4212
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Freedom Of The Will Jonathan Edwards
4215
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: Can A Strong Emotional Person
|
on: October 25, 2009, 08:18:32 PM
|
I had to redo?
Why I prefer openess for me-I have many skeleton's Probaly more thenare decorations on my street-
So
I stay open-- A It keeps me accountable-To Certain friends and
Wife--And Open help me remember I aint all that---I found its a pothole
to enjoy life to its fullest--Wether your ill in crazy constant pain--Or
well and life's well--When you live open-You attract likewise
persons-Its EZ'er to be a light and salt you never look the way of the
hypocrate--You learn who you are--Not who you pretend to be--
To Sum It Up-You are free-Free to be a better friend -spouse-child-Grand Spouse-And Child of the Most High Thanks for the great 100% answers from the heart-
How Awesome are all of you--100000% Awesome-Thanks
((((((((Pete))))))
Bro... this is one of the best threads we have had in a while.... i
think most of us walk around in a christian straight jacket because we
get tooo religious. I dont think that we can grow unless we are loved
and we cant feel loved unless we can express that pain in some kind of
emotion that comes up from our souls. Thats why we are encouraged to
find the natural emotion as that expression in terms of shedding tears.
God encourages us to weep because He says that He stores our tears in
heaven. A metaphor about casting our burdens... not just the physical
problem... but the emotional reality of our hearts... there is no sense
in hiding that from Him..He knows our most blind troubles and i think
that is the main reason that we are encouraged to pray when we are in
trouble. The more we learn to pour our hearts out to Him... learning to
be as honest as we can to Him ... then the more we are going to hit that
sore spot in our souls. This I think is why He tells us that He
stores our tears... because i think the Holy Spirit actually gives us
the balance of which i think that we tend to be overly focused on the
purely doctrinal accuracy and we do not naturally think about the inner
healing of the Holy Spirits witness that we have access to as a
physiological relief. But since we tend to hold onto these hurts as a
matter of not knowing how to get relief from the inward experience then
we teach ourselves to hold onto the pain. But Christ says that His
burden is lite and His yoke is easy. Its not something that we tell
ourselves... its something that He promises to relieve us in our union
with Him... He fellowships with us by taking our emotion and
physiological burdens. Now then even tho we may not find that
the situation changes we can still be encouraged by feeling like we have
gone to Him and wept before Him so that we feel lite. This is casting
our burdens on Him. If we believe in grace then we believe that He wants
to give us free peace... so that we do not need to earn it by our
obedience... but we have it promised to us in His conquering the fear of
death.. or that process that burdens us beyond our ability to cope... i
am speaking here of the emotional and physiological effects of the
gospel. One of the t hings that i have found in memorizing the
Psalms is this medicinal spiritual massaging aspect of the promise of
the Holy Spirit. I find that if i am crying out to Him then at some
point i am encouraged to feel the pressure as His peace becomes more
real in the praying. I mean that there is a sense of lightheartedness
and then thats when the evil pain or pressure is revealed to me.. .then i
may be brought to tears as if i had the feeling of a dependent child.
And in a sense we are encouraged to not have the worry as if we were a
child ... you know that innocence of being able to focus in a purely
uncomplicated innocent world. We have so much to uncover but it is going
to give us more potential to blossom as we were ment to be.
4223
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: All men cleansed from sin on the Cross ...
|
on: October 20, 2009, 06:23:35 PM
|
I
still agree that in Adam all died because we were all in his loins;
however, once again, there was no covenant made with Adam, and there was no cleansing done on the cross. Those two points are FABRICATED! There’s no covenant with Adam because God never made a covenant with Adam! PERIOD! And, there was no cleansing done on the cross (birth by water)
The scriptures say otherwise. A cleansing indeed happened on the Cross through the blood of Christ.Rom 5:8-10 8 But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. 9 Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God's wrath through him! 10 For if, when we were God's enemies, we were reconciled to him through the death of his Son, how much more, having been reconciled, shall we be saved through his life! (NIV)Acts 10:15 15 The voice spoke to him a second time, "Do not call anything impure that God has made clean." (NIV)
Acts 10:28 28 He said to them: "You are well aware that it is against our law for a Jew to associate with a Gentile or visit him. But God has shown me that I should not call any man impure or unclean. (NIV)b2
B2
can you show me a translator and grammar commentary who actually
translates this "impure and unclean" outside the context of the
ceremonial law as distinguishing the Nations from Israel?
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
4224
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: All men cleansed from sin on the Cross ...
|
on: October 20, 2009, 05:22:20 PM
|
B2
5.
It necessitated the coming of the Son of God to step in on man‘s
behalf and bring to a close this first critical and far-reaching
interaction between God and man.
Romans 3:9 [ No One is
Righteous ] What shall we conclude then? Are we any better ? Not at
all! We have already made the charge that Jews and Gentiles alike are all under sin. B2
If i am not mistaken this verb "are under" is a present tense verb and
it is after the cross in terms of the time line of history. Galatians 4:8 Formerly, when you did not know God, you were slaves to those who by nature are not gods. Here
is the apostle speaking to the Galatian believers and he is describing
their pre salvation position as being enslaved to the sin nature or
their own lust. He speaks of this post cross experience as going from
the slavery to sin in the past but post cross to a new position of being
in Christ.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
4225
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: All men cleansed from sin on the Cross ...
|
on: October 20, 2009, 05:01:37 PM
|
Roy:
Only
half of the transaction was done at the cross—“For He (God the Father)
hath made Him (Yeshua` the Messiah) to be sin for us, who knew no sin….”
Hebrews 10:14 12But
when this priest had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he
sat down at the right hand of God. 13Since that time he waits for his
enemies to be made his footstool, 14because by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy. Hebrews 9:12 He did not enter by means of the blood of goats and calves; but he entered the Most Holy Place once for all by his own blood, having obtained eternal redemption.Roy
if you check the tense of those verbs you will find that they speak of a
completed act that was accomplished at the cross. Unless of course
perfected and obtained do not run parallel with the cross in this
grammar construction but we insert mans believing. That would not
support a literal translation. In that case the cross is really a
metaphor for mans believing. Of course with God all events are present.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
4228
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Paul Washer/Steve Brown
|
on: October 16, 2009, 04:54:00 PM
|
They
may both be preaching the same gospel in the sense that they both
adhere to the essentials of the gospel, however, from what I have been
able to adduce, Paul Washer has a major bee in his bonnet when it comes
to the issue of "decisional salvation." He bases this on his own life
history when earlier in his life, he made a profession of faith,
believed he was saved, and yet remained fundamentally unchanged. He
appearently uses this as the model for anyone anytime, anywhere who,
after "coming to the Lord" are still struggling with sinful desires or a
desire to want to follow the Lord. Witness in one video (available on
YouTube) where he recounts how a girl came to him very distraught about
how she cried out to the Lord for salvation six times, and yet it did
not seem to take. His advice? He told her that she had the choice of
either spending eternity in hell, or else continue crying out to the
Lord until she was finally saved. The story ends with him praying about
her and then she all-of-a-sudden plops down next to him all bubbly and
smiles and tells him she finally (after much crying out) had the Lord
tell her "Your mine!."
My take? She was saved all along and the
Lord finally had to show her in no uncertain terms that she was. Why do I
say this? Quite simple; how does someone, whom scripture says is
completely hostile to the word of God, is walking in the flesh, has
absolutely no affinity for the things of God and loves darkness cry out
to God one time for salvation let alone six?! Washer who
is so hostlie to "decisional salvation" is so bound-up by his own
personal experiences that he has completely lost touch with the reality
of scripture and what it says. The council he now gives is as far away
from the salvation message of grace as the most staunchest Arminian.
I
do not know if Washer was genuinely saved the first time he "came to
the Lord." I do know that both scripture and common sense tells me that
the natural man has absolutely no interest or love for the things of
God. If a person's salvation failed to take the first time, it is highly
unlikely that they would be back a second time (let alone six!) to
"give it another go." I do know that apart from the bare essentials, he
is just about at odds with everything Steve Brown says and teaches.
TB as always ... a pleasure to read... bulls eye buddy.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
4229
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Paul Washer/Steve Brown
|
on: October 16, 2009, 03:44:42 PM
|
I
have John MacArthur's series on breaking sin's grip, he states the only
way to be truly free of sin is to die, yet we can and must be liberated
from it's tyranny here and now, I concur.
We already died
to sin... but its not good either to have the spirit that is ... if it
was for Gods glory then i would gladly go to hell... it could be an over
focus on one thing is what that is....God is holistic... so God has
given us grace to deal slowly with some of the more difficult sins.. and
he has given us medicine and community. There is no self dieing out of
balance i dont think . God is responsible to change us... more than we
are. Calvinism gives you a balance view of all that God has given us and
where to draw the line.... its called taking the principles from ot
law... but Cal doctrine doesnt cure all the problems.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
4230
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Paul Washer/Steve Brown
|
on: October 16, 2009, 03:19:16 PM
|
I've
tried everything, every program, course, counseling, livein/live out
program, hospitalazation....perhaps there's one program out there that
God has chosen that still eludes me!  I
really thought that once I joined the RCC I would have arrived, after
all it is the "true church" that Christ founded, surely God would love
and accept me now! In the past I just gave up and gave myself over to my
sin/addiction/slavery, you choose the terminology. I don't want to do
that this time, I have years of regret and heartache from those choices,
not to mention all the damage I've caused in the lives of those who
tried to get close to me....."Celebrate Recovery?" Can't be worse than
celebrating despair!
If you want my thinking about what i
have done is just Prayer the word and the sacraments ....as a
Calvinist.... but the meditation or the amount of meditation on the word
is what helps with the sin and pain... both the overcoming to a certain
extent and eventually instant relief of pain. One hour of meditation at
this time in my life and i am literally experiencing heaven in a
euphoric sense..
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment