Monday, November 9, 2015

4912  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Who do you pray to in the Trinity? on: May 27, 2009, 12:30:12 PM
MBG - I couldn't care less whether Roy trusts me or not or what his opinion of me is.  Like I said - You're right.  I'm not  God.  Nor am I all that good.  But I AM someone who will be honest with you about where I'm coming from and what my views are.  Roy ISN'T, and he proved that to me beyond question.  If you want to trust him, that's your choice.

Back to the topic - Do you yourself really think it makes a difference to God how we address Him?  I myself believe we can pray saying, "Father", "Heavenly Father", "Lord", "Dear God", "Lord God", "Lord Jesus", "Holy Spirit", "Holy One", and they're all fine.

First of all... i want to say that i am a worse sinner than Roy... and i am indebted to him as a brother.... i was patient ... i mean i have been reading this for awhile now...

Secondly the scripture says that we must view our prayers within the Trinitarian fellowship... we are in Christ... that is we share in the Trinitarian connections and communications from our understanding of our union with Christ.... because when we learn to have fellowship with Christ in His life...we are connected to Him with eternal life... a quality of life in which we find our happiness in His glory and pleasure and not our own. But in finding Christ as the only worthy object of our faith...then we grow in our desires to please Him and we enjoy this conversation by His returning to us in that communication of a word of knowledge or gaining an insight in our trials... this is His wisdom as opposed to our natural way of thinking in this world... because He holds our reality in His understanding as our high priest being intimately acquainted with us in our particular struggle with sin. This is how we know who the Father is as He is in His eternal love for us... If we have seen the Son then we have seen the Father... this is a fail safe connection in which we are shielded from the temptations to flee and we are keep by the power of God ...knowing and experiencing His eternal love... that is guided, underguirded, strengthen in His future promises and enabled to find our comfort from this world in His fail safe refuge... We are protected from the power of the Devil....and all of this is done through the power of God the Holy Spirit who enables us to rejoice... to have a spirit of love... and  to be able to cry Abba Father ... this is who we are as we commune with God in prayer.   
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4913  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Who do you pray to in the Trinity? on: May 27, 2009, 12:08:29 PM
(shrug)  Stick away, MBG.  What I've said is from my own personal experience of Roy.  I don't trust him, and I have reason not to.   You can if you want to.


Jim

I know Roy would not trust you if a liar who was protecting his interest accused Roy of some bad behavior ... of being a bad example of your church... yes you would gladly stand as his accuser... sheep are prone to wander my friend ...you better choose sides... Grin 
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4914  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Who do you pray to in the Trinity? on: May 27, 2009, 10:39:40 AM
Roy, I have not ever set out to intentionally deceive people on this board.

You HAVE.

And the only reason you stopped doing it is because you were caught and exposed.  If you had not been caught, you'd have continued. 

And in view of that, you yourself have convinced me that your being sorry has a lot more to do with your being caught than it does with what you intentionally did. 

As for your wishing me the blessing of Shalom - In view of things, I really can't see that as being anything other than just one more example of your being disingenuous.

I don't trust you, Roy.  And I have very real reason NOT TO.

And that's just the consequence you bear that comes from what you did.

Here's hoping that you make better choices in the future.

Jim

Ive got to stick up for Roy ,,, my brother.... what has Roy done that is sooooooooo unforgivable? Jim is not god. You are welcomed here Roy! ... and bring all the other deceivers along with the fornicators,,, idolaters, adulterers, murderers and haters with you ....who have been forgiven much.... thats what this place is for... the good people can go somewhere else... 1 Samuel 22 1 David left Gath and escaped to the cave of Adullam.When his brothers and his father's household heard about it, they went down to him there. 2 All those who were in distress or in debt or discontented gathered around him, and he became their leader. About four hundred men were with him.   Wow... a man after my own heart. Grin
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4915  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Saving faith vs Intellectual ascension on: May 26, 2009, 07:24:40 PM
I have been contemplating on resting in Jesus.. with my hebrews meditation. Im not sure its the apostle who wrote this book... because i have memorized a large portion of the apostles writings. The author of this book is using the OT revelation to move his arguments along. Its probably because of the audience being jewish. But there is a train of thought and then there will be a verse that doesnt seem to fit in the flow of the passage... one being that he is very repetitive in his arguments and he goes over the same OT verses in his arguments. One of the verses that doesnt seem to follow his train of thought is the encouragement of entering his rest and then using the verse where God did not allow those who had the gospel preached to them under Joshua to enter into that rest.  He is talking to a people who were used to a lot of program type stuff.. i mean the ceremonial stuff. But His response is to focus on Jesus. And so this is the reason for the repetition.... he is doing what he is telling them to do.In this way following is following a follower of Christ. Or one who focuses on Christ as a habit. Christ is the rest.

Another verse that seems out of place is the verse about the word of God being a two edged sword... the rest being that Christ speaks in His word....just as He determined to keep that generation from entering His rest. I mean why would he emphasize the negative in order to encourage them to continue on in Christ? I think he is drawing a wide gulf between those who enter His rest and those who do not enter. And in this way it becomes more determinative. This is how they would think about the covenant that God made in the OT. They would be reminded that God did not call the nations.In this way they would exalt the sovereignty of God over their own abilities to hold on. Maybe the effort to make the christian life practical is to turn from the indicative approach and the subjection one has to the word of God... to avoid the encouragement to find rest in His word alone.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4916  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Saving faith vs Intellectual ascension on: May 26, 2009, 01:54:14 PM
2 "If only my anguish could be weighed
       and all my misery be placed on the scales!

 3 It would surely outweigh the sand of the seas—
       no wonder my words have been impetuous.

 4 The arrows of the Almighty are in me,
       my spirit drinks in their poison;
       God's terrors are marshaled against me.

 5 Does a wild donkey bray when it has grass
       or an ox bellow when it has fodder?

 6 Is tasteless food eaten without salt,
       or is there flavor in the white of an egg [a] ?

 7 I refuse to touch it;
       such food makes me ill.

 8 "Oh, that I might have my request,
       that God would grant what I hope for,

 9 that God would be willing to crush me,
       to let loose his hand and cut me off!

 10 Then I would still have this consolation—
       my joy in unrelenting pain—
       that I had not denied the words of the Holy One.

 11 "What strength do I have, that I should still hope?
       What prospects, that I should be patient?

 12 Do I have the strength of stone?
       Is my flesh bronze?

 13 Do I have any power to help myself,
       now that success has been driven from me?

 14 "A despairing man should have the devotion of his friends,
       even though he forsakes the fear of the Almighty.

 15 But my brothers are as undependable as intermittent streams,
       as the streams that overflow

Here he is not saying that he is blameless in the sense that he is not worthy of receiving this from God as a sinner... because he is acknowledging this as being from God and its not just a physical cause of the weight of his grief... but his spirit is weighted down. But he reassures himself of his confession... its a life of declaring his confession before God that he is again confessing here.In confessing he acknowledges his inability to have any power in himself... and he reasons that other men are  just as powerless!! 

Now this is what i want to get to.

In chapt 9 he consoles himself with God as the creator...the One who is in control of all big events... earth quakes... storms... and then God sustains the creatures.... then he acknowledges that this is from God and it is weighting his soul down... now in 10 here is this interesting part where he is going from being blameless to obtaining forgiveness... kind of like wrestling to have a word of peace... this ongoing search of learning forgiveness... and then he says this in 8 "Your hands shaped me and made me.
       Will you now turn and destroy me?

 9 Remember that you molded me like clay.
       Will you now turn me to dust again?

 10 Did you not pour me out like milk
       and curdle me like cheese,

 11 clothe me with skin and flesh
       and knit me together with bones and sinews?
Now then this is a blameless man... an obedient man.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4917  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Saving faith vs Intellectual ascension on: May 26, 2009, 10:43:59 AM
cont. from above...
The reason this is profound wisdom displayed by Job is that he is describing his position before God as an obedient sufferer. God does not lead us into suffering in order for us to reason that He is sovereign and there fore we must suffer... but He leads us so that we might learn His ways... that is the way as He is the remedy of the suffering... when we learn His ways we learn how to respond before Him in all of the reality of the situation. Wisdom is seeing the how, when , where, and why of our personal deli ma and spreading our argument before God as a means to further our perseverance and assurance.And its interesting that God does not give Job a point by point counter point ... because God responds to us in showing Himself to us before He brings the double blessing... i mean that the double is God coming in His answer to us of HImself and then proving it by supplying our needs. Gods response to Job was a remedy. cont. 
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4918  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Saving faith vs Intellectual ascension on: May 26, 2009, 09:53:38 AM
This two line reasoning has a certain determinist process .... that in my opinion makes the question a leading question....and that the moral equation is that i can have assurance of faith by my proof of works. I think that the person in  this culture who brings up this dichotomy between the place the mind and these individual works has in salvation are opposed in the assurance of faith... because in order for a person to argue that the proposition is valid... he must prove his saving knowledge with an equal performance of that knowledge.... the problem with this reasoning is that our faith is much smaller than we appear to present our being righteous on the outside. In other words in order for us to present a James argument we need a metaphor as James does... in order to move the focus off of the outward performance and on to the inward reality of the heart...

 James is upset that the rich of the church are appearing to be more righteous than the poor. Just like the first response in the moral principle of this world is to find the proof.... so it is a temptation of the christian community to present the message as equality of faith with equality of proof. But James is doing the opposite by his arguing for the proof... He is saying that its not what a man appears to be in this world that proves that he has saving faith... James is saying that God has turned the whole proving principle upside down....and now proof is how a man is molded to see who he is before God. Let me show you....

Lets look at Job.... if i might say that Job is the first Psalmist ... what i mean is that Job being one of the oldest books is very much in perfect harmony with how the Psalmist reasons... let me show you.... Now Jobs friends are reasoning that sin is the reason that Job is suffering... and that there is un confessed sin that God is dealing with him... that the main problem is Jobs morality and the mo tiff that blameless equals sin less... sound familiar?... now Job motives are not to prove his goodness but Job is thinking in a revealed way in order to show the reality that we all are no longer under condemnation... in other words Job has learned to reason according to how God thinks and that is why it proves that he had learned wisdom so that he was what he thought...

Here Job is pouring out his trouble before the Lord... i mean that Job is very human here... and he is as honest before God as his very profound wisdom is being expressed here.... and he is saying that since he is suffering in this way he is experiencing this imprisonment of his spirit.... and looking back, his poverty is represented by not even having a desire to be born... this is extreme suffering... and Job has practiced this open communication before God so that this line of reason is automatic. Job 3
 3 "May the day of my birth perish,
       and the night it was said, 'A boy is born!'

 4 That day—may it turn to darkness;
       may God above not care about it;
       may no light shine upon it.

 5 May darkness and deep shadow [a] claim it once more;
       may a cloud settle over it;
       may blackness overwhelm its light.

 6 That night—may thick darkness seize it;
       may it not be included among the days of the year
       nor be entered in any of the months.

 7 May that night be barren;
       may no shout of joy be heard in it.

 8 May those who curse days curse that day,
       those who are ready to rouse Leviathan.

 9 May its morning stars become dark;
       may it wait for daylight in vain
       and not see the first rays of dawn,

 10 for it did not shut the doors of the womb on me
       to hide trouble from my eyes.

 11 "Why did I not perish at birth,
       and die as I came from the womb?

 12 Why were there knees to receive me
       and breasts that I might be nursed?

 13 For now I would be lying down in peace;
       I would be asleep and at rest

 14 with kings and counselors of the earth,
       who built for themselves places now lying in ruins,

 15 with rulers who had gold,
       who filled their houses with silver.

 16 Or why was I not hidden in the ground like a stillborn child,
       like an infant who never saw the light of day?

 17 There the wicked cease from turmoil,
       and there the weary are at rest.

 18 Captives also enjoy their ease;
       they no longer hear the slave driver's shout.

 19 The small and the great are there,
       and the slave is freed from his master.

 20 "Why is light given to those in misery,
       and life to the bitter of soul,

 21 to those who long for death that does not come,
       who search for it more than for hidden treasure,

 22 who are filled with gladness
       and rejoice when they reach the grave?

 23 Why is life given to a man
       whose way is hidden,
       whom God has hedged in?

 24 For sighing comes to me instead of food;
       my groans pour out like water.

 25 What I feared has come upon me;
       what I dreaded has happened to me.

 26 I have no peace, no quietness;
       I have no rest, but only turmoil."

Its obvious by his friends response that they are thinking in a natural way... and i really think that Job in all of his wisdom sees right through all of this reasoning... i will show you this complete Psalmist response...to be cont.

4924  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: What's the purpose of baptism? on: May 24, 2009, 10:44:28 AM
Every nation on this earth from the beginning of time is ruled by the Lord. Since there are Gentile converts in the line of Christ then there are no absolute distinctions to who God reveals Himself. God has always been a cross cultural God. Because God has created the whole earth... and He has made all men...so that He has determined where men will live so that they can best respond to His revelation of Himself... because all men are not only cause to exist by God but all men are sustained by God. God speaks and there is light, God speaks and the weather patterns bring in the snow,rain and heat... and just as God has chosen to work all things for His pleasure so He has chosen to give a nation the oracles of God. God has revealed Himself to a nation. God rules the earth through a people. The earth is for man...
God intended from the beginning in the call of Abraham to extend His grace from the nation of Israel to the entire earth. His covenant with Abraham was that he would have an offspring that was as numbered as the stars of heaven. We are all from one man... Adam.We are all from one people...but God has chosen to group people in different nations when He confused the languages at the tower of Babel.
 Gods salvation is not toward a certain group. It does not come by the will of man. Salvation is not according to the view of man. There are more events that happened in the OT and NT in the history of saving than is recorded in the bible. Salvation is by the grace of God and is extended to man by the will of God. So that God will be glorified and His purposes for creating the world and mankind will not be thwarted.
4934  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Who do you pray to in the Trinity? on: May 22, 2009, 05:34:29 PM
Prayer is about God... its focusing on His attributes. If we want to know that we are forgiven then we must mindfully know that God is able... how is He able... because He is God... and our confidence in forgiveness is not feeling that we are forgiven as the initial communication of this inter action... that is God speaking to us and we are speaking back. If you love someone then you will spend time talking to them, and listening to what they are about. If you have not talked for awhile then there is some catching up to do ...so to speak. Well then what we desire and the aliveness in our relationships depends upon our connection to the other person. In talking to that person we are not just having it go in one ear and out the other but we are feeling a certain level of the other persons experience. And the more we know about the other person ... the more we know their hearts desires... the kind of things they like .. .the more we are going to feel comfortable with them.
Well God promises to fellowship with us in this same way. He is knocking on the door of our hearts.. He is seeking to reveal Himself to us as the all knowing God and as a God who will respond to our asking.. and a God who will reveal to us a remedy for our most deepest need. But the difference between our connecting with others and our connecting with God is that Gods disposition is the reality of how we define our enjoyment and having our answers to our questions. God is a supernatural God... He inhabits the prayers of His people.
How do we know what God wants and what pleases Him the most? We know it by reading and understanding His revelation. The more we know about God... the more access to the effects we will have in our fellowship with Him. God wants to fill us up with His personal care... He wants us to be filled with the Spirit. In prayer then we commune with someone who is effecting our lives in ways that we do not understand because we do not see all of the events that are brought together in order for us to know enough where we are confident that we know what is going to happen to us from one minute to another. Well God knows by His power to create ... sustain and uphold our very existence and the life we enjoy even in fellowship with Him! In prayer we find that God is all we need.. because He answers all of these different things in our lives and the way we feel about them. This is how He is accessible to us. There is nothing that He does not know.. nothing that He is not able to deal with... nothing that He has rejected in us and nothing that He cannot turn for our good. Gods communication to us is so free that we can express to Him in complete freedom... and in a sense we dont know what that freedom is like until He shows us as we fellowship with Him.
4938  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Romans and the Flesh Monster. on: May 22, 2009, 01:32:22 PM
In mentioning Hebrews... i am currently messed in this book. I am in the middle of the 4th chapter of memorization.... now as i meditate on this book ... i think the introduction of the first 2 chapters is vital in seeing how the author presents this law grace paradigm... first because the author is defining the definition of a new way of worship... and in this new way we actually are not just in a local congregation... its not just about the sabbath... but its an introduction to the actual access to throne of God and a heavenly family.And i know that He is dealing with the rituals such as the washings...the angels... the local presence of God in the shekinah and the important day as a sabbath. But now since Christ has ascended to the rite hand of the Father then He has finished the work... just as God finished the work of creation.

Now then this new relationship to Christ is kind of like a further definition of His introducing Himself as in this new family... and i dont think its just that He has a new local agency in the church... but it extends to the universal church and a religion of actual open access to the connection of this family love in this heavenly throne. The Father ... Son .. and Holy Spirit having these new definitions of this relationship to this new reality. For some reason then the motif of defining the difference between the old covenant and the new is the doctrine of Adoption. I think the apostle Paul stressed this doctrine in his epistles as the central force of Gods sovereign action to bring to bear on our earthly sojourn that we are now having the full reality of belonging on this earth... and we can now focus on this as it is finished... this acceptance into the heavenly family where we have no way of failing if we enter into the rest as they had done on the Sabbath.
Now this is why these exhortations that start in  chap 3 are really encouragements because since Christ was introduced as the Son of God ... the actual glory of God... the radiance of Gods glory... then that local focus now is transformed into a universal providence paradigm in which we are marked by Him in this adoptive security.  In other words Christ is coming to us and speaking this encouragement in this promise of faith as our brother now... no longer as if we were looking through the law in order to find that shekinah glory. The family of God transcends even our own ability to find Him in assurance as having to meet a requirement in order to be accepted as a son in Gods heavenly house. We look to our brother Christ as an evidence of our faith and we rejoice that we are now in this heavenly family by adoption. It is His rite to mark those who have faith and those who will not persevere.   
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4939  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: What's the purpose of baptism? on: May 22, 2009, 01:03:26 PM
The issue of a future Temple is something that I figure I'll deal with when we get there.  Whether it's literal or allegorical, I don't know.  I kinda figure that's a bit above my pay grade.  And there definitely is a connection between the OT and the NT.  Like you said, it's not a simple matter of that either/or.  That's why I was talking about finding out how we fit into the big story of the Scriptures, People/Kingdom of God, etc.  When I was saying that I don't think the answer to modern Judaism's lifelessness is a Temple, but is rather Jesus, what I meant was that in a post-Incarnation, New Covenant reality, restoring the ritual/Levitical context to the religion isn't good enough.  Even if there was a restoration of the Temple, it'd have to be different to properly fit into a New Covenant context.  The book of Hebrews is pretty clear on that.

Truth be told, the issue of how to mesh Judaism and Christianity is a bit of a sore spot for me, so I must confess that I can be (and have been during some of this discussion) a bit of a jerk when it comes up.  I spent most of my adult life in a Messianic Jewish congregation.  And during my time there, I saw too many friends and family walk away from Christ in favor of traditional Judaism.  And among many who didn't walk away, there was a downplaying of the greater Body of Christ, New Covenant Grace, and the Gospel itself because those concepts weren't "Jewish enough."  And this was rarely among people who were believers in Yeshua and of Jewish heritage; it was usually gentile Christians who became wannabe Jews. 

So, forgive my snark and argumentativeness; some wounds in this area still haven't fully healed.

In mentioning Hebrews... i am currently messed in this book. I am in the middle of the 4th chapter of memorization.... now as i meditate on this book ... i think the introduction of the first 2 chapters is vital in seeing how the author presents this law grace paradigm... first because the author is defining the definition of a new way of worship... and in this new way we actually are not just in a local congregation... its not just about the sabbath... but its an introduction to the actual access to throne of God and a heavenly family.And i know that He is dealing with the rituals such as the washings...the angels... the local presence of God in the shekinah and the important day as a sabbath. But now since Christ has ascended to the rite hand of the Father then He has finished the work... just as God finished the work of creation.

Now then this new relationship to Christ is kind of like a further definition of His introducing Himself as in this new family... and i dont think its just that He has a new local agency in the church... but it extends to the universal church and a religion of actual open access to the connection of this family love in this heavenly throne. The Father ... Son .. and Holy Spirit having these new definitions of this relationship to this new reality. For some reason then the motif of defining the difference between the old covenant and the new is the doctrine of Adoption. I think the apostle Paul stressed this doctrine in his epistles as the central force of Gods sovereign action to bring to bear on our earthly sojourn that we are now having the full reality of belonging on this earth... and we can now focus on this as it is finished... this acceptance into the heavenly family where we have no way of failing if we enter into the rest as they had done on the Sabbath.
Now this is why these exhortations that start in  chap 3 are really encouragements because since Christ was introduced as the Son of God ... the actual glory of God... the radiance of Gods glory... then that local focus now is transformed into a universal providence paradigm in which we are marked by Him in this adoptive security.  In other words Christ is coming to us and speaking this encouragement in this promise of faith as our brother now... no longer as if we were looking through the law in order to find that shekinah glory. The family of God transcends even our own ability to find Him in assurance as having to meet a requirement in order to be accepted as a son in Gods heavenly house. We look to our brother Christ as an evidence of our faith and we rejoice that we are now in this heavenly family by adoption. It is His rite to mark those who have faith and those who will not persevere.   
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4940  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Romans and the Flesh Monster. on: May 22, 2009, 11:29:43 AM
Calvinism and Gods sovereignty define the boundaries of societal institutions. In teaching universalism men make an effort to redefine these boundaries. Gods ways are definite because His ways are the ends in the creation of personal wholeness. Because He is a personal God, He speaks to each of His sheep in a personal way.. the teaching of universalism is that by which a society seeks to suppress the knowledge of these boundaries in an effort to cover over the truth of the distinct and exclusive personal nature of the love of God. In redefining this love ...a society redefines the view of all relationships on a horizontal level.
One the other side of this is this reaction to the unhealthy consequences that result in suppressing these distinctions as a support of personal wholeness. The ways of God are the ways of grace and love. These are the distinct ways in which God communicates in His ways .. in the special grace of God and in the common grace of God. Any way of God that is redefined is an effort to create a need for the intervention of a new knowledge in a moral sense to prove that there is wisdom in the ways of man. This is an effort to suppress the special love of God and replace it with a general love, and in doing this men become principled in intervening in the personal freedoms of other men. If God is not distinct in the communication of His love and grace as a means to the peaceful functioning in a society then men are free to attempt to suppress the cause , means and ends of His love in this authoritarian culture in replacing these institutions for the sake of suppressing the personal nature of Gods communication. If everyone believed in a Theocracy ... i guess this would express the ultimate function of respect for these boundaries in the institutions God has set up....  Job 21 14 Yet they say to God, 'Leave us alone!
       We have no desire to know your ways.
15 Who is the Almighty, that we should serve him?
       What would we gain by praying to him?'
16 But their prosperity is not in their own hands,
       so I stand aloof from the counsel of the wicked.(Parallelism)
17 "Yet how often is the lamp of the wicked snuffed out?
       How often does calamity come upon them,
       the fate God allots in his anger?
18 How often are they like straw before the wind,
       like chaff swept away by a gale?
19 It is said, 'God stores up a man's punishment for his sons.'
       Let him repay the man himself, so that he will know it!
20 Let his own eyes see his destruction;
       let him drink of the wrath of the Almighty. [c]
 21 For what does he care about the family he leaves behind
       when his allotted months come to an end?

 22 "Can anyone teach knowledge to God,
       since he judges even the highest?     
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4941  Members Only / Purgatory / Re: Universalism: Definding the unbeliever at the expense of the Sheep on: May 22, 2009, 10:02:36 AM
Calvinism and Gods sovereignty define the boundaries of societal institutions. In teaching universalism men make an effort to redefine these boundaries. Gods ways are definite because His ways are the ends in the creation of personal wholeness. Because He is a personal God, He speaks to each of His sheep in a personal way.. the teaching of universalism is that by which a society seeks to suppress the knowledge of these boundaries in an effort to cover over the truth of the distinct and exclusive personal nature of the love of God. In redefining this love ...a society redefines the view of all relationships on a horizontal level.
One the other side of this is this reaction to the unhealthy consequences that result in suppressing these distinctions as a support of personal wholeness. The ways of God are the ways of grace and love. These are the distinct ways in which God communicates in His ways .. in the special grace of God and in the common grace of God. Any way of God that is redefined is an effort to create a need for the intervention of a new knowledge in a moral sense to prove that there is wisdom in the ways of man. This is an effort to suppress the special love of God and replace it with a general love, and in doing this men become principled in intervening in the personal freedoms of other men. If God is not distinct in the communication of His love and grace as a means to the peaceful functioning in a society then men are free to attempt to suppress the cause , means and ends of His love in this authoritarian culture in replacing these institutions for the sake of suppressing the personal nature of Gods communication. If everyone believed in a Theocracy ... i guess this would express the ultimate function of respect for these boundaries in the institutions God has set up....  Job 21 14 Yet they say to God, 'Leave us alone!
       We have no desire to know your ways.
15 Who is the Almighty, that we should serve him?
       What would we gain by praying to him?'
16 But their prosperity is not in their own hands,
       so I stand aloof from the counsel of the wicked.
(Parallelism)
17 "Yet how often is the lamp of the wicked snuffed out?
       How often does calamity come upon them,
       the fate God allots in his anger?
18 How often are they like straw before the wind,
       like chaff swept away by a gale?
19 It is said, 'God stores up a man's punishment for his sons.'
       Let him repay the man himself, so that he will know it!
20 Let his own eyes see his destruction;
       let him drink of the wrath of the Almighty. [c]
 21 For what does he care about the family he leaves behind
       when his allotted months come to an end?

 22 "Can anyone teach knowledge to God,
       since he judges even the highest?  
   
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4942  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Romans and the Flesh Monster. on: May 21, 2009, 03:06:02 PM
Every christian has sins that he is musing at... but the reality is that the sin is a foreign object in a sanctified heart... so there is a general level of weakness that each of us has... in many different levels and many different kinds...in this way... we are in a real sense in this battle that is not about worrying if we are going to at some time be enabled to incorporate enough resistance by our prayers and the means to overcome the sin. So  we place on ourselves a note of promise that we will pay the price in order to avoid the sin. This is how we naturally think of hating sin... but the problem is that there is not enough hatred in us to pay this enormous price. We must acknowledge that we are helpless in our effort. And for some reason even tho we have a personal relationship with sin... yet in following our natural instincts in opposing the sin ... we actually throw flames on the fire of temptation. Thats why the apostle said that when the law was alive i died.. and when it worked death in me... then the desire to sin increased. So the answer is for us not to perform the operation to kill sin. The laws function in working death is our working for wages to respond to a payment. And this is why the sorrow we experience in our  blindness to this enemy is actually greater than our relationship to the sorrow over the sin. I think Luther is saying that he would rather experience the pleasure of the sin... than the sorrow that accompanies the law in the accusing nature of the Devil. Because that sorrow actually encourages more sin.     
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4943  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Do we sin because we don't love God enough? on: May 21, 2009, 02:58:30 PM
Every christian has sins that he is musing at... but the reality is that the sin is a foreign object in a sanctified heart... so there is a general level of weakness that each of us has... in many different levels and many different kinds...in this way... we are in a real sense in this battle that is not about worrying if we are going to at some time be enabled to incorporate enough resistance by our prayers and the means to overcome the sin. So  we place on ourselves a note of promise that we will pay the price in order to avoid the sin. This is how we naturally think of hating sin... but the problem is that there is not enough hatred in us to pay this enormous price. We must acknowledge that we are helpless in our effort. And for some reason even tho we have a personal relationship with sin... yet in following our natural instincts in opposing the sin ... we actually throw flames on the fire of temptation. Thats why the apostle said that when the law was alive i died.. and when it worked death in me... then the desire to sin increased. So the answer is for us not to perform the operation to kill sin. The laws function in working death is our working for wages to respond to a payment. And this is why the sorrow we experience in our  blindness to this enemy is actually greater than our relationship to the sorrow over the sin. I think Luther is saying that he would rather experience the pleasure of the sin... than the sorrow that accompanies the law in the accusing nature of the Devil. Because that sorrow actually encourages more sin.     
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4944  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Do we sin because we don't love God enough? on: May 21, 2009, 02:33:50 PM
Obed, that was a more than a word fitly spoken. As I sit here typing this response, I am roiling on the inside. I have a confusion of both real and imaginary sin besieging my mind and soul with the concomittant real and imaginary judgment looming. I can tell that the fear is most likely from the enemy but that doesn't seem to ease the torment much. I know my salvation is not in question but with my usual impure motives I am afraid of the one key blessing I have been praying and pleading for for so long being yanked away. That one fear is so starkly terrifying that it is almost ready to drive me into real sin. (Which I believe is what the enemy wants anyway). I wonder, is there a temporary similarity between those who "sin so that grace may abound" and those who realize that they are free and as a result spriniging from delirious joy, go and run off (temporarily) into genuine sin? It is said that "there is nothing more arrogant then a lately-freed slave." When we finally are able to shake off the tyranny and chains of legalism and conditional love, does it always necessarily follow that we are going to go running straight to righteousness out of sheer gratitude? Will we not sometimes tarry in the flesh and test our new-found freedom just to see if God is "serious" about this wonderful promise? Or is this just straight-up liscence? How then would we ever know the extent of our freedom if God did not let us "run-off into the woods" so to speak, where we can get scraped-up and bloody and come back crying to Him so that He can lavish His grace on us.

If not, is our freedom only theoretical then? The paradox: we are admonished in 1 John not to sin, yet we will sin. That seems to be the answer in a pretzel then; was he only talking about wilful, gross in (i.e. adultery, hatred) or did his directive cover the entire spectrum? Gratitude for my freedom and the fact that no punishment is any longer forthcoming will take me far in walking a sanctified walk - but it wont quite get me across the finish line. Only death or the Lord's return will see to that. In the mean time, this mobile sin-factory has been declared righteous and not made thus. The change comes from that wonderful promise which enables me to receive the Spirit's work in my life. Nothing else is going to effect it in me. Nothing else can.

P.S. Yours is a great post too, Bec. (And that is one beautiful daughter you have there!).
Its always a pleasure to read you TB!
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4945  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Romans and the Flesh Monster. on: May 20, 2009, 09:55:36 PM
Not to make lite of anyone's terrible plight... i mean that this world is a terrible place... i imagine that there is a level of child abuse as a culture evil even tho there may not be the actual betrayal of a childs innocence. Sin is so dangerous that it demands the ultimate punishment... that is even if we hated the sin... hated the perpetrator of the sin it still would not measure up to the amount of punishment that was placed on Christ. Now then is that wrath of God enough to change our experience in this world of the lingering effects to our living with the abuse? Well ... if we did not experience this level of sin then we would not see the amount of grace it takes for us to be accepted by God. In this way the amount of depression that comes as a result of the scars we receive from this sin...and i might say that the pain itself would cause much anguish and anger... but it is not good to follow any set formula in order to find the remedy... i mean the moment we say that we must follow this step or that level of encouragement is the moment we place a weight of performance on overcoming the problem... every person who experiences sorrow in this world must find the answer in the forgiveness and mercy of God. The feeling of helplessness is a result of the sorrow over the pain of the scar.The assimilation of the way of the cross ..that is in seeing the effects of sin on this earth and the level of sorrow not only from our own pain but from the natural evil then we must exhale the pain and anger to God and we must inhale His word and His peace or His speaking peace to us...

God tempts no man... but He decrees  whatsoever comes to pass... if God did not decree then He could not know it as God.If God does not have an intimate knowledge of the future then He is not God. Because it is our finite understanding to think of the effects of sin and the nature of evil in how we have experienced it then we have a very slanted view of the amount of evil in us... even if we are a very moral person... and the evil that we have the potential to fall into... what the source of the power to keep us from this evil and how God has been in using our own sin to turn it to good... For there is only one will in God... He can decree sin and at the same time He can turn it for God... He can decree a sin and bring justice to bear on the perpetrators of that sin. If God has two wills then  He changes.

But even tho sin is decreed in a passive way ... yet we must not define sin down by saying that  God did not decree it in some way... because for ever choice in this world there is a cause... nothing would exist without the act of a will.. and nothing would be of real value to us if there was not a view from us of our own sin and the sin of evil men. If sin is going to be personal to us then we must conclude that sin comes from our natural desire to do a sin... if it was not from a necessity then it is not personal.We are sinners.. that s why we sin.

 Since Christ has died He has promised to keep us from sin.. by keeping us from the temptation to sin and the temptation to despair to the point that sin is set between us and our Lord... so that we have longing graces in order for us to develop the desire to long for holiness and in longing for God we find holiness. But we cannot find our strength from temptation by the men of this world... just like God has promised to keep us from  temptation He has promise to shield us from the destructive people who Satan uses to bring us to stumble... thats why we should not sit in the seat of the scornful or stand in the way of sinners... because they are there to set traps in our way so that we will stumble... so we meditate on His law nite and day... and that will give us counsel... that will answer our sin problems... that will give us grace in order to find relief from the pain of sin.. and it will keep us from following a path of self righteousness. sorry i am long winded but that last post was causing me to burn.
4947  Forums / Main Forum / Re: Hating it so much on: May 20, 2009, 04:00:52 PM
May i defend myself... i have had a ministry for most of my sons years here at the house... i have made a good living on top of that... and ive had much sorrow even suffered depression...and still have the potential to suffer it again with some lingering ... but none of these things mean any thing to my progress.. these things are dung...The only thing i want is to know Him... long for Him and in that maybe He is going to call me to do another ministry... maybe my ministry is going to be to suffer for Him. But i can assure you that this does not mean a hill of beans in the long run... give it up for Him and let Him lead you where He wants.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4948  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Romans and the Flesh Monster. on: May 20, 2009, 03:13:51 PM
May i say that we never find full confidence in all of our lives about our confession... or ability to experience a level of joy that always finds comfort in this world in light of our struggle of faith. Thats why we no longer are under the obligation to repent in our own strength.. we are now in Christ and we are in a relationship to Him as the King.... so that we are led by Him... for He knows our weaknesses ...seeing that we are but dust... In this way we have our confidence in Him alone and not in our ability to respond to His commands because when we find our strength to persevere in this world there is no self reliance... for we find no strength in our own horses... Christ has taken care of sin... but we do not always experience this level of confidence. This is why the apostle prays that the eyes of our hearts may be opened... How do we experience this new light... well we must realize that we now have an older brother who is as close to us...since He made us holy ... just like He is holy then He will not be ashamed of us..
But since He has not fully come to be king in this world of sin and temptation then we are to focus our thoughts on Christ... for He is the Son over the house of God! We are to draw our confidence from Him... because He has in His anger swore that those who are self righteous will never enter His rest... so that those who would cause us grief may be allowed to buffet us in this world.. but they will only find their end without Him...for He promises us to keep us....
Not by our faith but by His under girding us even when our faith is small...for He promises to hold us up when we are faint... since He was a man who suffered when He was tempted ... He as our brother and Son of God over the hous of God is able to help those who are being tempted. Christ saves us from the wicked hands of men who would do us harm... and He promises to deliver us from the dogs who complain from self righteousness... He would have us to feel the weight of our sins so that we will not have a confidence like the complainers.  Brothers if i have not expressed a text of scripture then you can show me. I do have a sense of His presence in this lowness. NOw my heart is burning within me. Thank you. 
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4949  Forums / Main Forum / Re: Hating it so much on: May 20, 2009, 03:09:28 PM
May i say that we never find full confidence in all of our lives about our confession... or ability to experience a level of joy that always finds comfort in this world in light of our struggle of faith. Thats why we no longer are under the obligation to repent in our own strength.. we are now in Christ and we are in a relationship to Him as the King.... so that we are led by Him... for He knows our weaknesses ...seeing that we are but dust... In this way we have our confidence in Him alone and not in our ability to respond to His commands because when we find our strength to persevere in this world there is no self reliance... for we find no strength in our own horses... Christ has taken care of sin... but we do not always experience this level of confidence. This is why the apostle prays that the eyes of our hearts may be opened... How do we experience this new light... well we must realize that we now have an older brother who is as close to us...since He made us holy ... just like He is holy then He will not be ashamed of us..
But since He has not fully come to be king in this world of sin and temptation then we are to focus our thoughts on Christ... for He is the Son over the house of God! We are to draw our confidence from Him... because He has in His anger swore that those who are self righteous will never enter His rest... so that those who would cause us grief may be allowed to buffet us in this world.. but they will only find their end without Him...for He promises us to keep us....
Not by our faith but by His under girding us even when our faith is small...for He promise to hold us up when we are faint... since He was a man who suffered when He was tempted ... He as our brother and Son of God over the hous of God is able to help those who are being tempted. Christ saves us from the wicked hands of men who would do us harm... and He promises to deliver us from the dogs who complain from self righteousness... He would have us to feel the weight of our sins so that we will not have a confidence like the complainers.  Brothers if i have not expressed a text of scripture then you can show me. I do have a sense of His presence in this lowness. 
4951  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Finding the meaning : mybigGod on: May 20, 2009, 12:29:53 PM
 Hebrews 1:1Πολυμερῶς1 καὶ πολυτρόπως2 πάλαι3 ὁ θεὸς λαλήσας τοῖς πατράσιν ἐν τοῖς προφήταις ἐπ’ ἐσχάτου τῶν ἡμερῶν τούτων ἐλάλησεν ἡμῖν ἐν υἱῷ, 2 ὃν ἔθηκεν κληρονόμον4 πάντων, δι’ οὗ καὶ ἐποίησεν τοὺς αἰῶνας·

ἐν τοῖς προφήταις  in the prophets... Is used in with about the same force that dia with the  genitive has God spoke through prophets then , but now through the Son... Mt 12: 27,28 dm

although dia is occasionally used to express agency, it does not approximate the full strength of upo... This distinction throws light on Jesus relation to the creation, implying that Jesus was not the absolute independent creator, but rather the intermediate agent in creation. dm well He is God... equal in substance ... different in person.  mbg.

ὁ θεὸς...The God... is used in the Nt of the Father... as the revealed God... Jn 1:1 Bul. We construe him to mean that there is nno definite rule governing the use of the article with θεὸς, so that sometimes the writers viewpoint is difficult to detect, which is entirely true. But the great majority of instances the reason for the distinction is clear. The use of θεὸς in jn 1:1 is  a good example points to Christ fellowship with the person of the Father.Christ participation in the essence of the divine nature. The former clearly applies to personality, while the latter applies to character... (disposition-mbg) . This distinction is in line with the general force of the article.dm

θεὸς....without the article 1 where the Deity is contrasted with what is human.... 2 when the essential attributes of Deity are spoken of 3 when operations proceeding from God are appropriated to one of the three Divine Persons4 when the Deity is spoken of as heathens would speak who denied the existence of the Son and Spirit.
With the article... 1 when the Deity is spoken of in the Christian point of view 2 when the Father is specially designated , unless its insertion is unnecessary by the addition of patrnp-Father...or some distinctive epithet.dm

Πολυμερῶς1...in many portions bul. only here.
πολυτρόπως..in many ways bul
Adverbs are used to express relationships of time , place, manner, and degree. when , where how, how much and sometimes to what extent. dm
the conjunctions express adverbial ideas iin relation to clauses, where as adverbs in the narrower sense express such ideas only in relation to words.dm rob. has registered it as his opinion that all adverbs in ῶς were originally ablatives-adjective..dm
1.    (in some inflected languages) noting a case that has among its functions the indication of place from which or, as in Latin, place in which, manner, means, instrument, or agent.
λαλήσας...spake... to talk or to use the voice without reference to the words spoken Mark 2:2 bul. compared to 1:1f ἐλάλησεν ἡμῖν ἐν υἱῷ .. to utter words to talk speak... the persons to whom or with whom one is speaking is mentioned in various ways like face to face.bdag... the distinction of difference is the clarity between the old and the new. mutter...shadows<> a clear message mbg
4953  Forums / Main Forum / Re: Questions on: May 20, 2009, 12:00:04 PM
Why was it necessary to strike the ground 5 or 6 times?

I must say that i find this particular passage in light of the mysterious nature of Gods will in something that seems to the human eye as full of contradictions... that it is possible and then even necessary that God  personally intervene in the wills of men in this communicative way.... so that what is rite is what is spoken through His prophets even when there seems to be a moral freedom in the number of hits to the ground. So that God has the absolute rite to declare something for the purpose of withholding that revelation from one man and revealing it to another.... because the truth is not in confidence of the means but its in the author of the means.
Now then there is a mystery in why one man is brought down and another man is exalted. But that is because God works from a bigger picture than we can even come close to understanding. And i suppose that Elishas understanding of Gods design in that communication to him was true in the distinction that the king had not understood that message of truth. I find the story of these two prophets Elijah and Elisha in their use of these different means and the folly of mans reason as to why ... i mean it seems silly in how we logically would address these troubles in the folly of why we would logically do this in order to find a remedy .... but in a supernatural world they are not silly.   
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4954  Members Only / Purgatory / Re: Universalism: Definding the unbeliever at the expense of the Sheep on: May 20, 2009, 11:37:02 AM
Heres my thinking on this struggle with universalism... its always an effort to hold men in bondage to other mens authority and press His sheep to find relief in a structure of institutional adultery. I must say in this finding relief in other men of like mind.. we dont want to create a brotherhood of fascism where our tongues get the best of us... but we must find our relief in the anxiety of loneliness and isolation of a releasing this terrible plight into the hands of God ...for where there are many words there is mens temptation to scheme another web of law order.. God is perfectly able to come to the relief of all of His children in His perfect working of His love because He is able to protect the self interest of His children by His working in this world of His perfect justice... a justice that is according to His design to protect His own children even when men have no understanding of His design to atone for the sins that seem to hold men in bondage. We are not that able.
Therefore it is incumbent on us to practice a heart religion even if we face the scorn of others who have no discipline to find the peace enough to have their hearts searched by God in long hours of loneliness. This is because men in their natural love of a false understanding of the nature of Gods holy indignation find relief in a security that is developed out  of a false application of love from our fore fathers. Universalism is not love.   
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4955  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Romans and the Flesh Monster. on: May 20, 2009, 11:12:24 AM
Societies of this world are under the divine influence... the divine mandate and the divine order of Gods judgment. This is why if there is going to be any real peace and love in a society its going to come in God being pleased to show His grace and mercy to that society. But there is one problem that is working against Gods grace and peace... it is sin in the hearts of men that causes all of the influences that create the environment of threats and unrest. Because when evil schemes and threats are pervasive in streets and the cities of a society it is because mens hearts are not subdued by the understanding of Gods secret work in bringing justice to bear on this evil influence that men perpetuate. The terrifying influence is the free flow of sin and selfishness that comes out of the heart of man and is natural to men . The answer is the subduing of that outbreak by the justice of God in His secret counsel.

 God sees everything... behind the walls of all of the houses... businesses ... in the dark alleys... rite down into the thoughts of all men in a society... and He declares that all mens thoughts are futile... not only those who do not have God in their thoughts but those who think that God is like them...so that what appears to be rite in our view of the world is not always what is rite in the secret counsels of God. The reality is that in all the cities of this earth there are cries from mens hearts from the fear of threats... the personal guilt or guilt by association.. and the more men are able to throw off the bands of Gods law the more this terrifying influence will permeate the streets of our cities. The more mens hearts wax cold the more there is going to be mens hearts failing within them...

God leaves this kind of evil influence to remind His children of there need to absolutely depended upon Him. This is why God promises to come to the aid of His children in order to keep them from being overcome by sorrow, guilt and fear. As the men in society grow hard heart ed the foundations of that society begin to crumble. This may cause men to blame God for their own troubles that come as a result of viewing the hardness of this influence.... Even His children will struggle ... and at times God is causing them to be anxious so that they will learn how to come to Him and draw strength ... comfort .. and assurance that God is still in control and when He answers then it will be a cause for praise and adoration.... For God promises to hear the cries of the afflicted and He comes to the aid of the fatherless and helpless.
When we grow anxious and begin to feel this evil hardness in the influence of a wicked generation then we must use this a motivation to petition our Father for His protection for if we are assured of His protection then we will not grow weary in our resisting. The reality of the level of guilt and fear is pushed upon us as a result of mens hearts failing them... we must have a place where we can go beyond this experience so that we are enabled to pour our hearts out before Him so that we will experience a renewal in the deep struggle that goes on in the faltering of our own courage.. for if we hold on to the confidence we had at the beginning then we will be humbled to cast all of our anxiety on Him. 
4957  Forums / Main Forum / Re: Hating it so much on: May 19, 2009, 12:38:27 PM
Societies of this world are under the divine influence... the divine mandate and the divine order of Gods judgment. This is why if there is going to be any real peace and love in a society its going to come in God being pleased to show His grace and mercy to that society. But there is one problem that is working against Gods grace and peace... it is sin in the hearts of men that causes all of the influences that create the environment of threats and unrest. Because when evil schemes and threats are pervasive in streets and the cities of a society it is because mens hearts are not subdued by the understanding of Gods secret work in bringing justice to bear on this evil influence that men perpetuate. The terrifying influence is the free flow of sin and selfishness that comes out of the heart of man and is natural to men . The answer is the subduing of that outbreak by the justice of God in His secret counsel.

 God sees everything... behind the walls of all of the houses... businesses ... in the dark alleys... rite down into the thoughts of all men in a society... and He declares that all mens thoughts are futile... not only those who do not have God in their thoughts but those who think that God is like them...so that what appears to be rite in our view of the world is not always what is rite in the secret counsels of God. The reality is that in all the cities of this earth there are cries from mens hearts from the fear of threats... the personal guilt or guilt by association.. and the more men are able to throw off the bands of Gods law the more this terrifying influence will permeate the streets of our cities. The more mens hearts wax cold the more there is going to be mens hearts failing within them...

God leaves this kind of evil influence to remind His children of there need to absolutely depended upon Him. This is why God promises to come to the aid of His children in order to keep them from being overcome by sorrow, guilt and fear. As the men in society grow hard heart ed the foundations of that society begin to crumble. This may cause men to blame God for their own troubles that come as a result of viewing the hardness of this influence.... Even His children will struggle ... and at times God is causing them to be anxious so that they will learn how to come to Him and draw strength ... comfort .. and assurance that God is still in control and when He answers then it will be a cause for praise and adoration.... For God promises to hear the cries of the afflicted and He comes to the aid of the fatherless and helpless.
When we grow anxious and begin to feel this evil hardness in the influence of a wicked generation then we must use this a motivation to petition our Father for His protection for if we are assured of His protection then we will not grow weary in our resisting. The reality of the level of guilt and fear is pushed upon us as a result of mens hearts failing them... we must have a place where we can go beyond this experience so that we are enabled to pour our hearts out before Him so that we will experience a renewal in the deep struggle that goes on in the faltering of our own courage.. for if we hold on to the confidence we had at the beginning then we will be humbled to cast all of our anxiety on Him.   
 
4961  Forums / Main Forum / Re: Questions on: May 18, 2009, 12:11:26 PM
Judges 14  1 Samson went down to Timnah and saw there a young Philistine woman. 2 When he returned, he said to his father and mother, "I have seen a Philistine woman in Timnah; now get her for me as my wife."

 3 His father and mother replied, "Isn't there an acceptable woman among your relatives or among all our people? Must you go to the uncircumcised Philistines to get a wife?"
      But Samson said to his father, "Get her for me. She's the right one for me." 4 (His parents did not know that this was from the LORD, who was seeking an occasion to confront the Philistines; for at that time they were ruling over Israel.) 5

Now here you have Samson who had taken a Nazarite vow. And he wasnt suppose to take foreign wives. Even his parents were suspicious of his motives.... but then on top of this God is working this to incite Samson to anger for the purpose of delivering Israel from the Philistines... Huh? and then this is how God works in Samson to anger.... He tells the Philistines a riddle then he says... 13 If you can't tell me the answer, you must give me thirty linen garments and thirty sets of clothes."
      "Tell us your riddle," they said. "Let's hear it."
Heres his wife ...16 Then Samson's wife threw herself on him, sobbing, "You hate me! You don't really love me. You've given my people a riddle, but you haven't told me the answer." so he tells her the answer to the riddle .... then  19 Then the Spirit of the LORD came upon him in power. He went down to Ashkelon, struck down thirty of their men, stripped them of their belongings and gave their clothes to those who had explained the riddle. Burning with anger, he went up to his father's house. 20 And Samson's wife was given to the friend who had attended him at his wedding.so God motivated Samson to get revenge.... So the Philistines went up and burned her and her father to death. 7 Samson said to them, "Since you've acted like this, I won't stop until I get my revenge on you." 8 He attacked them viciously and slaughtered many of them. Then he went down and stayed in a cave in the rock of Etam.

Is this an example of God working outside the normal means of procuring an offspring for the line of Christ?

Does the circumstances of a believers life always fit in with the rite thing to do?

28 Then Samson prayed to the LORD, "O Sovereign LORD, remember me. O God, please strengthen me just once more, and let me with one blow get revenge on the Philistines for my two eyes." 29 Then Samson reached toward the two central pillars on which the temple stood. Bracing himself against them, his right hand on the one and his left hand on the other, 30 Samson said, "Let me die with the Philistines!" Then he pushed with all his might, and down came the temple on the rulers and all the people in it. Thus he killed many more when he died than while he lived.

 Is this last phrase in bold an example of Gods grace?

 Was this part of the working of God to confront the Philistines in the working of Samsons sin so that His purpose was to confront the Philistines by Samsons sin?
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4962  Forums / Main Forum / Re: Questions on: May 17, 2009, 04:47:10 PM
Been memorizing Heb... and its not as confrontational as it appears... its really an encouragement... the first 4 chapts. and so its meant to encourage the saints who have not returned to the old ways.... i mean... in the phrase let none of you.... that is the Shepherd is going out to get the 99th... and as sure as those that were unable to enter the promise land is as sure as those who have faith will remain to the end... heres the interesting switch in the argument. chapt 4  3Now we who have believed enter that rest, just as God has said,
   "So I declared on oath in my anger,
   'They shall never enter my rest.' "

Here and i havent studied the text but i think this is an old Hebrew way of arguing... i mean... not a comparison... but a promise... to the righteous...in other words the security of those who possess faith is that He is sure to distinguish... Its to increase their hope and courage. 
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4963  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Romans and the Flesh Monster. on: May 17, 2009, 04:31:08 PM
Heres my problem with that thinking... i mean with a wrong usage of the worship of God through an idol... Where does idol worship begin? Well because of the nature of sin when idols are introduced ... i mean there is the problem in original thoughts outside the true worship... i think the apostle said it well... he was covetous.... now that can come in all forms... i mean.. power... money... prestige...etc... idols are formed in the mind before they are worshiped with the body.. and then they create the kind of person ... the way they think and how they live their lives....  because every moral philosophy demands a return... and any idol that man creates is a reflection of his own pride. In this way men become like their idols. They even put the clothes on and appear in that form. So then the sin of idolatry is not submitting your desires to what God desires...

Idols make us hate what is good... not necessarily what is according to a moral code... but according to submitting oneself to the description of a person rather than the person himself. So that a person measures everything by the outward conformity. The way they talk is about the outward behavior... as if the amount of pressure applied to the will in the society of checks and balances that their moral goodness will define their ability to procure status with God and with man.  In other words the focus is on the letter of the law for the purpose of exercising choice as the point at which they talk about producing good works. This is not done from the principle of love... in the sense of being caused to find the object of their desire outside of themselves but rather the cause is from guilt as the communication of their goodness. This is how we know that it is impossible for an unregenerate man to keep from idols.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4964  Forums / Main Forum / Re: Questions on: May 17, 2009, 04:25:56 PM
Obed.... Heres my problem with that thinking... i mean with a wrong usage of the worship of God through an idol... Where does idol worship begin? Well because of the nature of sin when idols are introduced ... i mean there is the problem in original thoughts outside the true worship... i think the apostle said it well... he was covetous.... now that can come in all forms... i mean.. power... money... prestige...etc... idols are formed in the mind before they are worshiped with the body.. and then they create the kind of person ... the way they think and how they live their lives....  because every moral philosophy demands a return... and any idol that man creates is a reflection of his own pride. In this way men become like their idols. They even put the clothes on and appear in that form. So then the sin of idolatry is not submitting your desires to what God desires...

Idols make us hate what is good... not necessarily what is according to a moral code... but according to submitting oneself to the description of a person rather than the person himself. So that a person measures everything by the outward conformity. The way they talk is about the outward behavior... as if the amount of pressure applied to the will in the society of checks and balances that their moral goodness will define their ability to procure status with God and with man.  In other words the focus is on the letter of the law for the purpose of exercising choice as the point at which they talk about producing good works. This is not done from the principle of love... in the sense of being caused to find the object of their desire outside of themselves but rather the cause is from guilt as the communication of their goodness. This is how we know that it is impossible for an unregenerate man to keep from idols.   
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4965  Forums / Main Forum / Re: Catholic Question about John 6 on: May 17, 2009, 03:11:06 PM
Do not merely listen to the word, and so deceive yourselves. Do what it says. Anyone who listens to the word but does not do what it says is like a man who looks at his face in a mirror and, after looking at himself, goes away and immediately forgets what he looks like. But the man who looks intently into the perfect law that gives freedom, and continues to do this, not forgetting what he has heard, but doing it—he will be blessed in what he does.

(James 1:22-25)

Yes that verse is saying that when you miss represent His grace that you cast blame on Him. Because you sell His righteousness for an idol... when you sell His eternal life for the worship of men as in place of Christ then you cheapen His gospel and you place heavy burdens on the weak and widows... fatherless and children in the faith. I am bound to preach nothing than Christ crucified and His the five solas.... for i do not want it to be said of me in the destruction of His childrens faith in coming to Him ... that i had a mill stone dropped on my head.... And my warning to you is nothing in the power i have to make you want to believe in grace... but its so that you dont find Him in that way.... I am as guilty as you in my practical atheism.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment