|
This is the world that a believer is been
renewed into. And its like a fairy land. Because God promises to give us
health, make us dwell in peace, and enjoy the fruits of the land. This
is our personal experience. This is the wonder of belonging to a
gracious God who gifts us with all things.
Obviously since the
world is so against the blessings of God then we have a tendency to
lower our standards. And we get confusing messages about what is real
humility and what is double mindedness. But the world is not really what
we see with our eyes. The world is a kingdom that is in us. We do not
become what we are not but we become what we already are. And this is
what is so hard about this world. Its knowing how much we are loved but
being frustrated because we are always being opposed, held back, trapped
in someones schemes, and trying to hold onto those first principles.
But most of the time the world gets the best of us and we begin to live
in two personalities.
But this is what is so unbelievable about
our position as sons in our fathers house. We can build convictions and
wait on God. Because the only other way to advance is to do things and
say things that make us double minded. We can build a big life of
hypocrisy. Thats why Jesus says that the only safe way to go is to
either hate the one and love the other or hate the other and love the
one. You cannot love God and pragmatism. You must believe that God gifts
us with all good things and we live in a new world were we have been
given rule over the earth.
But instead of holding onto our
convictions and growing in our new desires we are threaten and forced to
compromise. And this is where the hate comes. Because we do not hate
holy things but we hate unholy things , those things that come from
scorn and abuse. But how can we have a good hate and yet be harmless as
doves and wise as serpents?
We can bring all of our hate to God
and use it to advance with a renewed conviction that we will never be
moved. Because once you begin to move from your former love, then you
begin to take and own what is not rightfully yours. As long as you are
free in the use of gifts then you are free to do as you please but when
you reject Gods grace then you are in bondage to the things and the
people. And so we are free to bring all of our hate to God. Because God
promises that no one can stop us from advancing. No enemy shall over
come us.
When we express what the situation is in our lives and
we begin to release our hate to God then we get wisdom and authority. We
begin to move according to Gods time table. And Gods time table is
really slow. When we are moving really slow then we are not in danger of
being two personalities. When we are waiting on God then we are not
endanger of building hypocrisy. God wants us to be freed from the inside
out. So that His word will begin to flourish in us and we will be made
to dwell in the light of His glory. When we begin to look to His word
then we are raised up above this world and we begin to experience a
heavenly joy and praise that gives us more confidence that God is on the
throne and He will lead us to all that we need. When we look at Christ
and we see the glory of God we build a conviction in our hearts that we
stand on a rock and we cannot be moved.
| 1186
|
Forums / Theology Forum / The Covenant Avenging Sword: John Arrowsmith
|
on: May 29, 2012, 11:23:19 AM
|
I will bring a Sword upon you, that shall avenge the quarrell of my Covenant. Lev. 26 25 The
personal prayer of the righteous..Ps 17 13 Rise up, Lord, confront
them, bring them down; with your sword rescue me from the wicked.Here
is a mixture of Nosannas and Anathemas the two mounts Geruzim and Ebal
meet in this chapter. Five blessings are promised in case of obedience,
from the third to the fortieth, no less then four times five judgements
threatened in case of rebellion, as Fiscator reckons up in his analyses,
Such is the course of Divine providence:where the Iniquities breaks
fast, Calamities will be sure to dine, to sup where it dines, and to
lodge where it suppes. Justice requires that the cries of sinne should
be answered with an echo of wrath. Witness the words before my Text, If
you will not be reformed by these things, but will walk contrary unto me
then will i also walk contrary unto you and will punish you yet seven
times for you sins. Words that well defervea gloss, and with your leave
shall have it. If you will not be reformed by these things , to wit, the
aforementioned plagues. The end of Gods striking is to reform, the end
of his reforming , to save.He embitters the creatures as with Aloes to
wean us from them, and give our fouls occasion of seeking to those full
breasts of the Lord Jesus, which do even for want of drawing, and run
most freely when they are most heartily suckered. For men to continue
unreformed notwithstanding these things is a beastly,yea diabolical part
5 senseless and ye brutish among the people , he that chastise the
heathen shall (He) not be correct? Psalm 94 10 we say, Vnderst and ye
devilish among the people, for to be always suffering , never repenting,
is the property of infernal spirits. Trying my best at copying this old english. Psalm
94 Is a prayer of the king on behalf of Gods remnant who are suffering
at the hands of the" proud". The proud are those who have ignored God
and will not have God in their thoughts. When men avoid Gods word they
devise evil schemes to overthrow Gods rule and Gods King. The contrast
is God who rules from heaven and man who tries to thwart Gods purposes
and thus to attack Gods elect. This King in heaven considers all the
thoughts of man as futile. That is these thoughts translate into schemes
to destroy the righteous and God will bring these schemes to be the
judgement that the schemers have created. They refuse to reform so that
God will draw His sword and while the elect suffer because of these
destructive ways God really is preparing the wicked to fall into their
own schemes. That is Gods thoughts endure forever while nations cease to
exist.
This
is sort of like a Psalm with the circumstances as Israel mounted on
their horses and lined up to assume their positions for a battle. And
the question is Why are we going to war? And so the king rises to his
throne and sits to speak. And as the king speaks then God begins to
ascend to His throne. So God makes His pronouncements as the word of
deliverance. (My opinion this is the Lamb taking the scroll.) And so you
have this argument that is building a case that will eventually have
God sitting on His throne so that His kingdom is established not only in
the heavens but on the earth. And this is kind of like a recurring
theme of redemption of nations rising and falling. mbG
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
1187
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Calvin's Doctrine of the Knowledge of God: Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield
|
on: May 28, 2012, 09:01:47 AM
|
|
The elements of Calvin's thought here, it will
readily be seen, reduce themselves to a few great fundamental
principles. These embrace particularly the following doctrines: the
doctrine of the innate knowledge of God; the doctrine of the general
revelation of God in nature and history; the doctrine of the special
revelation of God and its embodiment in Scriptures; the doctrine of the
noetic effects of sin; the doctrine of the testimony of the Holy Spirit.
That we may do justice to his thought we must look in some detail at
his treatment of each of these doctrines and of the subordinate topics
which are necessarily connected with them.
I. NATURAL REVELATION
That
the knowledge of God is innate (I. iii. 3), naturally engraved on the
hearts of men (I. iv. 4), and so a part of their very constitution as
men (I. iii. 1), that it is a matter of instinct (I. iii. 1, I. iv. 2),
and every man is self-taught it from his birth (I. iii. 3), Calvin is
thoroughly assured. He lays it down as incontrovertible fact that "the
human mind, by natural instinct itself, possesses some sense of a deity"
(I. iii. 1, ad init. et ad fin.; 3 - sensus divinitatis or deitatis),3
and defends the corollaries which flow from this fact, that the
knowledge of God is universal and indelible. All men know there is a
God, who has made them, and to whom they are responsible. No savage is
sunk so low as to have lost this sense of deity, which is wrought into
his very constitution: and the degradation of men's worship is a proof
of its ineradicableness - since even such dehumanization as this worship manifests has not obliterated it (I.
iii. 1). It is the precondition of all religion, without which no
religion would ever have arisen; and it forms the silent assumption of
all attempts to expound the origin of religion in fraud or political artifice, as it does also of all corruptions of religion, which find their nerve in men's incurable religious propensities
(I. iii. 1). The very atheists testify to its persistence in their
ill-concealed dread of the deity they profess to despise (I. iv. 2); and
the wicked, strive they ever so hard to banish from their consciousness
the sense of an accusing deity, are not permitted by nature to forget
it (I. iii. 3). Thus the cases alike of the savages, the atheists, and
the wicked are made contributory to the establishment of the fact, and
the discussion concludes with the declaration that it is by this innate
knowledge of God that men are discriminated from the brutes, so that for
men to lose it would be to fall away from the very law of their
creation (I. iii. 3, ad fin.).4
|
Remove
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
1188
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: Evolution vs Intelligent Design - In Search of the Black Cat
|
on: May 28, 2012, 08:37:25 AM
|
Hey Tom, I tried to quote your comment to me but after twice I've given up. So, I've read your comment three times and found nothing rude. (maybe I'm too dumb to be insulted) LOL But
I also found nothing that I thought that I disagreed with so maybe try
being rude enough to get me to understand where we disagree. Thanks Bro
I
apologize for the difficulty. Actually ive had good relationships with
some people on here. And i dont think i would disagree with you Poppy. I
think youve been pretty balanced in your writing. That last post i
wrote was not to disagree with you. I think there are a few arguments
that are said from both sides arminininst and Worm Calvinistic theology
that get my feathers up. I dont think i disagree with someone just to
disagree. Thats why people like TB, Bill and the women ive rarely had a
strong disagreement with them. And in fact i am kind of in
agreement with Bill because he talks about the old faith based
salvation. And i believe there is a kind of work of the Spirit like
dedication. Bill understands my position from the 70s revival movement.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
1189
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: Evolution vs Intelligent Design - In Search of the Black Cat
|
on: May 27, 2012, 01:02:40 PM
|
Ignorance is bliss but what if: He didn't split them at all. Perhaps Adam, being the first man, was created perfect. Perhaps
He, the creator of DNA and genetic code, took the rib, switched on or
off a few genomes for desired effect such as the xy chromosone and
whatever else He thought suitable for Adam's helpmeat/completer, Eve,
mother of humanity, and wahla! finished. And God saw that it was very good.
Adam
lived some 900+ years after his fall from Eden, I think its safe to say
he did not poccess the genetic mutations we find common in our society
today which makes us grow old before our time. Even after God limited our days to 120yrs, most of us have a hard time keeping our bodies in tune for that long. Those microevolutionary changes in our DNA over time have nearly all had negative effects to our longevity. Perhaps
sometime we could discuss the very few fossils found that have led some
scientist to conclude that man evolved from or along side other
homosapiens such as cromagnon man and neandethal man? Sorry my spelling sucks. I dont read enough cause it hurts my eyes after about ten minutes.
Poppy
i dont mean to be rude but i will interject here. I believe that God
created the source as well as the effects of that source if extended in
time to be all in one day. And so I believe that God is over second
causes as a continuous created activity. So that our knowledge of the
physical universe as compared to Gods knowledge does not just involve
God understanding things by process as we do but that all things
including the position of particles are in His sight. God knows all
things intimately at one time. And this is what is so cool about the
real self. God who is in Himself the image of the real good created us
as individuals so that we are only good because God created us for His
purpose and those purposes are in God that end in Him getting the glory
because all that He creates is good. Now here is the thing. God
knows the intimate detail of our genetic life. I believe unless God has
determined before time that we would have disease and the exact time we
experience it and its duration that our spiritual experience is related
to our physical wellness. So that He compares our lives as a spiritual
worship to Him. Which involves a gift of new life in us. So that the
more we know God the more we see that His thoughts are beyond our
ability to know. And so we are drawn to depend upon Him in a way in
which we experience this new life as if we were feasting at a table of
all the good foods. So this is compared to health to our bones. Its kind
of compared to being filled with the Spirit. So we experience a kind of
personality that moves from our head to our toes in God converting us.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
1190
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: Evolution vs Intelligent Design - In Search of the Black Cat
|
on: May 27, 2012, 12:47:39 PM
|
Beacon, That is a good point that I had not considered. Let me think about that aspect and I will respond shortly. MERKS, Another
good question. Here are some facts related to your question. Proteins
show remarkable sameness within species. For example, human insulin is
the same for every person, the same amino acid sequence exactly. When
you move from one species to another, the picture changes, the proteins
are not the same. A practical illustration: for years in medicine we
used insulin extracted from pig pancreas to treat diabetes. It worked,
but there were problems related to the differences between pig and human
insulin in their amino acid sequence. Now we have the technology to
incorporate the gene for human insulin into bacteria and other
microorganisms, and they produce the human insulin that we need. A much
improved drug has resulted, and today diabetics are treated with human
rather than pig insulin. So yes, there is remarkable homology
(sameness) for the DNA that codes for different proteins and other
components of the human body. The question Beacon asked will require
more research on my part, that of whether two individuals could provide
the genentic diversity to provide for the variety of phenotypes (these
are the physical expression of the genetics) that we see in the human
race. But I would think that the odds of two genetically
complete humans giving rise to the human race are much better than
beginning with one single cell bacteria  Got
to go for now. Thanks everyone for the encouragement. Putting these
thoughts down is really helping me get started on a book I am planning
that will bear the same name as this thread. Pray for me that I will
have time and the singleness of mind to complete this project. Bill
Bill
i was wondering if because of the ongoing process of generations in
having children , if there was a degeneration in the gene pool? And
whether mixing races in the physical sense would be aversive to the
propagation of health...not because a race is evil but because of sin
and corruption that accompanies different races and the natural
susceptibility in the mixing. And i was wondering how much the
scientific discoveries have offset this natural diluting of the gene
pool as well as the negative environmental effects through disease.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
1192
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: What's the point of being religious?
|
on: May 27, 2012, 10:48:23 AM
|
So if "being good" isn't the point, then what is "the point"?
Gaining
salvation through faith in Christ, and then sharing with others the
great truth you've found. Everything else? Dust in the wind.
If someone knows they aren't "perfect", then isnt it a waste of time to dwell and obsess on it "religiously"?
Yes! As far as our relationship with God is concerned. Hence the scripture that salvation is by faith not works. Eph 2:8
You know most people think Christianity and religions are simply about being good.
Most
non-Christians, the world at large, and sadly some Christians think
this about Christianity. We need to tell them otherwise. That
Christianity is about Christ - hence the name. Other religions
ARE about being good, i.e. works, whether they are based on
reincarnation, whatever. This is why Christianity is the only unique
faith in the world. Only Christianity is about what Christ has done.
All other belief systems, bar none, are about what man does or fails to
do. This is why they are so vain and prideful. A true understanding
of faith in Christ requires the surrender of pride and the idea that
there is anything we can possibly add to what Christ has already done
for us - if we only believe and accept it.
This is not
necessarily true. The church is not primarily a mission church but its a
Shepherd church. Because the church is a place where the members are
built up. The purpose of being Christ to other people is to prepare the
people to go out into the world. So the church does not involve
themselves in how the people are going to live in the world but they
teach sound doctrine as the way to correct and discipline. I
disagree that the salvation message as it is spoken to the world should
be preached in the church every week. But the church is a place where
the gospel is a christian gospel. Its a gospel that provides grace to
those who need it. The believers then are built up in grace and they go
out and preach that grace to the world. So the church is the support of
the people both spiritually and physically. The health of the church is
seen in the success of its people. The church is not a place to involve
themselves in telling people what they already know. Its to teach sound
doctrine so that the people are built up.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
1194
|
Members Only / Purgatory / Re: The Art of War
|
on: May 26, 2012, 03:18:38 PM
|
|
Verses from The Banishing Sword of the Covenant...
Micah 2 2 Woe to those who plan iniquity, to those who plot evil on their beds! At morning’s light they carry it out because it is in their power to do it. 2 They covet fields and seize them, and houses, and take them. They defraud people of their homes, they rob them of their inheritance. Jer. 47 6 “‘Alas, sword of the Lord, how long till you rest? Return to your sheath; cease and be still.’ 7 But how can it rest when the Lord has commanded it, when he has ordered it to attack Ashkelon and the coast?” Jer. 50 25 The Lord has opened his arsenal and brought out the weapons of his wrath, for the Sovereign Lord Almighty has work to do in the land of the Babylonians. Ez. 30 25
I will strengthen the arms of the king of Babylon, but the arms of
Pharaoh will fall limp. Then they will know that I am the Lord, when I
put my sword into the hand of the king of Babylon and he brandishes it
against Egypt.
Deu. 32 40 I lift my hand to heaven and solemnly swear: As surely as I live forever, 41 when I sharpen my flashing sword and my hand grasps it in judgment, I will take vengeance on my adversaries and repay those who hate me. 42 I will make my arrows drunk with blood, while my sword devours flesh: the blood of the slain and the captives, the heads of the enemy leaders.” Jer. 46 15 Why will your warriors be laid low? They cannot stand, for the Lord will push them down. 16 They will stumble repeatedly; they will fall over each other. They will say, ‘Get up, let us go back to our own people and our native lands, away from the sword of the oppressor.’ Jer. 50 35 “A sword against the Babylonians!” declares the Lord— “against those who live in Babylon and against her officials and wise men! 36 A sword against her false prophets! They will become fools. A sword against her warriors! They will be filled with terror. 37 A sword against her horses and chariots and all the foreigners in her ranks! They will become weaklings. A sword against her treasures! They will be plundered. Jer 13 12
“Say to them: ‘This is what the Lord, the God of Israel, says: Every
wineskin should be filled with wine.’ And if they say to you, ‘Don’t we
know that every wineskin should be filled with wine?’ 13 then tell them,
‘This is what the Lord says: I am going to fill with drunkenness all
who live in this land, including the kings who sit on David’s throne,
the priests, the prophets and all those living in Jerusalem. 14 I will
smash them one against the other, parents and children alike, declares
the Lord. I will allow no pity or mercy or compassion to keep me from
destroying them.’”
Prov. 29 7 The righteous care about justice for the poor, but the wicked have no such concern. 8 Mockers stir up a city, but the wise turn away anger. Rev. 6 3
When the Lamb opened the second seal, I heard the second living
creature say, “Come!” 4 Then another horse came out, a fiery red one.
Its rider was given power to take peace from the earth and to make
people kill each other. To him was given a large sword. Jer. 32 37
I will surely gather them from all the lands where I banish them in my
furious anger and great wrath; I will bring them back to this place and
let them live in safety. 38 They will be my people, and I will be their
God. 39 I will give them singleness of heart and action, so that they
will always fear me and that all will then go well for them and for
their children after them.
|
Remove
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
1198
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Called to Suffer:
|
on: May 26, 2012, 12:08:46 PM
|
Suffer for doing what is wrong is a reference
to a reprobate. How can God prove that suffering for wrong when the next
verse He says that He took the place of those who were not justified in
their actions and made them just? And in fact the believer not only has
a promise that God who is the only one who is justified in His acts
also forgets our sins and separates us from our sins as far as the east
is from the west? How does God justify sinners so that He gets
the glory? He actually promises to be with them by sending to them His
Holy Spirit who is an our advocate. The Holy Spirit works with the word
to vindicate Gods people. How does the Holy Spirit act on our behalf? He
actually works through our prayers. So all the scripture is God
breathed and is to our own profit. The Holy Spirit ask us to curse all
those who do not have our best interest. Because all of Gods people
practice grace. The Holy Spirit will not always strive with those who
strive with the grace covenant. He will vindicate Gods righteousness in
accusing His children before God. let me get that verse. Leviticus
26:25 25 And I will bring the sword on you to avenge the breaking of the
covenant. When you withdraw into your cities, I will send a plague
among you, and you will be given into enemy hands. 1. War is a judgment of God’s own bringing. 2. The sword is an instrument of vengeance, and, 3. That which the sword comes to avenge, is some quarrel of God’s Covenant http://www.puritandownloads.com/swrb/products/The-Covenant%252dAvenging-Sword-by-John-Arrowsmith.htmlI wished i could get this book on line. If any one can find it give me the link.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
1199
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: What's the point of being religious?
|
on: May 26, 2012, 11:44:49 AM
|
G i think we live in a day when we like to
divide all of these circumstances up and make them agree with the
scripture. And i think this was what they were doing in Joshuas day.
They were saying that God was not able to provide them with all they
need so they believed that how the other nations appeared to them as
successful was the answer to one problem. And so they were wavering
between the success they saw by the nations and the promises of God. And
this is why we need to believe the whole gospel. Because the gospel
describes the awful state that all men are in. And it kind of creates
these second causes in light of the eternal purposes of God rather than a
direct reflection of these individual cultures. Because the gospel
gives us causes that go farther than cleaning up little messes. It
provides us with the argument that the grace of God is the only hope for
man not falling into more evil and more depravity. The argument of the
gospel is that all men are in a hopeless state because of sin and the
only remedy is God coming to man. How does God come to man? He
comes to man as the one who provides for the entire race of man at each
moment of all mens lives. So Gods view as a covenant keeping God is that
all of the events in this world are brought about by His word and it is
not always known to man as to the purposes of God in acting on this
universal scale. From mans view what needs to be accomplished is the
temptation to take the glory of God and provide a confidence in these
national purposes. And so God is saying why are you vacillating in
between pragmatism and grace? And so God has made it so that the message
is more important than the apparent success.  And
this is why it is so hard for men to get along because if everyone was
in a hopeless state and one person received grace dont you think that
the people would encourage that person as the basis of glorifying God
for His work being accomplished? But instead because of sin people think
that sin and treachery are not the same thing. They do not see sin as
something a person is as being defined in his disposition but they see
the evil act or the bad behavior and they forget that they were or are
in a hopeless state and for the grace of God goes everyone. So because
men believe that they can define their own terms then they actually
become their own god. And this is what is so serious about grace
. Its made to kind of hit you in the face. How can a sinner claim to be
righteous in the company of other sinners who care nothing about God
and yet appear to be better citizens? If i were making the plan i would
save someone and then make them examples of my plan by them acting in a
way in which everyone would look and say this guy is a class act. But
I think God knows people better than they know themselves. There is a
number of angles i could take here but i will take this one. God figures
that no matter how good a person appears in a depraved society ... I
mean look a Job.. 
the most righteous man in the universe... and yet no one stepped
forward to give Job a real view but they picked on his sin and weakness.
In other words their treachery was worse than Job standing as guilty in
the works covenant. This is a problem that only God can cure.
He promises to love His people not according to their sins but according
to His name. And yet sometimes His people are worse than those who are
treacherously pointing fingers. I do not know why God made it this way
but i think it was because God who is unchangeable establishes a
relationship through His covenant and is not a pragmatic God who reacts
like a drunk. In other words God is more concerned for grace than He is
that His children always appear innocent.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
1200
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Calvin's Doctrine of the Knowledge of God: Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield
|
on: May 25, 2012, 09:26:55 PM
|
|
Drawn out a little more into detail, this
teaching is as follows. The knowledge of God is given in the very same
act by which we know self. For when we know self, we must know it as it
is: and that means we must know it as dependent, derived, imperfect, and responsible being.
To know self implies, therefore, the co-knowledge with self of that on
which it is dependent, from which it derives, by the standard of which
its imperfection is revealed, to which it is responsible. Of course, such a knowledge of self postulates a knowledge of God,
in contrast with whom alone do we ever truly know self: but this only
the more emphasises the fact that we know God in knowing self, and the
relative priority of our knowledge of two objects of knowledge which we
are conscious only of knowing together may for the moment be left
undetermined. Meanwhile, it is clear than man has an instinctive and
ineradicable knowledge of God, which, moreover, must produce appropriate
reactions in his thought, feeling, and will, whence arises what we call
religion. But these reactions are conditioned by the state of the soul
which reacts. Although, then, man cannot avoid possessing a knowledge of
God, and this innate knowledge of God is quickened and developed by the
richest manifestations of God in nature and providence, which no man
can escape either perceiving or so far apprehending, yet the actual
knowledge of God which is framed in the human soul is affected by the
subjective condition of the soul.
The
soul, being corrupted by sin, is dulled in its instinctive apprehension
of God; and God's manifestation in nature and history is deflected in
it.
Accordingly the testimony of nature to God is insufficient that sinful man should know Him aright, and God has therefore supernaturally revealed Himself to His people and deposited this revelation of Himself in written Scriptures.
In these Scriptures alone, therefore, do we possess an adequate
revelation of God; and this revelation is attested as such by
irresistible external evidence and attests itself as such by such marks of inherent divinity that no normal mind can resist them.
But the sin-darkened minds to which it appeals are not normal minds,
but disordered with the awful disease of sin. What is to give subjective
effect in a sin-blinded mind to even a direct revelation from God? The revelation of God is its own credential.
It needs no other light to be thrown upon it but that which emanates
from itself: and no other light can produce the effect which its own
splendor as a revelation of God should effect. But all fails when the
receptivity is destroyed by sin. For sinners, therefore, there is
requisite a repairing operation upon their souls before the light of the
Word itself can accredit itself to them as light.
This
repairing operation on the souls of sinful men by which they are
enabled to perceive light is called the testimony of the Holy Ghost:
which is therefore just the subjective action of the Spirit of God on
the heart, by virtue of which it is opened for the perception and
reception of the objective revelation of God.
The
testimony of the Spirit cannot, then, take the place of the objective
revelation of the Word: it is no revelation in this strict sense. It
presupposes the objective revelation and only prepares the heart to
respond to and embrace it. But the objective revelation can take no
effect on the unprepared heart.
What
the operation of the Spirit on the heart does, then, is to implant, or
rather to restore, a spiritual sense in the soul by which God is
recognized in His Word.
When this spiritual sense has
been produced the necessity of external proofs that the Scriptures are
the Word of God is superseded:
the
Word of God is as immediately perceived as such as light is perceived as
light, sweetness as sweetness - as immediately and as inamissibly.
The
Christian's knowledge of God, therefore, rests no doubt on an
instinctive perception of God native to man as man, developed in the
light of a patefaction of God which pervades all nature and history; but
particularly on an objective revelation of God deposited in Scriptures
which bear in themselves their own evidence of their divine origin, to
which every spiritual man responds with the same strength of conviction with which he recognizes light as light. This is the basis which Calvin in his " Institutes " places beneath his systematic exposition of the knowledge of God.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment