Heres what the bible says... we do not know
the entire truth about ourselves. If we saw ourselves before God as we
really were then we would be destroyed. You say.. thats making
excuses... but if we have the liberty to shield ourselves at any point
from the absolute truth about ourselves then we have the liberty to
judge others based upon our lack of pure equity. If we are totally
corrupted then there is no time where we are not bias. So we are not
self repenters. But we repent in light of our inability to judge
ourselves without sin. Unless we prove to be naive in our subjective
imagination of real objectivity. But the bible says that we always
excuse ourselves and accuse others. This is the real problem. Its
creating goodness by our ability to fudge what we judge to be objective
truth. So we let Christ life in us be our true acceptance. We
can use self repentance as the means to put the flesh to death. But the
bible says that there is only one means to put the flesh to death...
that is through the Spirit. And if any one does not have the Spirit of
Christ then he does not belong to Christ. Being transformed by the
renewing of our minds is to repent as a believer. Or its having the word
of Christ dwell in your richly. Because repentance is a change of mind.
We are unable to effect our own willing good. We must be controlled by
the mind of Christ. Or we must be made able by the Spirit alone. The
bible says that if we confess our sins He is faithful and just to
forgive us... if we say that we have no sin we deceive ourselves and the
truth is not in us. We avoid both extremes. We cannot say that
our confession earns our forgiveness. Nor can we say our confessing
makes us sinless. We must conclude that God alone determines our being
acceptable in the doctrine of Justification by faith. So that repentance
is having an understanding of our own weaknesses along with a deep
understanding of the nature of sin. Repentance is a way of thinking or
its dwelling in the goodness and grace of God because we are unable. Its
not necessarily confession of sin. That can be legalistic.
| 2987
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: When does grace end and consequences begin?
|
on: November 07, 2010, 12:29:18 AM
|
jim:
"grace does not = license to sin all you like and be presumptuous or
even contemptuous of God's grace. Nor does grace = indulging people or
being passive with those engaged in sinful/harmful practices."
K_k:
Yes. Where there is no repentance there is no reception of grace.
But if a person is trying to change, has a heart turning toward God,
then grace abounds. Jesus spoke boldly in confrontation with the
pharisees and sadducees. The grace they needed was to humble themselves
before their Maker, but they refused to recognize Him.
If
someone is using drugs habitually, they usually need to face
consequences before they can turn away from them toward God, which is
repentance. As long as chronic drug use seems enjoyable and free of
harmful consequences (which is an illusion of course), then the addict
is doomed to deterioration.
Sometimes grace is the ability to
firmly confront a friend who is using, and letting them know that you
love them, and will stand by them all they way when they want help to
get off the drugs, but that you don't want to participate in their
self-destruction -- come see my as soon as you want help, but in the
meantime we'll pray for you, especially that you find Christ Who will
set you free.
As Jim indicated, grace does not equal passive
acceptance of self-dectructive sin. That is a distortion which satan
and crew have promoted well in our culture, since it paralyzes Believers
away from acting in the best interests of addicted loved ones. And
their best interest is almost always to face the results of their
behavior as soon as possible. The longer we "cover" for a hurting
friend, the longer and deeper the descent into misery.
First
repentance is one side of faith. Faith is a gift. So repentance cannot
earn grace. But grace precedes repentance. Repentance is not an act of
contrition. But repentance is simply turning to Christ. Grace is the
ability that proceeds repenting and believing. Repentance is not sorrow.
Repentance is not leaving a sin. Repentance is not confessing to one
another. Repentance is simply believing and trusting in Christ for
everything. Repentance is not a one time act but it is a way of life. Second
the addiction to drugs is a physical addiction. After many tries to
leave drugs through the process of drying the person out ..eventually
the person will gain the strength to overcome the addiction. The
spiritual part is just a confession away and the person is healed. The
physical addiction should be dealt with and spiritual growth is
necessary to no longer be defined by the addiction. There are some
things we do over and over again that we enjoy. These are not addictions
but enjoyments. So we dont want to go the other way and put someone
under legalism.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
2994
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: The coming of the great Apocalypse
|
on: November 02, 2010, 02:55:09 PM
|
MyBigGod,
This
past weekend my pastor mentioned a recent interview with Billy Graham
where he talked about his eye sight going bad, he has
macular-degenration. He said he regrets not committing more scripture to
memory.
I just wanted to encourage you to keep up the memorizing, it's certainly worth the effort!
Thank
you LC... i hope to get this book... its time for me to try to master
this book as much as i can. Seeing that i have gained a lot from
memorizing the other worship book ... that is the Psalms.. there are
many parallels in Rev. to the worship in the Psalms. Rev. is sort of
like a love- praise language of God in a Jewish context. Roy i
have a lot of questions come up as i am memorizing this book of which i
am in between this happening just after the resurrection or in the
future in a shorter time period. Heres a verse that i am holding in my
mind as i seek for answers in the rest of the book. Rev5: 5 Then one of the elders said to me, “Do not weep! See, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, has triumphed. This is obviously post cross and ascension. My question is this historical or future? amil or post mil?
|
Remove
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
2998
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: The coming of the great Apocalypse
|
on: October 31, 2010, 01:19:00 PM
|
Job 1 6 One day the angels [a] came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan also came with them. 7 The LORD said to Satan, "Where have you come from?" Satan answered the LORD, "From roaming through the earth and going back and forth in it."
8 Then the LORD said to Satan, "Have you considered my servant Job? There is no one on earth like him; he is blameless and upright, a man who fears God and shuns evil."
Ok
Roy.. i am ready for some more of those word studies... do you believe
in a literal earthly kingdom? i dont care about the word studies that
are presented like a secret puzzle. If you believe in an earthly kingdom
than what historical position of end times do you agree with? Who other
than Roy supports Roy s word studies?
Here are two distinct
realms and places... God never changes... He will renew this whole
entire eternal order to its original pre Adamic state.
Revelation is this entire book... but there are many revealings in the bible. Dont be so swat at a Nat and swallow a camel.
There
are three heavens in scripture... one of which is where God has a local
throne. I really dont have time to argue with you about your puzzle.
Just check the historical studies. 2 Peter 3:3-13This is not written
in comparative language..i cant remember the other form...but this is
an overlapping language.
I dont know where you get the idea from
this passage .. i mean just looking at it in the english it is clear
that we will end up with a new heaven and a new earth.. simular to this
one.
2 Peter 3 8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one
thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand
years as one day. This verse here that you brought up .. you must
have forgotten to do a Roy word study... God is outside of time. If you
read... most historical theologians distinguish eternity from time. Can
you show me someone who agrees with you? Where are you coming from? Do
you stand alone in your word studies.?
Roy i have given you one
opinion.. thought transportation..... you have given me a whole bunch of
opinions that do not have any historical reference.
Roy...Again, I am not a dispensationalist, nor do I accept dispensational teaching in any respect.
If
i am not mistaken sir... I have read somewhere in these post that you
believe in a literal kingdom on earth.. There is only on camp that holds
that position... Dispensationalist. I mean... that really means
anything in present day distinguishing of camps. I am not claiming that
you are a dispensationalist in the literal sense but one who holds a
dispensationalist position.... sorry i should have point to it as a kind
of metaphor... you must have swallowed another camel.
Trinitarian
doctrine... sorry for the dirty word... historical doctrine.. sorry for
the mis interpretative method. But the Father is one with Christ in
substance.... "If you have seen Christ you have seen the Father".... i
dont see any thing that is contrary to what i have written .. thats the
third camel... One in substance and two in Persons. I just showed you
the scripture that refutes your word puzzle refuting me.
Revelation
is not three passages of scripture... its a bunch of former revealings
culminated into an explanation of the Revelation. All scripture is God
breathed or it is connected like a bunch of beads on a string. You cant
separate revelation from the entire book of revealings. 4th camel. 
|
Remove
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3000
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Does sinning break fellowship with Jesus?
|
on: October 28, 2010, 01:42:25 PM
|
|
We confuse punishment and the troubles of the
world. Our first instinct is to listen to the counselor voice. Or its
the voice of the post scientific discoveries and studies. What i mean by
post scientific communication is that we no longer allude the the
study... in the 70s generation there was this new method of learning
relationships and it was just gaining ground in the social sciences. I
remember this like the back of my hand..... So they used to say... when
we look at the behavior of the animals and they would give you the
particular paper ... then we get a better view of the problems of
marriage... but now it has been so ingrained in the culture that we
just assume the new relationship communication is the truth. I call this
the counselor voice.
But the believer understands that God
works out all things for the good. We work and God works ... or God
works in us. So we need to see that we are totally dependent on God as
the motif for the second commandment. In other words all other gods are
from this scientific study method. That is human relationships defined
down to the earthly level. Every problem must be solved by God alone. We
can do nothing. Our honor ... or our return of rewards ... is dependent
on God alone! We start communicating wrongly and we add the troubles
that come from the world system to ourselves.
So when we speak
to the post scientific culture we do not speak from the same mindset. So
we say i dont worry because God will work it out... they say... your
responsible... we say yes and thats what scares us because we are such
failures. So that our doctrine produces rest and ease while their
scientific methods produce anxiety ... regret.. sorrow... and
determinism of the counselor voice. They say that the experience of men
and women prove the need to change a behavior. This language comes with a
sub text of scientific studies. We say that God alone is able to change
the situation no matter how bad it is.
We must be dominated by
the biblical mandates. We must not think that we know better. Every
false teaching starts with self talk. Its the talk of the world... its
not seeing God as the beginning and the end of all things. Our sorrows
do not produce our relationship problems but they define who we are in
society. We live before a holy God who knows us better than we know
ourselves. No horizontal relationship is going to make us less
sorrowful. The only hope is coming before God and talking to Him in the
wisdom that we have been taught from our young yrs. We must define our
relationship with God as the holistic understanding of who we are and we
respond in the life that we know we experience with God alone! We must
learn how to unburden our souls to God.. to quiet our souls like a
weened child... totally dependent on his mother... Or we will be looking
in all the wrong places for acceptance and holistic healing. This is
from yrs of talking to myself in the wisdom books.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment