whom Christ condescends to call
after they have been given to Him by the Father. But, to make faith the
cause of election is altogether absurd, and utterly at variance with the
words of the apostle. "Paul does not (as Augustine wisely observes)
declare that the children of God were 'chosen,' because He foreknew they
would believe, but in order that they might believe. Nor does the
apostle (says he) call them 'chosen,' because God had foreseen that they
would be holy and without spot, but in order that they might be made
such" Again, "God did not (says he) choose us because we believed, but
in order that we might believe, lest we should appear to have first
chosen Him. Paul loudly declares that our very beginning to be holy is
the fruit and effect of election. They act most preposterously,
therefore, who put election after faith." He further observes, "When
Paul lays down, as the sole as the of election, that good pleasure of
God which He had in Himself, he excludes all other causes whatsoever."
Augustine, therefore, rightly admonishes us ever to go back to that
first great cause of election, lest we should be inclined to boast of
the good pleasure of our own will!
Paul then proceeds to declare
that "God abounded towards us in all wisdom and prudence, according to
the riches of His grace, having made known unto us the mystery of His
will, according to His good pleasure which He hath purposed in Himself."
Thou hearest in these words, reader, the grace of illumination, flowing
like a river from the fountain of that eternal counsel which had been
before hidden. Far, very far, is this removed from the idea that God had
any respect to our faith in choosing us, which faith could not possibly
have existed except that God had then appointed it for us by the free
grace of His adoption of us. And Paul farther confirms all this by
declaring that God was moved by no external cause?by no cause out of
Himself?in the choice of us; but that He Himself, in Himself, was the
cause and the author of choosing His people, not yet created or born, as
those on whom He would afterwards confer faith: "According to the
purpose of Him (saith the apostle) who worketh all things after the
counsel of His own will" (Eph. i. 11).
Who does not see that the
eternal purpose of God is here set in diametrical opposition to our own
purpose and will? This passage also was deeply weighed by Augustine,
who, in his interpretation of it, observes "that God so works out all
things, that He works also in us the very willingness by which we
believe." It is thus, I think, clearly brought out and proved who they
are whom God calls by the Gospel to the hope of salvation, whom He
engrafts into the body of Christ, and whom He makes heirs of eternal
life; that they are those whom He had adopted unto Himself by His
eternal and secret counsel to be His sons; and that he was so far from
being moved by any faith in them to come thus to adopt them, that this
His election is the cause and the beginning of all faith in them; and
that, therefore, election is, in order, before faith.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment