Sunday, November 8, 2015

4351  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Depression and the Gospel on: September 05, 2009, 10:27:30 AM

I understand depression by experience. I do not mean to down play this terrible disease. Here is something interesting. http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=32809940591
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4352  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Romans and the Flesh Monster. on: September 04, 2009, 05:58:12 PM
I love turning on the bible tape to the story of david and listening to it more than the other portions of the OT. I have come to a place where i have seen this mystery about how we view these ot characters. Most people think that David was this great man of faith prior to his great fall with the sin of adultery and murder. But after much time hearing this story... David was not naturally strong. Even before his sin and while he was fleeing from Saul he was doing a lot of running. I think David had this problem of hiding things in his life that were very important. The sin just rose to a new level in his retreating back to being comfortable while there were enemies to fight. You see the truth is that most of the ot characters where these paper tigers.
Now God has said that David was a man after His own heart. I really believe that all the accomplishments that David achieved was done by a man that was at times so disoriented by his struggle that God was covering for him.
If you look at the end of this great mans life you will find that he was not securing the position for his son Solomon. He basically was told that there was an insurrection and he needed to act. This is what is so hard to understand about this great warrior. I mean that he is in his old age and i really think that he had come to being so weak that he was not able to rule. It was like he had always been but magnified ten times. And yet God said that David was a man after His own heart. Wow. 
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
= on: September 04, 2009, 12:27:05 PM

Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4354  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Romans 11 Commentary ... J . Calvin on: September 04, 2009, 12:02:57 PM
26. And so all Israel, etc. Many understand this of the Jewish people, as though Paul had said, that religion would again be restored among them as before: but I extend the word Israel to all the people of God, according to this meaning, — “When the Gentiles shall come in, the Jews also shall return from their defection to the obedience of faith; and thus shall be completed the salvation of the whole Israel of God, which must be gathered from both; and yet in such a way that the Jews shall obtain the first place, being as it were the first-born in God’s family.” This interpretation seems to me the most suitable, because Paul intended here to set forth the completion of the kingdom of Christ, which is by no means to be confined to the Jews, but is to include the whole world. The same manner of speaking we find in Galatians 6:16. The Israel of God is what he calls the Church, gathered alike from Jews and Gentiles; and he sets the people, thus collected from their dispersion, in opposition to the carnal children of Abraham, who had departed from his faith.
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4355  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Romans and the Flesh Monster. on: September 04, 2009, 10:35:14 AM
And the glory of God is spoken of as that wherein consists the value and end of particular graces. As of faith. Rom. iv. 20. “He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief: but was strong in faith, giving glory to God.” Phil ii. 11. “That every tongue should confess that Jesus is the Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” Of repentance, Josh. vi. 19. “Give, I pray thee, glory to the Lord God of Israel, and make confession unto him.” Of charity. 2 Cor. viii. 19. “With this grace, which is administered by us, to the glory of the same Lord, and declaration of your ready mind.” Thanksgiving and praise. Luke vii. 18. “There are not found that returned to give glory to God, save this stranger.” Psal. l. 23. “Whoso offereth praise glorifieth me; and to him that ordereth his conversation aright, will I show the salvation of God.” Concerning which last place may be observed, that God seems to say this to such as supposed, in their religious performances, that the end of all religion was to glorify God. They supposed they did this in the best manner, in offering a multitude of sacrifices; but God corrects their mistake, and informs them, that this grand end of religion is not attained this way, but in offering the more spiritual sacrifices of praise and a holy conversation. J Edwards This is biblical speak or encouragement in the Spirit.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4356  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: The end for which God created the World: Edwards on: September 04, 2009, 10:27:06 AM
That the ultimate end of moral goodness, or righteousness, is answered in God’s glory being attained, is supposed in the objection which the apostle makes, or supposes some will make, Rom. iii. 7. “For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory, why am I judged as a sinner?” i. e. seeing the great end of righteousness 109 is answered by my sin, in God being glorified, why is my sin condemned and punished? and why is not my vice equivalent to virtue?

And the glory of God is spoken of as that wherein consists the value and end of particular graces. As of faith. Rom. iv. 20. “He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief: but was strong in faith, giving glory to God.” Phil ii. 11. “That every tongue should confess that Jesus is the Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” Of repentance, Josh. vi. 19. “Give, I pray thee, glory to the Lord God of Israel, and make confession unto him.” Of charity. 2 Cor. viii. 19. “With this grace, which is administered by us, to the glory of the same Lord, and declaration of your ready mind.” Thanksgiving and praise. Luke vii. 18. “There are not found that returned to give glory to God, save this stranger.” Psal. l. 23. “Whoso offereth praise glorifieth me; and to him that ordereth his conversation aright, will I show the salvation of God.” Concerning which last place may be observed, that God seems to say this to such as supposed, in their religious performances, that the end of all religion was to glorify God. They supposed they did this in the best manner, in offering a multitude of sacrifices; but God corrects their mistake, and informs them, that this grand end of religion is not attained this way, but in offering the more spiritual sacrifices of praise and a holy conversation.
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4357  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Freedom Of The Will Jonathan Edwards on: September 04, 2009, 10:20:44 AM
5. It appears from what has been said, that these terms necessary, impossible, &c. are often used by philosophers and metaphysicians in a sense quite diverse from their common and original signification; for they apply them to many cases in which no opposition is supposable. Thus they use them with respect to God’s existence before the creation of the world, when there was no other being; with regard to many of the dispositions and acts of the divine Being, such as his loving himself, his loving righteousness, hating sin, &c. So they apply them to many cases of the inclinations and actions of created intelligent beings wherein all opposition of the Will is excluded in the very supposition of the case.

Metaphysical or philosophical Necessity is nothing different from their certainty. I speak not now of the certainty of knowledge, but the certainty that is in things themselves, which is the foundation of the certainty of the knowledge, or that wherein lies the ground of the infallibility of the proposition which affirms them.

What is sometimes given as the definition of philosophical Necessity, namely, “That by which a thing cannot but be,” or “where by it cannot be otherwise,” fails of being a proper explanation of it, on two accounts: First, the words can, or cannot, need explanation as much as the word Necessity; and the former may as well be explained by the latter, as the latter by the former. Thus, if any one asked us what we mean, when we say, a thing cannot but be, we might explain ourselves by saying, it must necessarily be so; as well as explain Necessity, by saying, it is that by which a thing cannot but be. And Secondly, this definition is liable to the fore-mentioned great inconvenience; the words cannot, or unable, are properly relative, and have relation to power exerted, or that may be exerted, in order to the thing spoken of; to which as I have now observed, the word Necessity, as used by philosophers, has no reference.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4358  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: St. Augustine on: September 04, 2009, 10:16:45 AM
And yet, I sinned herein, O Lord God, the Creator and Disposer of all things in nature, of sin the Disposer only, O Lord my God, I sinned in transgressing the commands of my parents and those of my masters. For what they, with whatever motive, would have me learn, I might afterwards have put to good use. For I disobeyed, not from a better choice, but from love of play, loving the pride of victory in my contests, and to have my ears tickled with lying fables, that they might itch the more; the same curiosity flashing from my eyes more and more, for the shows and games of my elders. Yet those who give these shows are in such esteem, that almost all wish the same for their children, and yet are very willing that they should be beaten, if those very games detain them from the studies, whereby they would have them attain to be the givers of them. Look with pity, Lord, on these things, and deliver us who call upon Thee now; deliver those too who call not on Thee yet, that they may call on Thee, and Thou mayest deliver them.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4359  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Reformed Doctrine on: September 04, 2009, 09:25:53 AM
Gods sovereign rule over

    * The operations of all creation



Gen 8:22  While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.



Psa 104:5-10 Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever. Thou coveredst it with the deep as with a garment: the waters stood above the mountains. At thy rebuke they fled; at the voice of thy thunder they hasted away. They go up by the mountains; they go down by the valleys unto the place which thou hast founded for them. Thou hast set a bound that they may not pass over; that they turn not again to cover the earth. He sendeth the springs into the valleys, which run among the hills.



Psa 104:13-14 He watereth the hills from his chambers: the earth is satisfied with the fruit of thy works. He causeth the grass to grow for the cattle, and herb for the service of man: that he may bring forth food out of the earth;



Psa 104:19-20  He appointed the moon for seasons: the sun knoweth his going down. Thou makest darkness, and it is night: wherein all the beasts of the forest do creep forth.



Mar 4:39  And he arose, and rebuked the wind, and said unto the sea, Peace, be still. And the wind ceased, and there was a great calm.

 
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4360  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Reformed Doctrine on: September 04, 2009, 09:21:26 AM
MBG,


I don't know if anyones noticed but there a lot of quotes from men and very very skimpy on any good in-context supported scripture.

I like to see doctrine built on clear unambiguous Scripture and more than one supporting verse. Preferably something spoken by the Master. And it would help also with support in very early Church writings 2 nd century (not 3-4th century or 15-16 th century).

Thor Smiley

Thor, it shows me that you havent taken the time to read the whole thread. Thats ok cause proof text ing... if you know anything about the science of interpretation... is a method used to subvert the meaning of scripture by arguing over words. Its kind of like presenting the scriptures with a second hidden message or playing the numbers game.The Vegas method of interpretation- a very weak view of God.   Smiley 
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4361  Forums / Politics Forum / Re: Grade Obama so far on: September 03, 2009, 05:28:54 PM

ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4362  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Why should I be sorry for my sin? What does it do to God? on: September 03, 2009, 02:17:52 PM
Beacon and Murray... and especially B. If God makes us perfect , then you are saying that when we sin we are subject to the curse of the law as being treated according to our sins.  ("Primarily, because we love God and do not want to abuse His Grace, but also because our bad choices bring undesirable consequences for us and those we love,  not to mention sometimes other people as well. ")   And you said that this is the reason that we do not want to sin. This is something that i want to encourage you with in thinking the rite way. If God is gracious to make us clean of all of our sins then He is gracious to not treat us according to our sins.

MBG,

If I am understanding you correctly, are you saying that when we suffer the temporal consequences of our bad choices here on earth, that means that this places us "under the curse of the law" ?? 

b2


We do not have the ability to determine how we are going to approach God. We did not come to Him, He came to us. He came to us through regeneration. The reason that we were brought into this new life did not originate with our will. We were dead in our sins and trespasses. We were like the dead man Lazarus. Christ had to call us out of the state of death, He called us from the grave like a dead man. This is why we have no reason to measure our goodness by the law because He saved us from the condemnation of the law so that we live in His grace.

I am not a two line guy. I believe we must be very specific when we talk about this paradigm of doctrinal preciseness. So that we no longer live as if we were responsible to a set of principles or laws. We now have been brought back into the relationship that Adam had before the fall. But we are accepted by our relationship to one man. Jesus Christ. When we think in terms of being made perfect we must consider that there was only one perfect man. This is why it is not really true that we are intrinsically perfect. That would be a terrible presumption on our part, and we would be lowering the name,power , and authority of Christ. Christ obeyed the law perfectly not only in a passive sense, loving the Father in the most honorable way, but He acted in complete obedience to the Fathers will , whos standard of law keeping would dwarf our level of pride if He were to show Himself in the real comparison with our goodness. Christ teaches us by the honor of His name, and His requirements are for us to learn according to His rules.

This is why we are to learn to think like He would have us to think and not what we have been taught in a natural way. The more we think like Him the more we are going to hear Him speak and the more light will be shed upon our path. Our primary learning paradigm is by learning to think like Him and learning to hear His voice. The two line theologians place a premium on the prophetic preached word, as if it made demands on us in a general way. Some people say that if God is revealing Himself in the doctrinal teaching in an individual way then this will lead to disorder. Or its not an orthodox method of confessional propagation.But everyone is at different level of understanding. It would seem to me that this individualism would encourage a greater focus on doctrinal preciseness rather than discourage it. The doctrinal motive is that by which our own motives are enlightened and then we grow in our individual understanding.

Now why havent i been talking about payment for transgressions or learning from our mistakes?  Because this is not how we learn to obey!! We learn to obey when we focus on Christ and in viewing His worthiness we become like Him!! If we are looking at the law we have been graced programed to reverse our natural tendencies. We see how unworthy we are for the purpose of exalting His goodness.  Set your thoughts on Jesus, He is the faithful Son over Gods house. So yes we do not receive a just punishment for our offenses. I am saying this in defense of His perfect life living through me. This would seem to me to define true dependence. The encouragement to come to Him is because He does not bring a charge against me.

You guys will say... man... dude... you are trampling on the law. Look... if this balance you seem to trust in is animating you to obey then i wouldnt be so zealous to tell you how deceived you are. My friends He has not saved us to be good, He has saved us to be infused with His life more and more. This is a living relationship not a dead orthodoxy!!!       
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4363  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Reformed Doctrine on: September 02, 2009, 07:46:35 PM
The Belgic Confession
The Doctrine of Original Sin (Article 15)

We believe that by the disobedience of Adam original sin has been spread through the whole human race.

It is a corruption of all nature - an inherited depravity which even infects small infants in their mother's womb, and the root which produces in man every sort of sin. It is therefore so vile and enormous in God's sight that it is enough to condemn the human race, and it is not abolished or wholly uprooted even by baptism, seeing that sin constantly boils forth as though from a contaminated spring.

Nevertheless, it is not imputed to God's children for their condemnation but is forgiven by his grace and mercy - not to put them to sleep but so that the awareness of this corruption might often make believers groan as they long to be set free from the "body of this death."

1689 Baptist Confession
Of the Fall of Man, Of Sin, And of the Punishment Thereof (Chapter 6)

1. Although God created man upright and perfect, and gave him a righteous law, which had been unto life had he kept it, and threatened death upon the breach thereof, yet he did not long abide in this honour; Satan using the subtlety of the serpent to subdue Eve, then by her seducing Adam, who, without any compulsion, did willfully transgress the law of their creation, and the command given unto them, in eating the forbidden fruit, which God was pleased, according to his wise and holy counsel to permit, having purposed to order it to his own glory.

2. Our first parents, by this sin, fell from their original righteousness and communion with God, and we in them whereby death came upon all: all becoming dead in sin, and wholly defiled in all the faculties and parts of soul and body.

3. They being the root, and by God's appointment, standing in the room and stead of all mankind, the guilt of the sin was imputed, and corrupted nature conveyed, to all their posterity descending from them by ordinary generation, being now conceived in sin, and by nature children of wrath, the servants of sin, the subjects of death, and all other miseries, spiritual, temporal, and eternal, unless the Lord Jesus set them free.

4. From this original corruption, whereby we are utterly indisposed, disabled, and made opposite to all good, and wholly inclined to all evil, do proceed all actual transgressions.

5. The corruption of nature, during this life, doth remain in those that are regenerated; and although it be through Christ pardoned and mortified, yet both itself, and the first motions thereof, are truly and properly sin.
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4364  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: The end for which God created the World: Edwards on: September 02, 2009, 09:36:38 AM
And, from time to time, embracing and practising true religion, and repenting of sin, and turning to holiness, is expressed by glorifying God, as though that were the sum and end of the whole matter. Rev. xi. 13. “And in the earthquake were slain of men seven thousand; and the remnant were affrighted, and gave glory to the God of heaven.” So Rev. xiv. 6, 7. “And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach to them that dwell on the earth; saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him.” As though this were the sum and end of that virtue and religion, which was the grand design of preaching the gospel, every where through the world. Rev. xvi. 9. “And repented not to give him glory.” Which is as much as to say, they did not forsake their sins and turn to true religion, that God might receive that which is the great end he seeks, in the religion he requires of men. (See to the same purpose, Psal. xxii. 21-23. Isa. lxvi. 19.and Isa. xxiv. 15.and Isa. xxv. 3. Jer. xiii. 15, 16. Dan. v. 23. Rom. xv. 5, 6.)

And as the exercise of true religion and virtue in Christians is summarily expressed by their glorifying God, so, when the good influence of this on others is spoken of, it is expressed in the same manner. Matt. v. 16. “Let your light so shine before men, that others seeing your good works, may glorify your Father which is in heaven.” 1 Pet. ii. 12. “Having your conversation honest among the Gentiles, that whereas they speak evil against you as evildoers, they may, by your good works which they behold, glorify God in the day of visitation.”
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4365  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: St. Augustine on: September 02, 2009, 09:16:50 AM
O God my God, what miseries and mockeries did I now experience, when obedience to my teachers was proposed to me, as proper in a boy, in order that in this world I might prosper, and excel in tongue-science, which should serve to the “praise of men,” and to deceitful riches. Next I was put to school to get learning, in which I (poor wretch) knew not what use there was; and yet, if idle in learning, I was beaten. For this was judged right by our forefathers; and many, passing the same course before us, framed for us weary paths, through which we were fain to pass; multiplying toil and grief upon the sons of Adam. But, Lord, we found that men called upon Thee, and we learnt from them to think of Thee (according to our powers) as of some great One, who, though hidden from our senses, couldest hear and help us. For so I began, as a boy, to pray to Thee, my aid and refuge; and broke the fetters of my tongue to call on Thee, praying Thee, though small, yet with no small earnestness, that I might not be beaten at school. And when Thou heardest me not (not thereby giving me over to folly), my elders, yea my very parents, who yet wished me no ill, mocked my stripes, my then great and grievous ill.

Is there, Lord, any of soul so great, and cleaving to Thee with so intense affection (for a sort of stupidity will in a way do it); but is there any one who, from cleaving devoutly to Thee, is endued with so great a spirit, that he can think as lightly of the racks and hooks and other torments (against which, throughout all lands, men call on Thee with extreme dread), mocking at those by whom they are feared most bitterly, as our parents mocked the torments which we suffered in boyhood from our masters? For we feared not our torments less; nor prayed we less to Thee to escape them. And yet we sinned, in writing or reading or studying less than was exacted of us. For we wanted not, O Lord, memory or capacity, whereof Thy will gave enough for our age; but our sole delight was play; and for this we were punished by those who yet themselves were doing the like. But elder folks’ idleness is called “business”; that of boys, being really the same, is punished by those elders; and none commiserates either boys or men. For will any of sound discretion approve of my being beaten as a boy, because, by playing a ball, I made less progress in studies which I was to learn, only that, as a man, I might play more unbeseemingly? and what else did he who beat me? who, if worsted in some trifling discussion with his fellow-tutor, was more embittered and jealous than I when beaten at ball by a play-fellow?
4370  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Romans and the Flesh Monster. on: September 01, 2009, 09:52:24 PM

This is worth another look.

§ 42. Some may be ready to object against the Christian religion, that there seem to be innumerable difficulties and inconsistencies attending it, but that a multitude of heads have been employed for many ages, till at length such solutions have been found out for many of them, as are in some measure plausible.

To this I answer, That as there has been a long time to answer objections, so there has been a long time to strengthen them. As there have been many ages to solve difficulties, so there have been as many to find out difficulties and inconsistencies. Besides, there has been all this time to make difficulties more plain, and bring out inconsistencies more to the light; and by thorough and exact consideration to make them more manifest and apparent. Time wonderfully brings truth to light, and wears off by degrees false colourings and disguises. The truth will always have most advantage by time. Appearing inconsistencies, being well founded, will grow plainer and plainer, and difficulties more and more evident. Time will discover more circumstances to strengthen and confirm them, and so pretences of solution will appear more and more evidently absurd and ridiculous, When parties contend by argument and inquiry, time greatly helps that party which has truth on its side, and weakens the contrary. It gradually wears away the sandy foundation, and rots away the building that is not made of substantial materials. The Christian religion has evermore, in all ages, had its enemies, and that among learned men. Yea, it is observable, that there have commonly been some of the most subtle of men to scan the christian scheme, and to discover the objections that lie against it, and have done it with a good will to overthrow it. Thus it was in Judea, in the infancy of the church. The scribes and Pharisees, and the wise men among the Jews, employed all their wisdom against it. Thus, in the first ages of the church, not many wise, not many mighty, not many noble were called. Christianity had the wisdom, learning, and subtlety of the world to oppose it. In latter ages, how many learned and subtle men have done their utmost against Christianity! So that the length of time for persons to strengthen their own side in this controversy, brought as an objection against Christianity, is much more an argument for it, than an objection against it. J. Edwards
Quote from: mybigGod link=topic=11837. msg217530#msg217530 date=1251847849
Beacon and Murray. . .  and especially B.  If God makes us perfect , then you are saying that when we sin we are subject to the curse of the law as being treated according to our sins.   ("Primarily, because we love God and do not want to abuse His Grace, but also because our bad choices bring undesirable consequences for us and those we love,  not to mention sometimes other people as well. ")   And you said that this is the reason that we do not want to sin.  This is something that i want to encourage you with in thinking the rite way.  If God is gracious to make us clean of all of our sins then He is gracious to not treat us according to our sins.  Grace goes both ways .  And this not treating us according to our sins is the reason that we come to Him with our sins.  God is perfect and we are not.  Looking at the way His grace works is the way we are taught to know Him.  We are not taught by any kind of ability that we have in not sinning or in doing good.  We are taught by His perfect power according to His holy will.  We say that this is the enabling of an unworthy offense repeater.  Our confidence is not in our own moral code or our looking to our own obedience.  We learn the lessons of God by being taught about His name through His enabling power to make us holy. 

God does not make men perfect and then treat them as if they go outside the house  when they sin.  I agree with you that our sin has been completely taken care of .  I agree that the punishment of our sins was place upon Christ and He bore our punishment.  But when we describe the kind of trust we are to have as a result of all of this is where Beacon and I are not on the same page.  

Actually, we are perfect.  Hebrews 10:14 says, "For by one sacrifice, He has perfected forever those who are being sanctified. " I love Hebrews 10.  It's talking about the Levitical sacrifices of the Old Covenant.  These sacrifices could, in absolutely no way, perfect the Jews.  Why? Because they went back every year to do it over and over and over again.  However, Jesus' death and resurrection was ONCE for ALL.  It talks in Romans 5 about our justification of life through Jesus.  Biblically, to justify means to make innocent.  How could God see us as innocent if we are still guilty of sin?

God's math is 1=all.  All were in Adam, and all became sinners, regardless of their actions.  So if all are not in Jesus in becoming righteous regardless of their actions, then you are saying the work Satan did in Adam in the Garden has more merit than the work God did in Jesus on the cross.

This revelation of who you are in Christ will change your life.  You are FREE.

Welcome Natalie... yes i just want to be as honest as i can about this. I think if we all as Christians presented to the world that we are perfect then that would not be fair.Cause in all honesty we share with them in doing the same things as they do. What makes us different is not intrinsically natural in us as a measuring stick to the world. What is difference is that we belong to someone who is not us. We have Jesus, and He is in heaven as our mediator and high priest who has secured for us eternal salvation. If we say that we are perfect then everyone else is going to look at us like what is that? But if we say that Jesus is perfect and we are accepted because He was accepted then we can present something that will not get us in trouble with them. 
mBG: I think you've taken what we're saying out of context a little. I guess you're refering to when Beacon said;

"Must add that the consequences of bad choices for a child of God are temporary, meaning they only affect us while we are on this earth.  They do not affect our eternal status which is sealed at the time we are born again of God's Spirit."

Thats a fact. Well, another fact and testimony to God's grace is that we are still blessed. I'm not sure you didn't just assume that Beacon was saying that we're still punished, but that sort of goes without saying. Yeah, we still suffer the consequences according to the law of the land, and the authority we're under.. but that doesn't make it a sin, nor do we face an angry God. God is love, therefore we will always receive an out pouring of love. Whether we choose to receive it or not is a completely different story.

Most people are deceived in that they pressume (because they don't know) God is automatically pissed at them.  That is the prime example of a religious mind set. We call 'em "Churched."

You'd be surprised how eager some people are to find out that God actually love them. You'd be even more suprised at how many Christians don't recieve that.

The body of Christ, for the most part, is brainwashed. And it's our responsibility to wake them up, because we have some VERY curious, and interesting days ahead. In my personal opinion, everyone needs to be walking in the super natrual, and operating in the spiritual gifts. That, though, is an entirely different and relevant conversation in itself.

Let me apologize also in advance if my post come off a little uncompassionate, or heated. I just have a fervant desire to get this word out there. I promise that I wouldn't want to have this conversation elsewhere. I've been on and off this forum for over a year now, and you all are AWESOME men and women of God. So thank you for being so welcoming! In short: I love you all!

Thanks Murray, as Steve says we are all beggars telling other beggars where to find the bread. I just hope that in my suffering i can get lower not to suffer like the apostle Paul but to pass on His suffering on our behalf. I just want to encourage others with as little of my own ideas as i can possibly present. I hope to pass His word on to you and others as being underneath.  
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4375  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Vivifying effects of the Word of God on: September 01, 2009, 08:01:04 PM
There is always two sides to a man. I think these are in contrast to one another. In a sense men can react two different ways in a minute of the day. Although the immaterial and the material are interwoven in any reaction , yet it may seem that these are not related as we view the outward appearance. We must not be afraid of high spiritual experiences because this is the way that we are taught to obey. We are moved by our religious affections. And even tho the kind of experience is not necessarily the measurement of a true spiritual affection, the absence of the sign of affection is placing one in a declining way.

This is why there is a joy in seeing the human side of this world. These high experiences are not lessening the human experience. But they are relieving the human side. We are thinking beings but acting as if the mind is more than it is is not real and therefore it is not human. On the other hand if we measure the majesty of God , the greatness of His power then to be human is to display an animated reaction to this. This is why there is this great mystery of the cross where love and hate meet, where faithfulness and unfaithfulness meet, where trust and anxiety meet. Side by side, in that remnant of sin theology. May i say that God who made all things by the word of His power has breathed upon us to make us as spiritual beings with humanity to understand the natural flow of His sovereign rule. God has given us His presence by His Spirit and His word . That word cuts through the inner man and gives the man relief from a false human existence.

We are the most real when we are consumed by His love. If we are to draw from the proper teaching of His sovereign rule the reality of dwelling in His absolute faithfulness and all consuming love then we are to look on a God who does what He wants as representing His unfeigned love communicated to us. We rise on the wings of dependence upon the bigness of God do do what He wants in the power of His Spirit in the illumination of His word. This consuming effect is the pure worship we offer as we look at Him in the knowledge of His word. Humanity and spirituality come together in this high view of God.
Remove messageRemove ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4376  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Why should I be sorry for my sin? What does it do to God? on: September 01, 2009, 07:30:49 PM
Beacon and Murray... and especially B. If God makes us perfect , then you are saying that when we sin we are subject to the curse of the law as being treated according to our sins.  ("Primarily, because we love God and do not want to abuse His Grace, but also because our bad choices bring undesirable consequences for us and those we love,  not to mention sometimes other people as well. ")   And you said that this is the reason that we do not want to sin. This is something that i want to encourage you with in thinking the rite way. If God is gracious to make us clean of all of our sins then He is gracious to not treat us according to our sins. Grace goes both ways . And this not treating us according to our sins is the reason that we come to Him with our sins. God is perfect and we are not. Looking at the way His grace works is the way we are taught to know Him. We are not taught by any kind of ability that we have in not sinning or in doing good. We are taught by His perfect power according to His holy will. We say that this is the enabling of an unworthy offense repeater. Our confidence is not in our own moral code or our looking to our own obedience. We learn the lessons of God by being taught about His name through His enabling power to make us holy.

God does not make men perfect and then treat them as if they go outside the house  when they sin. I agree with you that our sin has been completely taken care of . I agree that the punishment of our sins was place upon Christ and He bore our punishment. But when we describe the kind of trust we are to have as a result of all of this is where Beacon and I are not on the same page. 
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4377  Forums / Politics Forum / Re: Grade Obama so far on: August 31, 2009, 11:34:44 PM
Hummmm, infrastructure projects all over Illinois. 

I'll give him an B+, only because he's still gives a shit what Republicans say.

Bush acted like there were Republicans and everyone else were traitors. 

I wish Obama would just do what's right and not mess it up with ridiculous measures designed to make people happy that would claim that he was feeding them poop for dinner, when it was lobster.
I will half  to say its an awfully expensive lobster.  Grin
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
4378  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Why should I be sorry for my sin? What does it do to God? on: August 31, 2009, 10:07:14 PM
Chad i think the curse of sin has been taken care of tho. I mean, i understand what you are saying... if you put your hand on a hot stove its going to burn.... but i do not think that we can avoid sin in the sense that there is going to be some chaff that will be burned up. Its those sins that we failed to address in a perfect fashion. If you look at Davids life.. he had a personal response from God to the sin of adultery and murder. But then you come into the new testament and you find the apostle Paul who ravaged the church by stoning and sword. And yet after Paul had the vision on the road to Damascas... He said that he did not have the blood of other men on His hands. I think it was quadruple what David did.
Which brings me back to the doctrine of double predestination. I think the rules change when we play fast and loose with this doctrine. I have heard preachers say the message as if there could be enough growth that in a sense they go outside the bible to create a straw man. We know that those who receive the just rewards for sin are the reprobate and that these things were determined before the foundation of the world. When we argue that sin is the big enemy and there is a cavalier attitude about finding the redeeming value in the value of an apostle Paul who was the apostle of grace ... i must say that listening to some of these messages where they have created a straw man.... i find my comfort from the horses mouth.
Reply

No comments:

Post a Comment