favor... grace... irresistible grace. Cain did not have the favor of God.
God rejected Cain's sacrifice; the text says nothing about God rejecting Cain. As
a matter of fact God favored Cain so much that He took the time to
personally speak and reason with him and warn him about the possible
trouble Cain was about to experience if he made the wrong choice. Maybe
Cain thought there was no way to chose anything other than sin but God
explains that Cain does have the power to master sin. Why would God say such a thing if it wasn't true? And
what's the big deal about mastering sin? Mastering sin doesn't save you
anyway. We are saved by faith in Jesus. The Bible never says God
demands us to be Lawfully perfect to be acceptable. God demands we have
faith in Him to be acceptable. I wonder why You never say we are
save by faith in Christ. You always use the word saved by "Grace" which
in Reform theology does not mean Jesus saves. This is a cover up term to
conceal the another means to salvation...predestination. It appears to
be Christian but it is another Gospel because it down plays faith in
Jesus and assigns the cross as just a means to assuage God's anger
instead of being an Atonement for our sins like the Bible says. How is
this any different than trusting in circumcision to save you. Both seek
other means to be saved. Do you trust in the blood of Christ to save
you? What other way is there? God predestined us IN Christ; NOT,
TO BE in Christ. Once we are believers then we are predestined to be
conformed to the image of Christ and to experience eternal life. We must not allow theologies of confused long dead men to twist the simple meaning of Scripture or do our thinking for us. Everything
is about Jesus in the NT. The Grace of God IS JESUS (Grace is NOT
predestination) Jesus is the Way the Truth and the life. No one can come
to the Father except through Him. Jesus is the GATE, the only way into the sheep fold. How do we know we will go to heaven? Because we accept and believe in Jesus with our whole heart, Just as God told us to do in the NT. There is no other way under heaven to be saved. Thor .
Thor
faith is merely the agency through which we receive salvation. The
object is Christ Himself... we believe in Christ. But in scripture the
object defines how one is identified... we do not define this. Because
faith is a gift as well as grace. So we may think that our faith is a
big deal. But we get this backwards because we do not consider that
since we have nothing to bring except our sin then we are receiving
salvation.... not only at a point and time but also as ongoing.
Salvation is Gods gift to us out of His free grace and unfailing love.
We are receiving all of these saving effects in the form of gifts. Not
only in being given more grace, but also all of the promises. Not only
are receiving our salvation as a gift... but we are receiving hope in
the form of having a defense that we have in Christ. We are also
receiving our daily food, Gods abundant gifts from others and all of the
gifts promised in having the Spirit of God determine our usefulness.
Some of us are drawn out to long for God and so we receive more gifts as
we grow in our faith. As my friend Gene used to say... do not be overly
concerned about getting ... but enjoy the gift. Believing is
also an obedient turning to Christ in all of our lives. We turn to
Christ in prayer... worship.... and the sacraments. This is the
obedience of faith. When we turn to Christ we learn that He is all we
need in this world. If we put other things in place of Christ then it is
not believing in Christ. Seek first His kingdom. But then the promise
is we will be gifted beyond what we could ask or think. Our attitude in
all of life is we want to glorify God in all we do and enjoy Him for all
He gives us. God is always good because He always works the good in our
lives by His giving us everything we need and His defending us. All of
these gifts are ours through faith.
| 3616
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: Governed by Man or God.
|
on: April 08, 2010, 02:12:03 PM
|
mbG:
"We put to death the works of the flesh by the Spirit... alone. All
other ideas of self effort (fail - word addition by K_k)..." K_k: We are in highly precise agreement. Isn't it good when brothers dwell together in harmony!! 
Thanks
Kk i want to tell you that there is nothing that will separate you from
the love of God. He is very fond of you and will not disappoint you.
All of our addictions are forever forgotten... He cannot hold them
against us. He does more than we could ever ask or think. I ask that He
bless you beyond belief.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
3618
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: Governed by Man or God.
|
on: April 08, 2010, 01:38:23 PM
|
Jesus to a wannabe follower: "Come, take up the cross, and follow Me.” Mark 10:21
Jesus
to us: "If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and
take up his cross daily, and follow Me. For whoever desires to save his
life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will save
it." Luke 9:23
Paul: "Put to death, therefore, whatever belongs
to your earthly nature: sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires
and greed, which is idolatry." Col. 3:5
"I affirm, by the boasting in you which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily." 1 Cor. 15:31
"For
if you live according to the flesh you will die; but if by the Spirit
you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live." Romans 8:13 ----- We
have been crucified with Christ, nevertheless we live, yet not us but
Christ lives in us. For Christians this is true. It is also true that
we must experience the putting to death/sleep of our false identities
that are bound up in sin-patterns. This is an on-going process.
Actually,
it is He, in us, who is putting to death what remains of our old nature
in practical reality, but only with our full cooperation. Have we died
in Christ, and been made alive in Him? Yes. Do we need to continue
dieing to anything that separates us from His love? Your call, my
answer is obvious.
Kk We put to death the works of the
flesh by the Spirit... alone.All other ideas of self effort... that
being... a general tendency in us all to dilute the direct teachings of
scripture as if the water from which we drink is mixed with an oil
substance, or when we are eating meat it is mostly bones. But the Spirit
teaches in one truth that has the spiritual understanding of the rest
of the truth. The bible is one long chain. When he is talking
about dividing scripture he is not talking about slicing it up in pieces
or in different times. The gospel has always been in God alone. But he
is talking about the application of scripture to an individual. All
other ways of man in gaining righteousness are what all false religions
are founded on. When i have been disagreeing with you of your
epistemology it is over our difference in biblical interpretation. It
always comes down to that.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3621
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: What is legalism?
|
on: April 08, 2010, 11:16:56 AM
|
mbG:
"Cain did not have the favor of God. The context is that the Lords
favor determined the relationship they had to the command."
K_k:
I think the context shows that Cain decided what offering to bring to
God, while Abel did as God desired. Abel foreshadowed the sacrifice of
Christ on the Cross. Cain ignored any spiritual promptings or
instructions he may have had in order to "do his own thing".
mbG:
"What does God say to a reprobate? He says.. well if you would do all
that the law requires then you will be accepted. Well, that is true. But
it doesnt do a bit of good unless it is applied in salvation by the
Spirit."
K_k: No one can do all that the law requires unless
they do everything with perfect love of God and man, as Jesus
demonstrated then, and now demonstrates in us.
If you
look at the ot you will find that the focus was not on the sacrifice
itself. There were more sacrifices that were acceptable than the
unblemished lamb. And it had already been established after the initial
fall that there needed to be a life taken in order to be covered in the
righteousness of Christ. But that was prophecy that salvation could only
come through a God -Man. This brings the focus on the spiritual
dimensions of redemption... that is God was in a battle with satan.
There was only one hope... a coming redeemer who would crush the
Serpents head... a fatal blow. This is why no man... including these men
who were ordained to perform the sacrifices ... were good enough to be
the mode though which there would be a covering for the daily sins of
the people. The problems were not with the continual performance of
bringing sacrifices to God. The problems were the presumption of the
people that they would trust in these means to make them rite before a
holy and eternal God. These sacrifices were not eternal but temporary
until the seed of the woman would come and crush the Serpents head. This
was established that God would seek out man and cover Him in the
garden. And here in Cain and Abel God again shows that He alone is
seeking men. I favor Abel over Cain. Because i do not think it is in the
appearance of a mans work that brings a proper sacrifice. After all
both kinds of men in national Israel were trained in religious
performance and ritual. So that God would be God. In order that
salvation would be seen as covenant promise and not according to
performance. God was saying that because it was His choice as to who
would be covenant keepers and who would be covenant breakers that it
would be a display that salvation is eternally set before the foundation
of the earth. God comes into time and will not be silent as He in a
national way gathers His people on a daily basis. Because He alone gets
the glory for salvation...then He alone is able to judge. The focus in
the OT is not on mans gifts and sacrifices but on God who is faithful to
save men. Our God comes and will not be silent. A fire devours
before Him... he destroys His enemies on every side.... and around Him a
tempest rages.. that being He is eternally present in all events in
history as they are made to occur in the choices of man. He comes as
judge and redeemer. He faithfully protects His people in this mystery
salvation and at the same time destroys His enemies. God was accusing
Cain to his face. Check it out yourself. Here is some humor
of God.. i mean... given that we speak these words in a rather
stouthearted way... its kind of like rap rhythm. hehe Ps. 50 8 I do not rebuke you for your sacrifices or your burnt offerings, which are ever before me. 9 I have no need of a bull from your stall or of goats from your pens, 10 for every animal of the forest is mine, and the cattle on a thousand hills. 11 I know every bird in the mountains, and the creatures of the field are mine. 12 If I were hungry I would not tell you, for the world is mine, and all that is in it. 13 Do I eat the flesh of bulls or drink the blood of goats? 14 Sacrifice thank offerings to God, fulfill your vows to the Most High, If you speak this there is a certain condescending to its rhythm. i love the rhythm in this one. 15 and call upon me in the day of trouble; I will deliver you, and you will honor me."- Predestination. Where did this God go? Possibly what the apostles meditation for Ephesians. He mentions some of this in Rom. He liked this one.
|
Remove
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3622
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: Thoughts?
|
on: April 07, 2010, 10:16:00 PM
|
Do we actually need a label, like calvinist, or lutherist, tacked on to Christian (or perhaps, ChristIsInMe-an)?
Will
there really be baptists, methodists, catholics, 5 point calvinists, 2
point non-denoms, etc, in the soon coming Kingdom? Or just us kids of
the King?
Is your definition of a Christian a person who
does not label? I feel labeled. Kk every connection in love is
expressed by agreement or defense. (a pragmatic expression either
negative or positive in the level of passion) Jesus labeled every idea
as either loving Him or hating Him.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3623
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: Governed by Man or God.
|
on: April 07, 2010, 10:07:12 PM
|
Would
like to "go back and read Gene" but i can barely keep up with the
threads i'm participating in. Add Gene to the wannado-someday stack.
mbG: "It took me awhile to feel comfortable with Genes idea that the soul was perfect and the body was sinful."
K_k:
I am open to Scripture-based correction, but at this point i see the
Spirit of Christ (Who is Holy), living in me as perfect, and any direct
spiritual connection He has established in me that is wholly surrendered
to His Will.
Yet i make choices. I choose wrongly. I sin. Is
my true identity the perfect sinless child of God He has declared?
Absolutely. Is my daily reality identity one of perfect sinlessness?
Absolutely not.
I see truth in Paul's statements that in Christ i
have His righteousness. Yet i need to "die daily", putting the flesh
to death/sleep. And i'm not very good at doing that at present. Even
Paul said,
"Not that I have now attained [this ideal], or have
already been made perfect, but I press on to lay hold of (grasp) and
make my own, that for which Christ Jesus (the Messiah) has laid hold of
me and made me His own. I do not consider, brethren, that I have
captured and made it my own [yet]..." Philipians 3:12-13
And as
we saw before, Paul called himself the "chief of sinners" in present
tense, not past tense. So, putting it together, we have him saying he
is a great sinner who has not yet attained perfection. He, and we, will
be made perfect when we "see Him as He is", for we will be made like
Him.
Until then, we take up our crosses under His guidance and
empowerment, that we may become more willing to let Him have His perfect
Way with us, since He is the "author and perfecter of our faith".
What
bothers me about Gene's thinking is that it sounds close to Gnosticism
in a certain manner. But i don't want to sidetrack the topic to go
there.
Let me instead, propose a different analogy. Consider a
seed, any kind of seed. In a certain sense, there is an "image" of the
final plant built into the genetics of that seed. The ideal exists in
it yet must be grown into the end product by dieing to itself as a seed,
and then as a sprout, and then as a child version, and then as a
fruit-bearing adult.
Consider that as Christians we have the
ideal image, the Spirit of Christ (Who is Holy) living in us. And we
must go through a series of "deaths to self" on the way to becoming the
person that God knows He is making to be His eternal kid.
Objections?
We
already died to self. We no longer need to go back and put self off of
the throne. Jesus did it for us. When we were regenerated we were also
given a new will. He destroyed our old will and He gave us a new one.
The ot concept of this is that we now live as if He has already given
His stamp of approval on our causes since He will defend...uphold ...
and faithfully lead us to the end by defending His own name. Self in
us now is our propensity to failure... wandering... hardness... and
weakness. But we are not over concerned because we cannot utterly fall.
So we trust in Him alone. As long as we are on this earth we are going
to stumble into doing what we do not want to do. The change comes when
we find He still loves us. Our wort's in the self are proof that He
accepts us ...not by our own strength but in His strength and love. The
more we are accepted in wandering off the more we will want to please
Him. He does not deal with us as if we were mentioned as equal or better
able than the other people in our world. He deals with us in our
frailty and weakness. Its like this... He exalts His name by loving His
own without proving that one will be more able than the other... but
because we all belong to Him ... He loves us all perfectly so that He
gets the glory for our loving one another by His loving through us.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3624
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: Thoughts?
|
on: April 07, 2010, 09:36:05 PM
|
mbG, I think you may be feeling about Jim like i felt with our recent communication problem.
But, then, feelings, especially humor, don't come across very well on-line sometimes, do they, even with smiley faces,
There is a history here Kk... i do appreciate your concern tho.... but i am not as serious as Jimbo.. he knows it... My
rule is that if it is about some practical advice ... i usually do not
point to anything substantive in this forum setting..so its really a way
for me to lighten up and have fun. But if we are talking about theo
then i get serious. Jim knows ... please lighten up He says calling
him a 4 pointer is name calling.... oh well... everyone here berates me
about being a Calvinist... never had Jim come to my side on that one.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3626
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: What is legalism?
|
on: April 07, 2010, 09:20:16 PM
|
Ah...we
are saved by placing our faith in Christ because of his sacrifice for
us and not because we have inherited salvation. The Grace of God is
Jesus and we are saved through faith in Him. God doesn't have to pick
believers because his creation turned into a failure. God told Cain that
he could master sin but Cain chose not to. That very early incident
alone shows that God never took away man's ability to choose. What does
Calvin say about that?
Thor
Genesis 4 The LORD
looked with favor on Abel and his offering, 5 but on Cain and his
offering he did not look with favor. So Cain was very angry, and his
face was downcast. 6 Then the LORD said to Cain, "Why are you
angry? Why is your face downcast? 7 If you do what is right, will you
not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at
your door; it desires to have you, but you must master it." 8
Now Cain said to his brother Abel, "Let's go out to the field." [d] And
while they were in the field, Cain attacked his brother Abel and killed
him. favor... grace... irresistible grace. Cain did not have the favor
of God. The context is that the Lords favor determined the relationship
they had to the command. Now look what happens when the law is directed
at Cain. He goes out and kills abel. The law speaks death. This is just
what Calvin teaches. You know a man will hear the law and it
is only applicable in a saving way if it is the Spirit that applies it
in a saving way. Its interesting that Cain was angry... mans natural
response to God. What does God say to a reprobate? He says.. well if you
would do all that the law requires then you will be accepted. Well,
that is true. But it doesnt do a bit of good unless it is applied in
salvation by the Spirit.
|
Remove
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3628
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: Thoughts?
|
on: April 07, 2010, 08:34:09 PM
|
MBG
- Baiting someone via name-calling isn't real humorous - especially
when you're the one on the receiving end of it. I don't appreciate your
saying what you said nor doing what you did.
Nor am I being condescending in what I'm writing to you.
Nor is my daughter married. She never has been married.
And
it is for things like this that I'm saying you need to post to someone
else. Between your baiting via name-calling, your false accusations
toward me, and your talking about my daughter's situation - when you
don't even know what it was - I simply don't need to read stuff like
that.
Jim
Ok Jim... i have never met a person more easy to communicate with... sorry for the humor.... ouch.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3630
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: What is legalism?
|
on: April 07, 2010, 07:42:46 PM
|
The Moralist’s Catechism Posted on February 6, 2010 by R. Scott Clark Moralism
is the teaching (doctrine) that God approves (accepts or justifies) of
us either because we have cooperated with his grace (semi-Pelagianism)
or because we have kept the law without his help (Pelagianism).
According to moralism God approves of us because of what we are
inherently, intrinsically not because of what Christ has done for us
(obeyed, died, been raised) and certainly not because of the imputation
(reckoning) to believers of what Christ has done but because of what he
has wrought in us by grace and cooperation with grace. In the
history of Christianity, beginning with the Ebionites, Jewish Christians
that taught the necessity of observing the Mosaic law in order to be
accepted by God, there have always been moralists in the church. Indeed,
in the medieval period, moralism became the majority view in the
church. The Reformation was a rejection of moralism in favor of the
gospel of God’s grace toward the unrighteous. Nevertheless, moralism
persisted in the Anabaptist movement, in Romanism, and among ostensible
evangelicals such as Andreas Osiander and others. In the seventeenth
century moralism returned in the Arminian/Remonstrant movement, in the
Socinian movement, and appeared most subtly in Reformed circles in the
teaching of Richard Baxter (whom many Reformed folk today hail
unqualifiedly as a hero but whose moralism John Owen excoriated) and in
the neonomian movement in the 18th century in Scotland. It is still with
us in the self-described Federal Vision movement. excoriated -to
denounce or berate severely; flay verbally: He was excoriated for his
mistakes. In Reformed circles moralism often persists undetected
because it begins by sounding orthodox but like the scorpion the sting
is in the tail. Pay close attention to this catechism and see how well
you do at playing the Reformed version of Where’s Wally?* Q: What is justification? A:
Justification is God’s initial declaration of righteousness upon those
who trust in Christ, live in the grace of baptism, and obey the gospel. Q: What is faith? A: Faith is repentance, trust in Christ, and faithfulness. Q: What is repentance? A: Faith Q: What is the gospel? A: The gospel is that everyone who believes and cooperates with grace will be justified. Q: What is grace? A: A free, unmerited gift that God gives to all the faithful members of the covenant. Q: What is the covenant? A: It is God’s unconditional, free promise that if we obey his gospel and cooperate with grace we will be justified. Q: What is God’s law? A: God’s law is his moral will revealed in creation, at Sinai, i.e., the gospel. Q: What is the distinction between law and gospel? A: It is the distinction between the old law and the new. Q: What is regeneration? A:
Regeneration is the new life conferred upon those who are baptized and
thereby united to Christ, elected, justified, adopted, and who continue
in that grace. Q. What is baptism? A: Baptism is that promise
to the children of believers and to adult converts and the sacrament
whereby we are elected, united to Christ, justified, and adopted if we
continue in grace. Q: What is the Lord’s Supper? A: That sacrament whereby God renews his covenant to save those who believe and cooperate with the grace given in baptism Q: Who should come to the table of the Lord? A: All baptized persons Q: What is perseverance of the saints? A: Perseverance is cooperation by the baptized with the grace given them in baptism and the supper unto final justification. Q: Can a person lose his salvation? A: No one can lose their salvation unless they fail to cooperate sufficiently with the grace of baptism. Q: What is final justification? A:
God’s recognition of the inherent, intrinsic Spirit-wrought sanctity
and righteousness by grace and cooperation with grace in those only who
have trusted in Christ and have kept their part of the covenant. *That’s the UK version of Where’s Waldo?
| 3631
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: Thoughts?
|
on: April 07, 2010, 07:21:09 PM
|
What
I am is a Christian. If you want to know what I believe about
something, the polite thing to do is ASK me, not bait me by calling
names. I think that, at this point, it is probably best for you to post
to someone else.
JR
Thanks for your
condescending attitude. Christian obedience is an expression of the
truth as it relates to ourselves and others. I do not think that humor
is evil ... oh well until another hard conflict there Jimbo. Ive been thinking about the problems of your daughter marriage... may God bless her.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
3632
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: Governed by Man or God.
|
on: April 07, 2010, 06:22:44 PM
|
Believers
are perfect in Christ, not in the flesh. I can't say for sure about
you, but i know i have acted like a fool many times since receiving
Christ, and i doubt that i am done with that. He has had to break my
self-confidence numerous times so that i could learn to depend more upon
His guidance and enabling. More of Him and less of me.
mbG: "Pride is a mark of ignoring God."
K_k:
Yes, and i am surprised if you haven't been guilty, as i have been, of
ignoring Him numerous times in your Christian "walk".
mbG: "we are not defined as sinners. We are saints who struggle with sin."
K_k: What comes to mind are some verses, the first by Paul:
"This
is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus
came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am chief." 1 Tim. 1:15
NKJV
This doesn't sound like past tense but rather present.
Yet, he also made clear we are saints in Christ. The resolution that
makes sense to me currently is that we are sinners in the sense that we
still sin. And the closer we are to Him the more we will see our
imperfections. We are saints in the sense that we have the
righteousness of Christ imputed to us now, and will have it fully given
to us at the Resurrection.
"Beloved, we are [even here and] now
God's children; it is not yet disclosed (made clear) what we shall be
[hereafter], but we know that when He comes and is manifested, we shall
[as God's children] resemble and be like Him, for we shall see Him just
as He [really] is." 1 John 3:2 Amplified
Kk... i hope you
go back and read Gene... i think it would be something that would give
you an idea where this forum and there is also another one had been
taken over the yrs. Although i used to disagree with Gene over his
theology of the soul and body i am more on his side than the two dog
side. It took me awhile to feel comfortable with Genes idea that the
soul was perfect and the body was sinful. Obviously i do not believe
this but i have ... since then struggle with my own thinking on the
christian identity. And in the past there have been people who opposed
the idea that there were any kind of special Christians. And so in the
environment we have today where the predominate ideas of a persons
thinking form an irrational struggle with a christian identity. If all
things are equal in our lives then we are kind of like being brainwashed
into a lower christian community identity. There is a tendency as a
temptation to treat every thing in a balance way so that we also do not
react to these things in a real way. And i thought that maybe Genes
understanding of something perfect in us would create neurotic
identification. But now i have come to see that the two dog theology
creates neurosis. I hope we can discuss these things on a more practical
level. I get this perception in the average church spirit. Not
my church. I mean that there is a sense in which one sinner is able to
have his own comfort zone and it would not be a problem to establish
views that would keep him from an over sorrowful condition of neurosis. I
mean most people take in the christian message as having a lot of
static in their perception of how it relates to reality. An individual
can do trading in his thinking that will offset his tendency to feed one
dog over another. But when you get a group of christian two dog sinners
together then the bar that is raised in order to have a sense of peace
is to make on the one hand a virtue out of ignorance and on the other
hand to overemphasize the reasons to lack disagreement. Its
kind of like a Father image in which there are pressure points that
create inward rage and then a need to build up a certain resistance to
keep it under control. The environment is that we shouldnt do what we
do, so that our truth is that we dont do what we just did because there
needs to be the guru and the pupil. This is a neurotic environment. Or
its suppressing by self determination. As Edwards would say. Which is if
there are two opposite choices of equal importance and that defines
human ability to be self exerting then there would be no reason or cause
to chose one thing over another. If there is no cause as a principle of
importance then the object that is chosen has all the power. Think
about this and ask me questions.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3634
|
Forums / Main Forum / Re: Thoughts?
|
on: April 07, 2010, 12:32:33 PM
|
Guys
seriously... lets be intellectual honest here. Because there are more
than style points. There are disagreements about doctrinal issues here
as well. Not one of you guys is a five point Calvinist. Nor do you
uphold the WCF or the LBC. You guys need to say that you disagree with
Steve about the doctrines of grace. Thats the truth.
With
all due respect, MBG, I really wonder whether you can articulate
accurately the beliefs/doctrines of either John MacArthur, Steve Brown,
or the beliefs/doctrines of everyone here well enough to make the
judgments you have above.
And Changeling, with all due respect, I
wonder whether you've really done a serious comparison study between
the WCF and what John MacArthur teaches to make the judgments you have
above.
Reality: We are dealing here with people who each have speaking and writing ministries that span well over
20 years. In view of that reality, it should be pretty obvious that,
by isolating one part of his writings from another (a terribly easy
thing to do, considering the amount of their writings), we can make
either John or Steve look bad/wrong/whatever.
Jim
Actually
Jimbo... since you are being so snarly, narly, poo pooing me... i have
been close to both ministries through being under pastors from both
ministries... i know this almost first hand... i am more familiar than
you think... i like John.. just dont want to talk about my personal
experience...this is not the place... the best preparation for pastors
by far is RTS Orlando... ok Jim the 4 pointer? What is that ... a
Calvinist in your dreams? lol Ok.. Just like SB says.. we Calvinist
can be a bit mean.. sorrwwyyyy
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3635
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Reformed Doctrine
|
on: April 06, 2010, 08:02:33 PM
|
I should like Calvin, after all I'm into gothic art, and that dood is a dead ringer for Dracula! 
Draculavin hehe
|
3641
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Romans and the Flesh Monster.
|
on: April 06, 2010, 10:51:53 AM
|
mbG:
"God deals with sinners who come to Him as perfect in Christ. Sinners
who are really messed up. I mean they are complete flunkies... nerds...
dweebs... scumbags ... drunks.. wimps .. control freaks... dudes with
hair on their shoulders... bald guys... drug addicts... pornography
lovers and the most creepy dudes on this earth."
K_k: Yes, i
have been a flunky, a nerd, a dweeb, a scumbag, a drunk, a wimp, a
control freak, a dude with shoulder length hair, a semi-bald guy, a drug
addict, a porn lover and one of the most creepy dudes on this earth.
And
He loves me as if i were His only Child, same as He does all of us.
And He can see clearly the sin patterns that remain while also seeing
the righteousness of Christ He is building in me as well as has imputed
to me.
He is not blind, but chooses to focus on what He is
making of the "material" that remains. Just like the great Artist He
is. I've heard that Michelangelo said, when he was questioned about the
inspiration for his famous statue of David, that when he looked at the
block of marble he saw David imprisoned in it. And it wasn't so much
that Michelangelo tried to create a statue, but rather freed David by
chipping away the rock that held him prisoner.
Selah
Kk...
i agree with you here... what i am confused about with you is that if
He has done all these things dont you think it is the reality of the
will as well? I mean... this distinction between having a totally new
will given to us or a will of the former self that is under some kind of
bondage. God does not force Himself... His ways are irresistible and we
go from impossible to possible because His will is our will. We do not
have any mark of the paradigm of the old will.
|
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3643
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Prayers
|
on: April 06, 2010, 10:19:46 AM
|
Rarely, but once in a while, i experience a little of what Jesus said as He was about to raise Lazarus from the dead:
"And
Jesus lifted up His eyes and said, “Father, I thank You that You have
heard Me. And I know that You always hear Me, but because of the people
who are standing by I said this, that they may believe that You sent
Me.” Now when He had said these things, He cried with a loud voice,
“Lazarus, come forth!” And he who had died came out bound hand and foot
with graveclothes, and his face was wrapped with a cloth. Jesus said to
them, “Loose him, and let him go.” " John 11:41-44
Sometimes it
is not our great ability to pray that counts but our total trust that
our heavenly Dad has the answer prepared for the prayer He has inspired
us to pray. So we can rest in the assurance that He has heard, since He
prompted the request in the first place. And thus we can patiently
wait for His response, which may be "not quite yet, but soon".
Of
course, there are also those times when we seem to need to persist and
persist and practically nag Him. But i think He is just increasing our
dedication, and building our anticipation, so we will take even more joy
in His answer when it comes. And, on the other hand, if the answer is
No, then we will learn that nagging doesn't get Him to do our will,
unless it matches His.
God is not a safety
net God. He did not speak words to be printed down so that man could use
them to create a society of healthy middle class people. Jesus did not
come to get His enemies off the streets. He came so that we could live
with our enemies if need be. One person fully covered in Christ ... the
other person a covenant violator... accepting many gods. Both under the
same roof. Christ is not a prosecutor.. He is a covenant keeping God.
Violating the covenant is not just worshiping other gods...but its
making rules to bring men into a new economy. An economy of people who
enter into a new universal family by keeping those rules. The family
of God are these individual families who have the full rites of Sons of
the Most High God as that by which the covenant is upheld in this
respected authority. This is why the sermon on the mount is not a set of
principles to follow a public universal Christ but they are Christ
working in His church to make a way to prosper in a private paradigm.
Christ has given the church the keys to the kingdom.. whatever is done
in heaven shall be done on earth. This is speaking of the right of not
only its leaders but the families to conduct business in this separate
power structure. Christ upholds this special respect for leaders of
families who are sinners and subject to great trials and temptations.
The sermon is giving this structural kingdom the way to prosper in the
freedom of grace and not under the dominion of this world. It alone
produces that respect.
|
Remove
Reply
Quote
Notify
|
|
|
3645
|
Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Saved? Why are you so sure?
|
on: April 05, 2010, 04:25:43 PM
|
|
We magnify what we do not think as God would
have us to think. So that nothing in this world is acted upon unless
there is some form of communication whether it is in private or public.
Speech does produced evil. But I am not talking about punishing freedom
of speech. But if our speech were corrected then there would be no
crime. So that our speech become the real weapons. There is no one who
develops a system of man unless it is through a thinking process and it
is delivered on the tongue. The only way to produce true compassion,
love, faithfulness is changing the way to speak so that it as God would
want. We all have loose words... we joke around without thinking and we
say things that hurt our brothers in Christ.
God speaks both
blessing and cursing. And we do that to. But we never curse our brothers
in Christ. Paul pronounced a curse in Galatians. We are required to say
in response the the judgment of the law... may it be as you say. But
this is a very pragmatic action.
This is why we are given the
community of faith because we no longer belong to the world. Any one who
loves the world... the love of the Father is not in him. But when the
days are evil then the world is in the community of faith. So these days
are more pragmatic than we would like them to be.
But we also
have this inner world in which a word is like an action. We learn to
define these ways of dealing with ourselves by the ideas that are
introduced to us as we form our own personalities. This is why most of
the world lives as imaginative about personal power and connection in
relationships. Because the ideas we have produce the levels of passion
that we are attached to in relation to objects and people. This is where
we must determine to be transformed. This is why the apostle says that
we are to be transformed by the renewing of our minds. Because we have a
world of ideas that act in us in the way of passionate access before we
act toward one another. This is what creates this imaginative world.
The imaginative world is an immature child. Because when we think for
ourselves... i mean... without a comparison to Gods thoughts then we
live in a world in which we use our words as weapons.
|
|
|
 |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment