The word of God is the thought of God that
determines reality. God says "I am". He exist as the reality as being
present in every space, in all of time, and in complete power to do
whatever He pleases. God is completely independent of any other power
that would cause Him to act apart from His thought of reality. Man is
completely dependent upon God for everything. Man breathes every breath
because God thinks it. One thought of God would erase the entire history
of mankind. Mans thoughts are never Gods thoughts. Mans thoughts are
continually opposed to being completely dependent upon God. Men desire
to think apart from God as soon as they are born. Every design of men
are proof of the reality that man is futile in his thinking. There is no
institution of men that has lasted from one generation to the next. The
only lasting design in this world is what God has thought in bringing
glory to Himself. God has always existed and He will continue to exist
through out all generations.
4466
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Was Christ "fully" human?
|
on: August 11, 2009, 06:26:12 PM
|
From
God's point of view in Scripture it seems that it's not what you say
that counts it's what you do because that shows the true center of your
heart...which hopefully is God.
I'll go with wording it that way. It's not what you say--but what you DO. The
DO part is: If you BELIEVE in the ONE HE SENT---JESUS, then you are
born of the Spirit. Once Jesus takes up residence in you via The Holy
Spirit, from there on what you DO shows your heart. Which is now born
of HIS Spirit---it's regenerated. Here is what happens once you are born of His Spirit--- (KJV) Philippians 2:13 For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure. (NKJV) 13 for it is God who works in you both to will and to do for His good pleasure. (NIV) 13for it is God who works in you to will and to act according to his good purpose. So you can keep on doing and proving to God you have His GIFT of 'Faith' if you want Thor, (why you have to prove a gift HE gave you is beyond me? I'm thinking if He GAVE IT to you---umm, He knows you have it! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3122/c3122d48992e308c0fccd8958fd70380ad84d295" alt="Huh?" ) So that's not for me to prove to Him. What
is for me---- is to live my life according to The Spirit that dwells in
me and let God work and will me to 'DO' or 'ACT' according to HIS good purpose. I'll say it again. I have nothing to prove to God, for God did all that 'work' on the cross. The Proof is in Jesus.
Jesus payment was enough. Now He only sees me as righteous in Christ
(paid in FULL)!!! To say anything less is to deny what Christ did on
the cross. To say we have to 'show something' to GOD other than belief
in the one He sent-- is saying His 'work' was not enough! Others may demand "proof" that He dwells in us, but God certainly does not. How
could He? He KNOWS where He dwells. He knows whose hearts He lives
in. He knows whose spirit's are born of His. I really do not get where
you think we have to show our faith to God. I'm flabber-gasted! God GAVE us that faith for crying out loud. He LIVES IN US! How could He need Himself to prove something to Himself? All
the good I do is something He's worked in me to 'act' and 'do' and it's
all for His good purpose and for His Glory! It's Christ IN ME
now--life by The Spirit. He knows what He needs me to do for
Him--how could I know that on my own? I can't know the mind of God. I
can only be led by His Spirit. I'm part of his body--so the body
acts in accordance with the Head. God isn't served with human hands as
if He needed anything. He's the God who made ALL in ALL and in whom all
things exist! He also knows my heart intimately because He
dwells there, I'm now born of HIS Spirit. Him in me, me in Him. We sup
together. So I don't have to prove to Him He exists in me. He CHANGED
my heart when I believed in Him--when He came to sup with me. I'm still trying to figure out what you are saying! Any
outward actions that show my 'faith' are action's He's prompted me or
willed or acted in me to do---which does show OTHERS My faith. Or
another way to put that is that what God works in me to do speaks of
JESUS to others -As though God were making His appeal through me to be
reconciled to Christ. (2 Corinthians 5) But God Himself--HE needs no proof of where HE dwells or that I have the gift of Faith that He Himself GAVE ME. Any
test's I undergo, I call them trials--- are for my good or discipline
to make me stronger in Him, not to see if His faith is there! It's to
make my faith GROW! Not PROVE IT. JESUS PROVES IT--JESUS GAVE IT!
Very
good G2... you have explained the concept of obeying the gospel as well
as i have seen. Yes.. its giving up the thought that you can save
yourself. When a man obeys the gospel he actually decides to rest in
Christ finish work.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
4467
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Was Christ "fully" human?
|
on: August 11, 2009, 03:30:10 PM
|
Quote from: Thor However,
the problem in the OT and NT was not that people didn't believe in YHWH
or even believe that Jesus was the Christ, it was that they did not
place their TRUST (faith in action) in God and Jesus. How does God tell
the difference between those who trust Him and those who give “lip service”? By their actions! Certainly faith comes first but the two go hand in hand.
Come
again? Your argument makes no sense. It sounds like you are saying
they were TRUE believers but failed to put their trust in Jesus. Put
their faith in action.
How do you get “putting faith
in Actions from what I said? I said your actions show your faith. I
didn't say a believer put there faith in actions...how is that even
done?
God tells lip service from His TRUE CHILDREN by knowing HEARTS and
knowing where HE dwells. I'm the TEMPLE of the Holy Spirit--of the
Living God!
So the question is how does God know our hearts? What a person thinks, or says can be completely different from what he actually does. Classic
example a soldier in combat. he says he will be brave and do heroic
things if called upon, but when the time comes...he runs! On the other side a soldier is scared and appears to be cowardly but when the moment of truth comes he rises to the occasion. You never know what truly is in the heart until a person acts. That's why God tested the hearts of the children of Israel with hardship in the wilderness. Exo
16:4 Then the LORD said to Moses, "Behold, I will rain bread from
heaven for you; and the people shall go out and gather a day's portion
every day, that I may prove them, whether they will walk in my law or
not. Deu 8:2 And thou shalt remember all the way which the LORD
thy God led thee these forty years in the wilderness, to humble thee,
and to prove thee, to know what was in thine heart, whether thou
wouldest keep his commandments, or no. Deu 8:3 And he humbled thee,
and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest
not, neither did thy fathers know; that he might make thee know that
man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out
of the mouth of the LORD doth man live. 2Ch 32:31 And so in the
matter of the envoys of the princes of Babylon, who had been sent to him
to inquire about the sign that had been done in the land, God left him
to himself, in order to try him and to know all that was in his heart. How many different pathways can a person take in any given situation? From
God's point of view in Scripture it seems that it's not what you say
that counts it's what you do because that shows the true center of your
heart...which hopefully is God. Thor data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55b5e/55b5e5b4ba057fda5428ee03bfd224bad50be250" alt="Smiley"
Why
did Israel sin and fall in the desert? Because they did not know the
ways of God!!! God was dealing with Israel as a nation. But just because
they promised with their lips that they would do all that the law had
said ...i mean .. their best efforts did not get them one inch closer to
the covenant of grace!!! There is a big difference between God testing
one of His own... that is one who has been circumsized in the heart and
one who was only in the flesh. When David prays for God to test Him ...
He is not praying that He will be proven good by his ability to keep the
law. Over and over David said that sacrifice and offerings God did not
desire but a heart of thankfulness!! Why would David make a deal with
God to be proven rite by his ability to offer rite sacrifices? Thats in
essence offering God filthy rags. No David was required to give God
all the glory and to enjoy God for who God is and not what David could
do for God or God do for David. Gods promises of His covenant
faithfulness are according to Him proving Himself that His name alone is
to be exalted!!! Gods power and goodness are determined upon His own
out of His mercy!! The only requirement is that we bring nothing
except our sin and failure. James says for us to draw near to God and He
will draw near to us. Its not do something and then God will draw near.
Its approach the throne of mercy. The proper spirit of approaching the
throne of mercy is that all humanity has been worthy of judgment because
there is no man who can stand before God as a sinner. The only way that
we can draw near to God is by His mercy for us. In this sense all of
the promises are yes and amen in that power and holy decree in order to
stand as sinners before a holy and righteous God. Now then we do not
shudder in fear, but we come before God through the mercy that was
earned for us by Christ. We come with a will that He has given us so
that we have a confidence that we will find more grace to help us in
coming with nothing accept that which grace makes something. This idea
of proper reverence for God is seeing that we could not do enough for
Him in order to make His name great. He must give us grace in order to
vindicate His name before men. Because He determined in eternity who He
would place His love on, then we are only carrying a seed that is
implanted by God alone. In this way salvation is of God alone. He is
gracious enough to use imperfect sinners to bring other sinners His
word. This is not a moral message this is the gospel of grace. Psalm 5 4 You are not a God who takes pleasure in evil; with you the wicked cannot dwell. 5 The arrogant cannot stand in your presence; you hate all who do wrong. 6 You destroy those who tell lies; bloodthirsty and deceitful men the LORD abhors. 7 But I, by your great mercy, will come into your house; in reverence will I bow down toward your holy temple. This is the confidence of a believer as in the spirit he is expressing above Psalm 130 3 If you, O LORD, kept a record of sins, O Lord, who could stand? Salvation
is the same in the OT and NT they were looking back to Gods eternal
decree as their identity and forward to the cross and we are looking
back at the finished work and eternal decree in identity and forward for
our final salvation in the next big event.... Hebrews 4 16Let us then
approach the throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive
mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need. Psalm 138:2 I
will bow down toward your holy temple and will praise your name for
your love and your faithfulness, for you have exalted above all things
your name and your word. It really is a pleasure to approach a
throne of complete acceptance. Wow... how wicked men are sooo assuming.
His love and His faithfulness is in the covenant of grace because He has
been always faithful to apply the means of His word and name to us that
are as important as physical food.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
4469
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Why should I be sorry for my sin? What does it do to God?
|
on: August 11, 2009, 11:13:11 AM
|
How about this Luv,
Instead
of thinking of God in this case lets think of your wife, the one you
surrendered your wild single life of unbridled lust for, not out of duty
or duress, but because you saw her for who she was and you not only
desired her to date but as your very own for the rest of your life for
she fills every desire of your heart.
Now let's say you see a
girl in a bikini and you lust after her, how does that sin affect your
wife? Even if nowhere does it state not to lust? Is it like an insult to
her somehow? it's not hurting her physically, or does it have something
to do with belittling her oath at the altar, after giving herself
totally and completely for your sake?
should a man's marriage to
his wife be a closer more intimate relationship than that of his
relationship to God? or visa versa the woman (setting aside the sexual)
If
you still have the urge to continue to have the "lustful" thoughts
without any regrets, then maybe you never really found the girl of your
dreams or for that matter God of your salvation.
I do not
think this is a fair question. I have never met two people that have
been able to display perfect commitment in dealing with their own flesh
in their thought life that would be worthy of finding reasons to not
fulfill that marriage vow. In a given situation men and women are
fickle. I dont mean in the sense where the person actually sets out to
give into temptation of thought but its impossible to demand this kind
of expectation and not be in the position where you sin in being in Gods
place as the judge. This is what is so dangerous in trying to force
someone to behave properly. I have heard that since Job made a covenant
with his eyes not to look on a woman to lust that it was painting a
picture as if Job was more than human in fulfilling his covenant. That
becomes a theology of thought control. This is not the biblical doctrine
of mortifying the flesh. The bible is not a book in which the
standards are going to be perfectly kept as a necessity to be in an
acceptable position to be in a healthy relationship. The bible
presupposes that we are going to break Gods law in thought and deed. It
is a very practical book. People do not always end up like they started
in the christian life. Two individuals get married with two very
different set of standards and they do things by the standard of human
weakness and susceptibility to sin that excuse their own weaknesses and
magnify the other parties weaknesses. The point being that we cannot
force someone to meet our personal expectations. Only God can change a
mans will.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
4470
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Does God speak with fork toung?
|
on: August 11, 2009, 10:41:48 AM
|
forked-tongue -"to speak with a forked
tongue", meaning to say one thing and mean another or, in more general
terms, to act in a duplicitous manner.. If you have been saved but you are struggling with sin, does Gods threats get you to turn from your sin? Oh and that is my way of doing slang on forum subject sign in.
4471
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Why should I be sorry for my sin? What does it do to God?
|
on: August 11, 2009, 10:36:07 AM
|
How about this Luv,
Instead
of thinking of God in this case lets think of your wife, the one you
surrendered your wild single life of unbridled lust for, not out of duty
or duress, but because you saw her for who she was and you not only
desired her to date but as your very own for the rest of your life for
she fills every desire of your heart.
Now let's say you see a
girl in a bikini and you lust after her, how does that sin affect your
wife? Even if nowhere does it state not to lust? Is it like an insult to
her somehow? it's not hurting her physically, or does it have something
to do with belittling her oath at the altar, after giving herself
totally and completely for your sake?
should a man's marriage to
his wife be a closer more intimate relationship than that of his
relationship to God? or visa versa the woman (setting aside the sexual)
If
you still have the urge to continue to have the "lustful" thoughts
without any regrets, then maybe you never really found the girl of your
dreams or for that matter God of your salvation.
Have you ever gone to the beach?
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
4474
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Does God change His mind?
|
on: August 09, 2009, 08:39:01 PM
|
One of the reasons that i stress the need for
the mind to be engaged in this life is that we never intend to do harm,
or work against unity. I believe that the majority of people that we
live with in community have not degenerated where they are at a place
where they do something with a malicious intent. Most of the
developments of oddity in a society are from a lack of understanding.
This is why we believe that its not about us in the sense that we are
required first to know who God is. But at the same time since everyone
carries around a certain false view of who God is then they in a sense
spread that image onto another person. It is like having a transfusion
and then those who are receiving it get some of the blood . Well this
kind of blood will determine if you will catch that virus or whether
there is no harm in it.
Well its the same thing in the spiritual
realm. People do not set out to do harm, they are interested in working
to create unity. But the blood has no doctrine in it. Its blood that is
mixed with all kinds of different intentions. I mean, that sin is not
necessarily from falling into temptation. But sin is a power that is
part of our flesh. Since we all are carriers of sin then we have motives
that are not genuine in dealing with other people. Now then this is
why the best kind of transfusion is a blood filled with the word of God.
As Luther said , he wanted to bleed the word of God when he was cut.
The point being that the danger is not in the kind of maliciousness
toward someone. I am talking about in a hateful way. The danger is in
the blood that is full of flesh, vain glory, covetousness, jealousy,
godlessness etc.
This is why when we talk about what is the
difference between what is revealed and what is just a desire that comes
from a man, we are talking about passing on something that is entirely
unlike the other.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
4475
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Does God change His mind?
|
on: August 08, 2009, 11:43:31 PM
|
I'm just asking for a moratorium on the difficult cut-n-pastes and five-dollar words on newbie threads. Hmmmmm , what does moratorium mean? hehe
4477
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Was Christ "fully" human?
|
on: August 08, 2009, 01:14:55 PM
|
." Why was not Christ, after he rose from the
dead, during his stay upon earth, with his disciples, as he was before?
The very different states that Christ and his disciples were now in,
would not allow of it. Christ, before his death, while in his
humiliation, was in a like state with them. He was subject to hunger and
thirst, as they were; he needed sleep as they did; he needed the like
defence from the weather that they did, and the like: but when he was
risen from the dead, the case was exceedingly altered; he then began his
exaltation. He put off mortality, and all the infirmities of his body.
The nature of his body was different from theirs, as things celestial
differ from things terrestrial. Mortal beings are not apt for a
cohabitation with immortal; nor terrestrial with celestial; nor
corruption with incorruption. God will not thus mix and confound heaven
and earth." J Edwards
4482
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: Questions
|
on: August 08, 2009, 09:08:15 AM
|
Genesis 27
11 Jacob said to Rebekah his
mother, "But my brother Esau is a hairy man, and I'm a man with smooth
skin. 12 What if my father touches me? I would appear to be tricking him
and would bring down a curse on myself rather than a blessing."
13 His mother said to him, "My son, let the curse fall on me. Just do what I say; go and get them for me."
This
whole idea of substitution is seen in the fact that there is a meta
narrative running in the weakness and sin of man. So that the question
as to the real motive in explaining guilt and innocence is rapped up in
the idea of substitution. This explanation of the reality to produce a
good outcome is seen in God using the sin of man to accomplish His
redemptive purposes in exalting this idea of substitution in using the
sin to accomplish that end. This is why sin is not really valued by the
threat of punishment but each sin has a curse as the punishment.This is
why the covenant of grace is the only moral hope. There really is no in
between autonomy. Same thing here with the Apostle Romans 9 3For I
could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the
sake of my brothers, those of my own race, 4the people of Israel.
This is why if we are going to error it is going to be toward antinomianism.
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment