Sunday, November 8, 2015

3226  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Reformed Doctrine on: July 18, 2010, 03:42:02 PM
mbG quoting someone?:  "The work of applying God's grace is a unitary process given to the elect simultaneously. This is instantaneous, but there is definitely a causal order (regeneration giving rise to all the rest). Though these benefits cannot be separated, it is helpful to distinguish them. Therefore, instead of imposing a chronological order we should view these as a unitary work of God to bring us into union with Christ. We must always keep in mind that the orders expressed in the following articles occur together or happen simultaneously like heat and fire. All aspects of the work of God continue together throughout the life of a Christian."

K_k:  Yes, that is what i was saying.  These breakdowns that separate reformism from armenianism are just -isms.  They are artificial orderings of the one event that includes all the points each camp disagrees with the other, about the ordering of.  It is an artificial distinction that causes division, not unification.

mbG quoting wilder: "Jesus is Lord [over all] and he will soon be invading with His armies. He is offering pardon in advance of His invasion and should you receive the pardon and ally yourself with Him now before He invades, when he comes you will be considered His ally and He will raise you to Kingship."

K-K;  Salvation is more than just allying ourselves to a coming King.  It is receiving the unending Life of that King into ourselves as our only hope.  Many who think they have "chosen the side of Jesus" will be surprised when He says "I never knew you."  We don't "pick His team" from a position of strength, but we can only surrender to His love in our powerlessness and poverty of spirit.

You have stated in the past that you believe in universal justification that depends upon the will of man. I dont think you have a neutral position. If there is 12 steps then obviously you are dogmatic in your beliefs... a bit of hypocrisy? I could see where you would agree with anything that works. What say you?
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3227  Forums / Main Forum / Re: You're not serving enough! on: July 18, 2010, 01:21:13 PM
Yes, i agree.  But there is still a strong element in Christ's teaching that challenges us strongly to "walk the talk" so to speak.  He didn't just encourage, but also commanded in love.  He used examples and parables similar in some ways to the pig-is-committed.

For example, sower and the seed, the funds left with servants to invest, the rich young ruler told to sell all he has and give to the poor.  There has to be a balance between encouragement and direct in-your-face challenge, confrontational though gentle.

In appreciating Jesus as the physician to the sick, we may underplay His call to complete dedication.  How many times do we hear these verses being quoted these days?

Matthew 16:24
"Then Jesus said to His disciples, “If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me.  For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it."

Luke 14:25-27
Now great multitudes went with Him. And He turned and said to them,  “If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and his own life also, he cannot be My disciple.  And whoever does not bear his cross and come after Me cannot be My disciple."

We know He didn't mean to emotionally detest our parents, spouse, children and siblings.  But He did mean that compared to our commitment to Him, all personal attachments to relatives would be like night compared to day.  Yes?

This is not entirely true. It was not an equal treatment toward the weak and fearful with the self righteous and religious. Jesus saved all of His threats and His hard sayings for the self sufficient. He even bared them from the eternal church while He healed the sick and encouraged the down hear ted. The church is not a place for social butterflies. Its a place for the hurting. Its a kind of medical focus on problems and solutions with a lot of prayer and encouragement. Thats what James is talking about. Doing things for undeserved people .. not necessary people who are going to be of great value in name and monies. We are going backwards to be blessed by God alone.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3228  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Surrender\Obedience a requirement for salvation? on: July 18, 2010, 01:11:15 PM
st and Pj ... you all are too kind.... i cant go wrong just writing what i find in His word.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3229  Forums / Main Forum / Re: You're not serving enough! on: July 18, 2010, 12:24:59 PM
Is it alright for a pastor to preach about "how committed you are to the church" by mentioning names of certain people who are always there, every Sunday, no matter what the circumstance in their lives?  I find it wrong to compare people and I think it's judgemental.   My pastor is constantly talking about the story of the pig and the chicken and how the chicken isn't commited to the meal but the pig is and that he wants people who are committed and not just helping out.   I think this is harsh, I mean isn't God the only one who can tell us how and when to serve?
I will go out on a limb here. I think we should compare our church relationship to how we talk to our wives. That tells me that it is about developing relationships. Thats why the bible talks about encouragement more than it does confrontation in the church. Cause the mark of a reprobate is they are defined in their sin as treacherous. The example is Judas... who turned Jesus in for 30 pieces of silver. Judas was on the inside of the leadership of the church. What did Jesus do when He was being arrested? He kissed Judas.
Here we the Man who encouraged more people on this earth... not only the church but every one who was sick. He basically eliminated  all the diseases from the earth. I think this is the standard of conduct about encouragement. The church is for those who struggle... not for the healthy. 
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3230  Forums / Politics Forum / Re: The incredible shrinking economy on: July 18, 2010, 04:42:07 AM
IACOCCA SPEAKS OUT ON OBAMA
Still an interesting man at 82 years young.

 Just as true today as it was when his book first came out. He was,
and still is, a brilliant businessman! Often we need to be reminded of
Iococca's words.
  Remember Lee Iacocca, the man who rescued Chrysler Corporation from
its death throes?  He's now 82 years old and has a new book,
'Where Have All The Leaders Gone?'.

 Lee Iacocca Says:
 "Am I the only guy in this country who's fed up with what's
happening? Where the hell is our outrage with this so called
president? We should be screaming bloody murder! We've got a gang of
tax cheating clueless leftists trying to steer our ship of state right
over a cliff, we've got corporate gangsters stealing us blind, and we
can't even run a ridiculous cash-for-clunkers program without losing
$26 billion of the taxpayers' money, much less build a hybrid car. But
instead of getting mad, everyone sits around and nods their heads when
the politicians say, 'trust me the economy is getting better...'

 Better? You've got to be kidding. This is America, not the damned
'Titanic.' I'll give you a sound bite: 'Throw all the Democrats out
along with Obama!'
   You might think I'm getting senile, that I've gone off my rocker,
and maybe I have. But someone has to speak up. I hardly recognize this
country anymore.

 The most famous business leaders are not the innovators but the guys
in handcuffs.. While we're fiddling in Afghanistan,  Iran  is
completing their nuclear bombs and missiles and nobody seems to know
what to do. And the liberal press is waving 'pom-poms' instead of
asking hard questions. That's not the promise of the 'America' my
parents and yours traveled across the ocean for. I've had enough. How
about you?

 I'll go a step further. You can't call yourself a patriot if you're
not outraged. This is a fight I'm ready and willing to have. The
Biggest 'C' is Crisis! (Iacocca elaborates on nine C's of leadership,
with crisis being the first.)
   Leaders are made, not born. Leadership is forged in times of
crisis. It's easy to sit there with thumb up your butt and talk
theory. Or send someone else's kids off to war when you've never seen
a battlefield yourself. It's another thing to lead when your world
comes tumbling down.
  On September 11, 2001, we needed a  strong leader more than any
other time in our history. We needed a steady hand to guide us out of
the ashes. A hell of a mess, so here's where we stand.
   We're immersed in a bloody war now with no plan for winning and no
plan for leaving.  But our soldiers are dying daily.
   We're running the biggest deficit in the history of the world, and
it's getting worse every day!

 We've lost the manufacturing edge to Asia, while our once-great
companies are getting slaughtered by health care costs.
   Gas prices are going to skyrock again, and nobody in power has a
lucid plan to open drilling to solve the problem.  This country has
the largest oil reserves in the WORLD, and we cannot drill for it
because the politicians have been bought by the flea-hugging
environmentalists.
    Our schools are in a complete disaster because of the teachers
union. Our borders are like sieves and they want to give all illegals
amnesty and free healthcare.
   The middle class is being squeezed to death every day.
 These are times that cry out for leadership.
 But when you look around, you've got to ask: 'Where have all the
leaders gone?' Where are the curious, creative communicators? Where
are the people of character, courage, conviction, omnipotence, and
common sense? I may be a sucker for alliteration, but I think you get
the point.

 Name me a leader who has a better idea for homeland security than
making us take off our shoes in airports and throw away our shampoo.
   We've spent billions of dollars building a huge new bureaucracy,
and all we know how to do is react to things that have already
happened.
   Everyone's hunkering down, fingers crossed, hoping the government
will make it better for them. Now, that's just crazy... Deal with
life!
   Name me an industry leader who is thinking creatively about how we
can restore our competitive edge in manufacturing. Who would have
believed that there could ever be a time when 'The Big Three' referred
to Japanese car companies? How did this happen, and more important,
look what Obama did about it!

  Name me a government leader who can articulate a plan for paying
down the debit, or solving the energy crisis, or managing the health
care problem. The silence is deafening. But these are the crises that
are eating away at our country and milking the middle class dry.
   I have news for the Chicago gangsters in Congress. We didn't elect
you to turn this country into a losing European Socialist state. What
is everybody so afraid of? That some bonehead on NBC or CNN news will
call them a name? Give me a break. Why don't you guys show some spine
for a change?

 Had Enough? Hey, I'm not trying to be the voice of gloom and doom
here.  I'm trying to light a fire. I'm speaking out because I have
hope - I believe in America. In my lifetime, I've had the privilege of
living through some of  America 's greatest moments. I've also
experienced some of our worst crises: The 'Great Depression,' 'World
War II,' the 'Korean War,' the 'Kennedy Assassination,' the 'Vietnam
War,' the 1970's oil crisis, and the struggles of recent years since
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3231  Forums / Main Forum / Re: compassion? on: July 17, 2010, 05:38:06 PM
Jim: Re: Response #19. Thank you. You make some valid points. Thank you for highlighting them. One of the many benefits of a written discussion is that the participants can review everything. There are certainly many things I could have stated in a better manner, and perhaps more fairly or correctly. I have my human flaws (Technical, as well as socially within this christian forum.). I do not claim to have all the answers. Thats why I ask the questions. If I wanted to communicate with those who entirely agree with me, I would be in another forum. This forum was recommended to my by an evangelical, as a place I could get straight answers, not just spin. However, on my behalf, lets be fair here: I did not (do not) claim to know the entire forum's thoughts. That is why I qualified my remarks  as follows:("in reviewing the responses to my initial question(to date) it would appear...") If you care to read all your forum members' responses, I think you would arguably find some valid support for my very qualified (certainly not absolute) statement. Thats the way things appear to me. That was just an honest statement, that I left open for discussion, and response. Which I received.. I think sometimes, perhaps, people who have been instructed in absolute thinking, unfairly transfer that mindset to others. On another matter: You state (in part) that I "accuse God of intentionally causing all the suffering " (that I listed) and you also state that I "fail to show that in any real way". Now I am very confused. Please help me on the logic here: Are you telling me that God did not intentionally cause the flood, and did not foresee all of its consequences? (The drowning and starving of babies. The Terror of mothers seeing their children suffer and die.)

Sir... i havent responded because you came here and began to question our motives. And you were not compassionate toward us on this forum in that we hold these truths to be the most valuable truths. To us when you question the God of the universe its like attacking our own children. First because if God is God then there is no other to represent the highest inter personal qualifications of true holiness. Holiness as defined as all of His attributes in one concept. This includes His compassion.

 Now your question is out of a lack of understanding for the reason that the author gives the account of the flood. The bible is not a book of completed history. Its a true historical account when it highlights these events but it is not focused on what we consider important. It does not matter what we consider important to God. I think you can relate.

This account is part of a reasoning that Moses was pointing to about the fall of man back in Gen 1. Moses job was not to count the number of generations leading up to the flood. His job was to show the effects of the fall and the devastation that sin brought on mankind. One little sin... eating forbidden fruit cause great harm to the whole earth.
When ever the flood account is brought up in the bible it is compared to the worse generations of mankind. The reason is that God displayed His holy anger by destroying all of mankind in the flood and this account is the only account about this kind of destruction that is pointed to as an example of how God will deal with a wicked generation.
All of the words of the bible are God breathed so that we say they are a spoken word. Even tho they are written down yet they are living words. Every word in the bible is an eternal word. This is why Gods message to us comes in the language of relationship. Because God must save man to show His greatest love.  
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3232  Forums / Main Forum / Re: compassion? on: July 17, 2010, 03:05:51 PM
Toadbat: The (so called) cross" was a Roman Torture Rack. It was used regularly. Many men suffered on the cross before Jesus. It was common knowledge. Jesus never criticized the practice.These mortal men were often on the rack for days. They died  permanent deaths. Jesus was on the cross for only a few hours (.000001 per cent of his earthly life?) Jesus was "dead" for less than 72 hours (.000001 per cent of his earthly life?).(I do not present these percentages as accurate, only to make a point. It was an extremely small fraction of his time on earth.) Humans in the Flood suffered for days or weeks. Some humans have suffered debilitating pain every day of their lives for decades. Those humans who are in hell are experiencing excruciating pain for Eternity. To imply that Jesus suffered more is completely inaccurate.
This is not true... about the amount of suffering. Pilate had his professional abusers... put Jesus through the worse beating that any human being would experience. He not only died on the cross which was a cake walk compared to His body being ripped to shreds. If you study this you will find that a lot of people died before they were crucified from the blows. Jesus endured the most sever punishment that would have killed any other man. In fact God the Father designed the beating to go farther than normal. Watch the Passion of Christ. He was in shreds carrying the cross.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3233  Forums / Politics Forum / Re: John Stagliano on trial for making porn. on: July 17, 2010, 02:53:29 PM
Wow... Catholic school for all of us is rite around the corner. The head nun is going to be Hillary. hehe.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3234  Forums / Main Forum / Re: compassion? on: July 17, 2010, 02:37:55 PM
Toadbat: The (so called) cross" was a Roman Torture Rack. It was used regularly. Many men suffered on the cross before Jesus. It was common knowledge. Jesus never criticized the practice.These mortal men were often on the rack for days. They died  permanent deaths. Jesus was on the cross for only a few hours (.000001 per cent of his earthly life?) Jesus was "dead" for less than 72 hours (.000001 per cent of his earthly life?).(I do not present these percentages as accurate, only to make a point. It was an extremely small fraction of his time on earth.) Humans in the Flood suffered for days or weeks. Some humans have suffered dibilitating pain every day of their lives for decades. Those humans who are in hell are experiencing excrutiating pain for Eternity. To imply that Jesus suffered more is completely inaccurate.


Obviously i feel sorry for you ...  because you have gone far beyond the bounds of human decency. Even if you think all of us who love Jesus more than you could imagine are a bunch of duped idiots.. the least you can do is show some respect by being a bit more compassionate in your responses. We are basically defending ourselves at this point. Lets all try to be civil. 
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3235  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Surrender\Obedience a requirement for salvation? on: July 17, 2010, 01:57:47 PM
Surrendering is being taken from one place to another by a force that is too great to overcome. It isnt deciding to move but its being moved upon. Its not even thinking that there was a need to overcome a problem so that there was a trust that would be achieved by the great attempt. Surrendering is far above the imagination to experience what it really is. Most of the desperation of this life is not directly connected to our ability or lack of ability to learn to surrender. We only know what we think is surrender because we experience a kind of human imagination of the most noble attempt.
Thats why surrender cannot be attempted by a human being. It must be a place that we find that has no connection to our own ability. It is that experience where we have a long pause and then a movement of experience that brings our thinking as if we were peering into a new idea and yet only find more questions. It is being taken by a sense of wonder at something we cannot describe in human terms. Because we cannot surrender in harming ourselves in the excessive focus on finding that we have achieved something in return. If you jump off into the air you will dash yourself with many pains.
Surrender in finding a sense of other. It is being overcome by something that is near. It is not an idea that we put into practice but it is a communication of otherness to what we only have limited knowledge of what otherness is. This is why we have no ability to decide to surrender. Because we are talking about the desires between beings in communication of spiritual realities. In the presence of the weight of greater ability we find no other option. Surrender is finding a far greater glory that meets our view of looking on a Person as we are brought to only see a very small light of glory as we are brought under its power. There is nothing else that we can do.

We look at Jesus and we pray. Then we are only left with silence. But we know we have experienced something beyond this time sequence. We have gone away and we have been taken by someone and walked hand in hand into eternity. There is no one else around... just Him. There is a great danger because of where we have come from as we look back at this world. But it is too much attraction to want to go back there... in that ugly world. We dont want to leave eternity. There is no other powers that are pulling us down. We are like the man who had this other experience and this man has a look on his face ...its a puzzled look and in his eyes he has this blank stare as if he cannot put enough effort in masking what he has just experienced. He has been blinded to all of the attractions to this world. He has been silenced. There is something other than what people talk about that is filling his mind even when he talks. He sees something that he cannot describe in his attempt to connect what he knows they need because he knows something that he cannot put into words. He has been somewhere that has no definition in this world.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3236  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Quaker Churching. on: July 15, 2010, 02:32:07 PM
I thought a Quaker church was one where they passed out oatmeal to their senior members.... hehe
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3237  Forums / Main Forum / Re: compassion? on: July 15, 2010, 12:00:05 PM
Jim: Thank you for your response.  I seem to have inedequately expressed my thoughts.  My intended pont was that those who worship("condone") and adore ("celebrate") the Christian Diety, by implcation, are indeed "indifferent"  or "dismissive" to the specifically identified suffering that Diety caused; by either ignoring, or (sadly) "condoning, excusiing, celebrating", etc.  conduct that (I would hope) any decent human being would otherwise find disgusting, detestible, repulsive, psychotic, evil , or, as you suggest "satanic".  In reviewing the responses to my initial question (to date), it would appear that  the extent or degree of human suffering as the result of the "deluge" is not a matter of great interest or concern to the members of this forum (or Christians in general).  Or  is not even within their knowledge.  To me that is all very telling.  I would also suggest that to respond to the question "how many human beings died" with the answers "we all die", or "why do you want to know ?", constitutes being dismissive.  Would those same answers be given by a Christian to the questions "how many people died on 9-11 ?", or, "how many people died in German concentration camps ?" Thank you.  I hope to continue this discussion.  Evahs Ambrub

I ve thought about what you said... the difference between your thinking and mine is that i think God has a just cause for punishing those people in that flood by death... you seem to be blaming God.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3238  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Reformed Doctrine on: July 15, 2010, 10:03:48 AM
"the order of salvation."


Latin, "the order of salvation." The ordo salutis is the theological doctrine that deals with the logical sequencing of the benefits of redemption as we are united to Christ which are applied to us by the Holy Spirit. This first thing to remember is that we must never separate the benefits (regeneration, justification, sanctification) from the Benefactor (Jesus Christ). The entire process (election, redemption, regeneration, etc.) is the work of God in Christ and is by grace alone. Election is the superstructure of our ordo salutis, but not itself the application of redemption. Regeneration, the work of the Holy Spirit which brings us into a living union with Christ, has a causal priority over the other aspects of the process of salvation. God opens our eyes, we see. God circumcises/ unplugs our ears, we hear. Jesus calls a dead and buried Lazarus out of the grave, he comes; In the same way, the Holy Spirit applies regeneration, (opening our spiritual eyes and renewing our affections), infallibly resulting in faith. All the benefits of redemption such as conversion (faith & repentance), justification, sanctification and perseverance presuppose the existence of spiritual life. The work of applying God's grace is a unitary process given to the elect simultaneously. This is instantaneous, but there is definitely a causal order (regeneration giving rise to all the rest). Though these benefits cannot be separated, it is helpful to distinguish them. Therefore, instead of imposing a chronological order we should view these as a unitary work of God to bring us into union with Christ. We must always keep in mind that the orders expressed in the following articles occur together or happen simultaneously like heat and fire. All aspects of the work of God continue together throughout the life of a Christian.

Historically in the Church there has been disagreement about the order of salvation, especially between those in the Reformed and Arminian camps. The following two perspectives of God's order in carrying out His redemptive work reveals the stark contrast between these two main historic views. Keep in mind that both viewpoints are based on the redemptive work which Christ accomplished for His people in history:

In the Reformed camp, the ordo salutis is 1) election, 2) predestination, 3) gospel call 4) inward call 5) regeneration, 6) conversion (faith & repentance), 7) justification, Cool sanctification, and 9) glorification. (Rom 8:29-30)

In the Arminian camp, the ordo salutis is 1) outward call 2) faith/election, 3) repentance, 4) regeneration, 5) justification, 6) perseverance, 7) glorification.

Notice the crucial difference in the orders of regeneration and faith. While the Reformed position believes spiritual life is a prerequisite for the existence of the other aspects of salvation, the Arminians believe that fallen, natural man retains the moral capacity to receive or reject the gospel of his own power. Even with the help of grace he still must find it within himself to believe or reject Christ. This has broad implications and raises questions like why does one man believe and not another? You might also notice that, according to Arminians, election is dependent on faith, not the other way around. This is no small matter ...understanding the biblical order, while keeping in mind its unitary process, is crucial and has a profound impact on how one views God, the gospel, and the Bible as a whole.
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3239  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Surrender\Obedience a requirement for salvation? on: July 15, 2010, 09:42:36 AM
The bible talks about an obedience from the heart. With this obedience we can say that we have done everything that He requires. This obedience is simply an act of faith in turning to Christ. So when we come to Christ we receive salvation. This obedience apprehends what is given by grace.
If we say that in coming to Christ we need to repent and obey everything that He demands then there are always going to be things left undone and we will never be acceptable. That means that we may have sin that we cannot overcome at the time we are required to obey. All through our lives our consciences will show us where we have not met the demands of obedience. So it is important that we understand that our apprehending by faith is our acknowledging that we cannot obey in all of our actions so that we are only required to obey the gospel. Turning to Christ as our only hope of meeting the requirements. And trusting that He will work in us to will and to do.
The scripture says that we are always in the position to be judged. We are just like those who do not understand. If God were to make an accounting (keeping a record of our sins) of our lives then no man could stand! This is why our confidence is not in ourselves. Because our position about obedience may show by what we say if we are arrogant and proud.
This is why we are reminded over and over again that there is no one who understands ... there is no one who seeks after God. All have turned aside... all together have become corrupted. But what separates us from the wicked?
Well we find a direct conflict with this world and the Devil. The world accuses us of all kinds of evils. The Devil accuses Gods elect so that He might destroy them. The Devil uses His children to destroy Gods elect comparing it to men eating bread. We are like bread because we have no recourse on our own. Its easy to destroy those who put all there confidence in Christ at the expense of their own safety . Our only hope is in obeying the gospel. Turning to Christ alone through faith alone by grace alone. That obedience is described as calling on God. We cannot find any recourse in any one else.

Dont take me out of context.. i am not to confident in this part... it always seems to encourage to be licentious... but it is what He says it is.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3240  Forums / Key Life Forum / Re: addiction versus life in christ. on: July 13, 2010, 12:22:47 PM
I am having to deal with schizophrenia and rage with an individual that is close to me. This is a physical problem. So it has opened my eyes to some things that i had not considered. A person can be subject to some dysfunction in the brain that can cause them to be helpless.

My observation is that this malady is mixed with a genetic tendency in how the emotional structure of the problem is worked out. In a way i believe that all people have a kind of resistance to these workings in which they could be susceptible to things in light of the health of their own spiritual immune system. Along with the tendencies that are created by the personality.

 I do not believe that the gospel can erase this entirely. But that it gives a person the ability to go at a pace in which they are presented with a healthy view of life while at the same time enjoying this spiritual medication to dull the pain of the malady. I am speaking about these tendencies as they relate to depression or other emotional disturbances.

Addiction is related to sin and sin is in our members. These things are a mystery but they are related to our practice from our youth.  I do not believe that a person can entirely eliminate these tendencies but i believe that the proper culture of doctrinal wholeness is essential to finding victory and yet getting back up immediately. Some of this association of guilt and shame is mixed with anger and we fail to see the deeper issue so most of the time i find people not hitting the mark about this. I think short term promises of freedom are lies. I mean in the normal use of the means.

I offer this against the back drop of the efforts made to alleviate these over burdening weights. There is a new effort to develop a community that trades sins in for the matching uniforms. It is morally driven. This is where things get messy. And i have learned by experience that people do not have the same demands for intellectual satisfaction. For instance some people who get into a desperate situation have a different way of trying to find some normalcy. But there are trade offs in how it is approached. I mean we are required to think differently as a way to grow. So it is balanced with a natural desire to live a quality life with our own responsibility to know our spiritual condition. Its Gods responsibility to reveal these things along the way or its not God at all.  
3242  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Hidden In God on: July 13, 2010, 10:46:38 AM
Hiding in God is not an idea that we have about His refuge. Because God is much greater in His attributes and abilities than human ideas. If we could define the unity of the Persons of the Trinity than we could copy Gods unity as we think about unity. But Gods protection is out of the most free Spirit to act upon us without our understanding! We are in a way shielded from the reality of all that exist in our relationship to the events and things of this world and our ability to influence our relationships to produce these qualifications that God only can produce. We do not have enough knowledge of the workings of reality in order to feel absolutely free in our own ideas of what needs to be done! This is why that is still a veil that we must endure unto when we will see.

This is why we must conclude that we are left with more questions than answers. We find there is a new morning because we do not find freedom in our knowledge of what that new morning will bring. So God out of His free grace leaves us in the dark in order that He might do what He knows is best because we would accuse God of not knowing if we had a complete knowledge of what is best. God is pleased to have us ask for every thing.. including our floundering in the dark because we are left to acknowledge the free acts of Gods grace.

This is where we find our comfort. We find it in God alone who has no reason for bringing about these states of comfort from our understanding. We rest in the fact that the God of all comfort knows what is best and we do not need to understand. When we give God that kind of freedom to be God then we are made to praise Him because that is acknowledging Him  as having the right to do as He wants. God will come. God comes and will not be silenced. God is God and we are made to find rest in His being what we do not understand.  
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3243  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Hidden In God on: July 13, 2010, 10:26:29 AM

mbG:  "Everyone is a sinner. That means there is a tendency to be as bad as we possibly can.  All people suffer from this tendency."

K_k:  I have always tried to be a little less bad than i possibly can.  I fail often at this, of course, but i "keep the faith".    rolleyes

mbG:  "We live a life in between guilt ... shame and love and acceptance. There is no in between state of personal redemption."

K_k:  Positionally, perhaps.  But, experiencially -- well that's a different story -- a state of in-between-ness seems to rule, at least in this life.  Hopefully slanting toward the latter instead of the former, via grace.

mbG:  "That is where all of these personal sorrows meet His work and then we are renewed. It was done many yrs ago on the cross and now it is finished. This is not serenity... this is true power and victory."

K_k:  In serenity is true power and victory, since it is merely fully trusting in Jesus and His completed/completing work in our lives.  But why quibble over words?  One man's sereneness may be another man's boredom.  IF you know what i mean....

The bible gives us the blue print for happiness. It is not a way that seems right in our own eyes. But its a way that we must go if we are to endure the troubles and sorrows of this life. Our sin will always be before us because we will never find perfect sinless ness in this life. So we are people who have been given this gracious disposition to know there is a far greater weight of glory that awaits us while at the same time we are concerned because of our sins.
These sorrows of life are always generated by a sense of helplessness and uncertainty. Because there are many arrows that we are pierced with that produce this uncertainty in how we are purposed to communicate on a level to others so that God will get the glory. In a way we are all given to an imagination that our personal troubles are our enemies and our appearance of righteousness is the cause of our influence to others.
But the world is a fallen world and we are all put in this flow of divine immunation to work as grace has caused us to a united hope as we identify with real sinners. It is not what we appear to others... or what we say that will move us one bit further to change but it is who we are and how we know ourselves as God is working out the details of this unity. We are so identified with Christ that we no longer live but Christ lives through us. We groan inwardly because of the course of the world as we await our full adoption as sons.
This is why we are silenced before God. We must conclude by our musing that there is no one who does good ... no not one. So that we might be united in our view of community. Because we are members of Christ body and we find in acknowledging that we are totally corrupted then we are more able to bless our brothers without a vanity that comes out of a feigned love. There is no reason to live in condemnation. There is no place to find comfort in blame. There is no reason to look at the past with an eye to regret. Because we all must come to an end of our thinking that we live outside of the light of the glory of God who is changing us from one glory to another out of a sense of the free grace and mercy of Christ. Sin no longer defines how we view time.  
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3244  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Could Jesus have sinned? on: July 13, 2010, 10:00:11 AM

Baptized infants can grow up to be young adults who have never known Christ but have always been told they are "christians".  So why would they need a Savior if they've already been "saved" at their infant baptism...

And satan pulls off another one.

Having been on both sides of this issue it seems i can see how men become entrenched in their particular orthodoxy. On the one side there is a tendency to view this as focus on appearance. On the other side the tendency is to place the ritual of baptism above the clear teaching of the entrance into salvation by regeneration.  Both of these extremes comes from a lack of attention to the details of the order of salvation. And that brings on a kind of exterior appearance of performing these acts of righteousness in this social acceptance.
This is why it is good for us to study the two views of baptism as accepted among the confessional community so that we can get a perspective of these tendencies. Because most of the clear teachings of the doctrines of grace historically have come from both views. There may be an epistemological and dispositional comfort zone in the attraction to one view over the other. I can see were infant baptism supports the dispositional qualities of regeneration over the believers baptism. Because we believe that it is not a matter of our confession that brings about salvation but it is the secret work of the Holy Spirit by the will of God alone given out of free grace to one who is like a child. And yet we both teach that baptism must be accompanied by regeneration. So that God is not limited to the act of baptism in order to work salvation in a person. 
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3245  Forums / Politics Forum / Re: The incredible shrinking economy on: July 12, 2010, 07:58:09 PM
"Many people who joined the middle class, especially those who joined in the last few years, have now fallen back. It's not over yet. Millions cannot make minimum payments on their credit cards, or are in default or foreclosure on their mortgages, or are on food stamps. Well over 100,000 people file for bankruptcy every month. Some 3 million homeowners are estimated to face foreclosure this year, on top of 2.8 million last year. Millions of homes are located next to or near a foreclosed home, and it is the latter that may determine the price of all the homes on the street. There have been dramatically sharp declines in home equity, representing cumulative losses in the trillions of dollars in what has long been the largest asset on the average American family's balance sheet. Most of those who lost their homes are hard-working, middle-class Americans who had lost their jobs. Now many have to use credit cards to pay for essentials and make ends meet, and they are running out of credit. Another $5 trillion has been lost from pensions and savings."




Mort Zuckerman: Obama Is Barely Treading Water
The president's problem is simple: the economy and jobs

By Mortimer B. Zuckerman

Posted: July 2, 2010
Print


The hope that fired up the election of Barack Obama has flickered out, leaving a national mood of despair and disappointment. Americans are dispirited over how wrong things are and uncertain they can be made right again. Hope may have been a quick breakfast, but it has proved a poor supper. A year and a half ago Obama was walking on water. Today he is barely treading water. Then, his soaring rhetoric enraptured the nation. Today, his speeches cannot lift him past a 45 percent approval rating.
Click here to find out more!

There is a widespread feeling that the government doesn't work, that it is incapable of solving America's problems. Americans are fed up with Washington, fed up with Wall Street, fed up with the necessary but ill-conceived stimulus program, fed up with the misdirected healthcare program, and with pretty much everything else. They are outraged and feel that the system is not a level playing field, but is tilted against them. The millions of unemployed feel abandoned by the president, by the Democratic Congress, and by the Republicans.

The American people wanted change, and who could blame them? But now there is no change they can believe in. Sixty-two percent believe we are headed in the wrong direction­—a record during this administration. All the polls indicate that anti-Washington, anti-incumbent sentiment is greater than it has been in many years. For the first time, Obama's disapproval rating has topped his approval rating. In a recent CBS News poll, there is a meager 15 percent approval rating for Congress. In all polls, voters who call themselves independents have swung against the administration and against incumbents.

Even some in Obama's base have turned, with 17 percent of Democrats disapproving of his job performance. Even more telling is the excitement gap. Only 44 percent of those who voted for him express high interest in this year's elections. That's a 38-point drop from 2008. By contrast, 71 percent of those who voted Republican last time express high interest in the midterm elections, above the level at this stage in 2008. And these are the people who vote.

Republicans are benefiting not because they have a credible or popular program—they don't—but because they are not Democrats. In a recent Wall Street Journal/NBC poll, nearly two thirds of those who favor Republican control of Congress say they are motivated primarily by opposition to Obama and Democratic policy. Disapproval of Congress is so widespread, a recent Gallup poll suggests, that by a margin of almost two to one, Americans would rather vote for a candidate with no experience than for an incumbent. Throw the bums out is the mood. How could this have happened so quickly?

The fundamental problem is starkly simple: jobs and the deepening fear among the public that the American dream is vanishing before their eyes. The economy's erratic improvement has helped Wall Street but has brought little support to Main Street. Some 6.8 million people have been unemployed in the last year for six months or longer. Their valuable skills are at risk, affecting their economic productivity for years to come. Add to this despairing army the large number of those only partially employed and those who have given up their search for work, and we have cumulative totals in the tens of millions.

Many people who joined the middle class, especially those who joined in the last few years, have now fallen back. It's not over yet. Millions cannot make minimum payments on their credit cards, or are in default or foreclosure on their mortgages, or are on food stamps. Well over 100,000 people file for bankruptcy every month. Some 3 million homeowners are estimated to face foreclosure this year, on top of 2.8 million last year. Millions of homes are located next to or near a foreclosed home, and it is the latter that may determine the price of all the homes on the street. There have been dramatically sharp declines in home equity
, representing cumulative losses in the trillions of dollars in what has long been the largest asset on the average American family's balance sheet. Most of those who lost their homes are hard-working, middle-class Americans who had lost their jobs. Now many have to use credit cards to pay for essentials and make ends meet, and they are running out of credit. Another $5 trillion has been lost from pensions and savings.

But it is jobs that have long represented the stairway to upward mobility in America. For a long time, it was feared they were vulnerable to offshore competition (and indeed still are), but now the erosion is from economic decline at home. What happens as those domestic opportunities recede? Middle-class families fear they have become downwardly mobile and have not hit the bottom yet. The financial security that was once based on home equity and a pension has been swept away.

In a survey just released, the Pew Research Center explored the recession's impact on households and how they are changing their spending and saving behavior. Nearly half the adults polled intend to boost their savings, cut their discretionary budgets, and cut their debt loads. The report concludes that the present enforced frugality will outlast the recession and its overhang. Fully 60 percent of those ages 50 to 61 say they may delay retirement. What does that mean for the young would-be employees entering the labor force over the next few years.

The administration's stimulus program, because of the way Congress put it together, has created far fewer jobs than anyone expected given the huge price tag of almost $800 billion. It was supposed to constrain unemployment at 8 percent, but the recession took the rate way above that and in the process humbled the Obama presidency. Some 25 million jobless or underemployed people now wish to work full time, but few companies are ready to hire. No speech is going to change that.

Little wonder there has been a gradual public disillusionment. Little wonder people have come alive to the issue of excess spending with entitlements out of control as far as the eye can see. The hope was that Obama would focus on the economy and jobs. That was the number one issue for the public—not healthcare. Yet the president spent almost a year on a healthcare bill. Eighty-five percent in one poll thought the great healthcare
crisis was about cost. It was and is, but the president's bill was about extending coverage. It did nothing about the first concern and focused mostly on the second. Even worse, to win its approval he accepted the kind of scratch-my-back deal-making that suggests corruption in the political process. And as a result, Obama's promise to change "politics as usual" disappeared.

The president failed to communicate the value of what he wants to communicate. To a significant number of Americans, what came across was a new president trying to do too much in a hurry and, at the same time, radically change the equation of American life in favor of too much government. This feeling is intensified by Obama's emotional distance from the public. He conveys a coolness and detachment that limits the number of people who feel connected to him.

Americans today strongly support a pro-growth economic agenda that includes fiscal discipline, limited government, and deficit reduction. They fear the country is coming apart, while the novelty of Obama has worn off, along with the power of his position as the non-Bush. His decline in popularity has emboldened the opposition to try to block him at every turn.

Historically, presidents with approval ratings below 50 percent—Obama is at 45—lose an average of 41 House seats in midterm elections. This year, that would return the House of Representatives to Republican control. The Democrats will suffer disproportionately from a climate in which so many Americans are either dissatisfied or angry with the government, for Democrats are in the large majority in both houses and have to defend many more districts than Republicans. In any election year, voters' feelings typically settle in by June. But now they are being further hardened by the loose regulation that preceded the poisonous oil spill—and the tardy government response.

The promise of economic health that might salvage industries and jobs, and provide a safety net, has proved illusory. The support for cutting spending and cutting the deficit reflects in part the fact that the American public feels the Obama-Congress spending program has not worked. As for the healthcare reform bill, the most recent Rasmussen survey indicates that 52 percent of the electorate supports repeal of the measure—42 percent of them strongly.

It is clear that the magical moment of Obama's campaign conveyed a spell that is now broken in the context of the growing public disillusionment. Obama's rise has been spectacular, but so too has been his fall.
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3246  Forums / Main Forum / Re: straight-talk on: July 12, 2010, 04:12:51 AM
I dont know... they did not have the constitution back then... so they must have died without the due process of law..hehe.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3247  Forums / Main Forum / Re: The sabbath on: July 11, 2010, 08:31:08 AM
There is always a new morning. There is a hope unto hope. There is a message of life mixed with a distance from God. We are not programed robots who follow a few steps. But we draw from the life of another Person. So we go through highs and lows as to Gods design to encourage us as we are made holistically. This is why drawing near to God is absolutely vital to our physical and spiritual vitality. God has created us to be encouraged by feeding us a little at a time.

While we are on this earth we begin our eternal life. We go to our spiritual heaven in order to have a better position in our perfected state. Our psychological and spiritual programing of these mysteries are built in us by the structure of Gods leading us in these unseen paradigms. We are always reminded on a weekly basis that we are going to another glory of saints made perfect. This is the distinct nature of how we are separated unto God. 
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3248  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Could Jesus have sinned? on: July 11, 2010, 08:00:26 AM
Jesus could not have sinned because value is placed upon the ability to do the most worthy act as well as the ability to reject the power to oppose it. Then you create a contradiction about the worth of the difference between what is human and what is divine. This is why God cannot be mocked... or He cannot be lowered to a human standard in order to argue for the proof of His identity as lesser or equal human of the human race. He was a better human being that any one in the human race. He had the capacities to take on more suffering ... more strength of persuasion by the depth of his reception of His personal human experiences than any of the human race. He taught like no other man. In this he is more worthy to prove His identity with the greatest sinner who endure much less opposition. He had a perfect rejection of all that was designed by man to destroy his culture and the people who were part of that culture. Jesus is the only man who is worthy of being worshiped as a man.
Its the difference between Jesus being represented as an argument for a particular position of truth...or as an identity of humanities potential.. and becoming a man ... the only real man. In our having ideas about Jesus we must distinguish this value in terms His distinct place as the "Only real Man"
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3249  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Could Jesus have sinned? on: July 08, 2010, 12:42:12 PM
Quote
The Jews considered the NT Greek language to be adequate to connect the OT language to the NT... this is just like the pot calling the kettle black. 
 

Beside the fact that I don't even know what you're referring to (your comment makes no sense);  how do you know what the Jews thought was adequate? Based on what information...historical documents?, some ancient recordings? Or is that just your opinion base on...what?

The Jews used Greek to communicate with the Hellenistic community but used the Hebrew scrolls in synagogue (Jesus read  from the Isiah scroll).  They also used oral Aramaic paraphrased scripture later called the Targums when committed to the written form.

The Vikings came much later and further away from Judea...around 700-900 AD.  The word “Hell” comes from them (it's not a Greek or Hebrew word). The English used the word when they translated the Bible and it's been there ever since. The Word Hell, is misleading.

Thor Smiley

Thor knows who Hel is!


Thor as i recall these NT letters to the Jewish churches were written in Greek with a little Aramaic. To a predominantly Jewish early church. dont play dumb. Language is culture. 
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3250  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Hidden In God on: July 08, 2010, 11:13:38 AM
What i didn't make clear is that real serenity, not just the new age imitation, doesn't come from us.

Remember the "serenity prayer"?  It starts with "God grant me the serenity..."  It is His growing gift to us when we trust in Him.  Apart from Christ's empowerment, "serenity" a Hallmark-greeting-card-style, artificial peace of mind which is superficial and temporary.  And sometimes He grants it to those who are just beginning to come to know Him -- then He is humble and gracious enough to give it anonymously.

mbG:  "This is why God must teach us directly as an influence not only upon the spiritual knowledge but how we live in that knowledge on a daily basis."

K_k:  He teaches us directly as an influence in our daily spirit-knowing-lived-out, yes.  It is His compassion for others, through us, that teaches us what compassion is.  His joy, through us, teaches us more about what true joy is.  His peace, in us, gives us new levels of rest for our souls. 

Everyone is a sinner. That means there is a tendency to be as bad as we possibly can.  All people suffer from this tendency. There are things that we can change but we do not have the ability to or the providential things available. Its not that we have a divided ability. The problem is that we have things about ourselves that we cannot change because we are in a constant state of the laws condemnation. There is no man who is above being condemned for not fulfilling his personal responsibilities to prove himself. We live a life in between guilt ... shame and love and acceptance. There is no in between state of personal redemption.

We live before a holy God who grants us life out of mercy. That means that every breath we take is breathed in by a condemned man and it is expelled as irresponsibility. We enjoy peace... love... acceptance ... and qualification as a proof out of Gods forgiveness. So that our guilt meets His suffering and we have peace. No other foundation is available to us.

There is many voices that parade themselves before our ears. There are many words that we hear that present themselves as alternatives. But our fall back position is very simple. Salvation is in God alone! That means that we take the position that earning is from a sense of personal attainment from our doing something to receive a paradigm of spiritual understanding. But grace requires us to see the mystery as the attraction. That is where all of these personal sorrows meet His work and then we are renewed. It was done many yrs ago on the cross and now it is finished. This is not serenity... this is true power and victory.
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3251  Forums / Main Forum / Re: to party or not to party? on: July 08, 2010, 10:44:02 AM
If we are all honest...especially as Americans.. we all share in the heritage of having parties out of our freedom to choose just what we are going to enjoy on that day. We are all the most cultured people the world has ever produced. So have fun. Just be careful.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3252  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Hidden In God on: July 08, 2010, 10:32:09 AM
Quote from: mybigGod link=topic=12648.  msg226045#msg226045 date=1272985854
We are seeking to leave this world for a time.   The way to spiritual transformation is treating this world as a fickle friend.   Its seeing with spiritual eyes.   We live a life of faith.  .  .   the world wants us to live by sight.   Faith is something that we acquire by a gift.   We can not find it in any other connection on this earth.   It comes to us directly.   I mean faith as defining our better view of things.  
We are walking down this long hall way.   The world is at our backs.   We are fleeing this world because it is cursed.   We see the blessings of all of the good things in another world.   Every cursed spirit is trying to force us into a connection to this world that would hold us in its power.   We are free people.   The world is a world of bondage.   Thats why we groan inwardly.   Because the world swallows people up into its system with the Prince and power of the air and it draws people into powers that are seducing.   It makes a man focus on things that are in close connection to an impossible set of standards.   Because the world offers a wage for a payment.   You pay with your life and you get a measly wage.   In the world there is no such thing as eternity.   It is who gets the most toys wins.   These massive wages hold men under the power of their own lust! But  comparative to the wages of eternity they are miserly.

 So that we always want to get out of this world in order to be free to live in another world.   We long to see Jesus.   So we groan in a way that we would flee to our mountain and these mountains of reality are actual views we have of not being under the domination of men or things even tho they try to force us to feel a certain way in the transaction.   We are living a life of no condemnation.

That is why we belong to another world.   Because the men in this world look at us and they say.  .   you cannot possibly be realistic in your being poor in this world.   You are a dunce.   To which we say.  .  .   How can you shake your finger in the face of God? Now i tell you with all of my heart.  .  .   seek His face .  .  .   flee from the wrath to come! You have no power over my life.  .  .   it is hidden in God! When we see our Kings face then the light of the glory of God.  .  .   that which is more valuable than anything in this world.  .   it shines in our faces.   It makes our countenance unlike anything transparent in this world! This is why when we call on our great deliver from the world we receive better than we could ever ask or think.   The world offers wages that are burdens.  .  .   God gives us things that are beyond our pay scale! Is your life hidden in God? Do you feel like a foreigner in this world? Are you all alone in God?

Seems perfect to me

cheap e cigarettes online

Is this an agreement of my position or a "oh... you just are so heavenly minded you are no earthly good"  philosophy? I need more words. I wont bite. I admit i use to love those candy cigs...hehe
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3253  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Could Jesus have sinned? on: July 08, 2010, 10:25:46 AM
Quote
Speaking of Creeds. . . I am wondering how many of you agree with the Apostles Creed where it says Christ descended into Hell.   I had looked forever it seems to find out if that was scriptural or not. . . . but could only find "belly of the earth" in First or 2nd Peter but nothing solidly conclusive about this.   Any takers on that one??

First of all, thank you for the kind words.

Hmm...

From He Descended into Hell

But whatever interpretation one accepts, the scriptural passages upon which this teaching is based must be studied closely. Some of the standard texts are Job 38:17, Psalm 68:18-22; Matthew 12:38-41; Acts 2:22-32; Romans 10:7; Ephesians 4:7-10, 1 Peter 3:18-20, and 1 Peter 4:6.

So the net is that Jesus went down and proclaimed victory to the spirits imprisoned in Tartarus, then released the Old Testament saints from Sheol and ascended into Heaven with them in tow.  Okay, I can see how the creed-writers got that. 


Remember the word "Hell" is a borrowed word from the viking Saxons who conquered Britain and supplanted much of their language with their own.  Hell or Hel is the Viking goddess of their underworld.  Hell is actual not even a Biblical word...just a borrowed one with all its conflicting meanings added. That's why you have to understand the underlying Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic words.
Many Christian teachers are worthless in explaining a lot of these things and just perpetuate confusion in the pews.

Thor Smiley

The Jews considered the NT Greek language to be adequate to connect the OT language to the NT... this is just like the pot calling the kettle black. 
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3254  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Could Jesus have sinned? on: July 08, 2010, 08:15:01 AM
If you look at the OT concept of the earth in contrast to the heavens then you will see the NT teaching on this. The teaching of the earth was a place where there was pain and sorrow accompanied by death. The earth He has made for man.. but the heavens are Gods. This is that philosophy that was so ingrained in that culture.
This is why when you come to the NT then you see the stress of the Messiah... or the Word coming down out of the heavens. That is the revelation of Christ the Savior of Israel. But in order for there to be a greater contrast it must be defined as Him coming from glory into the lowest place of scorn and death.
Now if we think of it as a place in relation to our view then we would say that heavens are up there but the earth is down here. And we would say that hell is beneath us. But as you know that is no necessarily true. Places in relation to this concept could paint a wrong picture. It is best to think of it as He comes from glory into a place of death and destruction. So that its from Gods view.

Let me apply this.. there is a contrast here between ability and inability. And it speaks of these things being much worse than our perception. That is from our natural view. This is why we have so much problem with the biblical concepts in relation to the true nature of the spiritual realities. And this is our natural tendencies to view the time sequence in lite of our fallen misunderstanding of how our circumstances ... past and present and future apply to us. This is why God warns us to not take the name of the Lord our God in vain....or its having a distastes for the means that we have been given. Because wicked men downplay the importance of the transforming powers of Gods revelation.

 But these things create our natural misunderstanding about the state of our own hearts and the condition of the present world. Because the standard is always moving. The world is moving in the direction so that God will judge the world and we will enjoy a new world. But we always fail to see the weight of sorrow that has been increased. The reasons that these things are going in this direction and we place ourselves in a condition of hardness in which we measure what we say against a false standard of what is required.  Because the present foundations of these matters create a kind of allusion to what we believe the world is like.
We must see that there is more to our present experience than we understand. God works beyond our principles in a more detailed way. God sees the things that man cannot comprehend and He weighs things according to their correct weight.    
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
3255  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Could Jesus have sinned? on: July 07, 2010, 05:45:32 PM
    Chalcedonian Creed

We, then, following the holy Fathers, all with one consent, teach people to confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, the same perfect in Godhead and also perfect in manhood;
    truly God and truly man, of a reasonable [rational] soul and body;
    consubstantial [co-essential] with the Father according to the Godhead, and consubstantial with us according to the Manhood;
    in all things like unto us, without sin;
    begotten before all ages of the Father according to the Godhead, and in these latter days, for us and for our salvation, born of the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God, according to the Manhood;
    one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, only begotten, to be acknowledged in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeably, indivisibly, inseparably;
    the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved, and concurring in one Person and one Subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son, and only begotten, God the Word, the Lord Jesus Christ;
    as the prophets from the beginning [have declared] concerning Him, and the Lord Jesus Christ Himself has taught us, and the Creed of the holy Fathers has handed down to us.
Reply
Reply

No comments:

Post a Comment