Wednesday, November 11, 2015

7969  Forums / Theology Forum / Reasonably Biblical And Biblically Reasonable on: January 26, 2007, 07:04:33 PM
Quote
Calvin was excommunicated so he had to fabricate and hide many things, to start his own church. Cavlin had no authority and was very angry and full of hatred for the Catholic Church and was sifted like wheat by the devil.

There is in the Hebrew Greek and Latin two words for the word "you" that we don`t  have in english , one 'you' is plural eg. 'you people' and the other 'you' is singular  eg.'you Peter'.

" Simon ,Simon, listen! Satan has demanded to sift all of you (plural) like wheat , but I have prayed for you (singular) that your own faith may not fail; and you (singular), when once you (singular) have turned back, strengthen your bretheren"  

This is where you see the infallible office!

So anyone not unitied to  the Office of Peter is sifted like wheat!
\"For Calvin, the need for the Reformation was fundamentally this: Rome had \"destroyed the glory of Christ in many ways — by calling upon the saints to intercede, when Jesus Christ is the one mediator between God and man; by adoring the Blessed Virgin, when Christ alone shall be adored; by offering a continual sacrifice in the Mass, when the sacrifice of Christ upon the Cross is complete and sufficient\" (see note 9), by elevating tradition to the level of Scripture and even making the word of Christ dependent for its authority on the word of man (see note 10). Calvin asks, in his Commentary on Colossians, \"How comes it that we are 'carried about with so many strange doctrines' (Hebrews 13:9)?\" And he answers, \"Because the excellence of Christ is not perceived by us\" (see note 11). In other words, the great guardian of Biblical orthodoxy throughout the centuries is a passion for the glory and the excellency of God in Christ. Where the center shifts from God, everything begins to shift everywhere. Which does not bode well for doctrinal faithfulness in our own non-God-centered day.\" John Piper
7982  Forums / Theology Forum / Reasonably Biblical And Biblically Reasonable on: January 24, 2007, 11:36:15 AM
Quote
MBG you say:
"Wouldnt you call Christ relationship with the Father , personal? You know in Christ we have an intense personal relationship with our heavenly Father?" Look at Jn. 17

"I and the Father are one" , the Greek word 'one' is 'hen' which means 'one being'.

MBG you have recieved the Gospel and Jesus loves you for it, now all you must do is eat His Flesh and drink His Blood and you will have eternal life and He will raise you up on the last day.
jn 17 is explaining the eternal Sonship of Christ. The Trinity is one in essence and 3 in persons. As persons each person in the trinity has a seperate identy, a seperate self, in which each person has a consciousness , a pleasure in the glorification of each person recieving glory , and each person in oneness giving and recieving love. The Father loves the Son, the Son loves the Father, the Holy Spirit brings glory to the Father and the Son. They are giving love and recieving love in the trinitarian oneness.
This post smells of the i -it syndrome. You seem to be saying the the bread and the wine are equal to the , or entrance into Christ. I am aware that you can be decieved and yet have saving faith. So dont take this the wrong way.
Every thing we believe has consequences. There really is no christian understanding of love until there is an understanding of who Christ is. We are to worship Christ with all of our minds. We are not pragmitist, that is there is no disconnection with how we think of Christ and how we act in a practical way. We are always under the obligation to think correctly even tho we have an understanding by a cause outside of our natural thinking abilities as truths evolve as we begin to understand spiritual truths by the scripture and by the Holy Spirit. Unless we are having our minds transformed with propositional truth and the Spirits application to our understanding then we are decieved in our veiws of the process of worshipiing God in the way He desires us to worship.
The trinitarian love is that the Father is in the Son, The Son is in the Father and we are in the Son and share in the oneness of the Father and the Son in a spiritual way. We are Sons by adoption not by transubstanition. Believing that we are somehow taking the bread as the body of Christ is just flat out idolatry. The christian being in Christ knows the voice of the Father and that voice is the only voice that seperates the truth of the proposition of scripture with idolatrous thinking. We learn to hate idols because they stand in the way of our relationship with Christ by not thinking correctly. It is much better to know the truth and not be able to keep it, than to not know the truth and be decieved into thinking that we are not idolatrous. These propositions from scripture affect the desires of our hearts before we even are able to make the choices in a practical way. The more we are decieved in our minds the more we will be dominate by our imagination and not by the spiritual understanding of the Holy Spirit. Our desires will be directly effected by this lack of knowlege and we will in some way be carnally minded.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
7983  Forums / Theology Forum / Question on: January 24, 2007, 05:49:30 AM
Quote
Hi.
Heres a question: Someone claims to be a Christian maybe four years into the faith, doesn't know every thing yet (no one does even after 40 years) but has an understanding of doctrines but shows no real spiritual growth or love of Christ to fellow believers, never forgives or forgets the slightest offence committed against them and shows no genuine knowledge of the bible, would you consider such a one as that a true Christian?
I know of a person on line who is just like that. she is mean spirited, hateful and unforgiving and unmerciful and yet claims to have a deep understanding of doctrine and makes her boast that she is a Calvinist. I have nothing against Calvinist but John Calvin did not die on the cross for my sins, Jesus did. This person makes her boast in the fact she is well read and knows Calvinistic theology, but she is cold hearted and just plain nasty. Is it possible she was never truly saved? All her Calvinistic friends defend her ungodly actions by saying that she's still a babe in Christ (four years now and she's still in diapers) and the excuse the awful things she does. Any ideas?

Thanks.
It sounds like you have been around her and not just having discussions on line? If so maybe you need to talk to her.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
7984  Forums / Theology Forum / Reasonably Biblical And Biblically Reasonable on: January 24, 2007, 05:42:15 AM
Catholics are not interested in a personal relationship with Jesus, they are only interested in covenant relationship with Jesus which is a total giving of everything one to the other.

Personal relationship with God is just not biblical, and is a horrifying downgrade of what is sacred. You don`t say \"I have a personal relationship with my wife and children\", do you.


Wouldnt you call Christ relationship with the Father , personal? You know in Christ we have an intense personal relationship with our heavenly Father? Look at Jn. 17
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
7985  Forums / Politics Forum / Bush Approval Falls To New Low on: January 24, 2007, 04:49:47 AM
>>By Rush Limbaugh:
>>
>>I think the vast differences in compensation between victims of the
>>September 11 casualty and those who die serving our country in
Uniform
>>are profound. No one is really talking about it either, because you
just
>>don't criticize anything having to do with September 11. Well, I
can't
>>let the numbers pass by because it says something really disturbing
>>about the entitlement mentality of this country. If you lost a family
>>member in the September 11 attack, you're going to get an average of
>>$1,185,000. The range is a minimum guarantee of $250,000, all the way
up
>>to $4.7 million.
>>If you are a surviving family member of an American soldier killed in
>>action, the first check you get is a $6,000 direct death benefit,
half
>>of which is taxable.
>>
>>Next, you get $1,750 for burial costs. If you are the surviving
spouse,
>>you get $833 a month until you remarry. And there's a payment of $211
>>per month for each child under 18. When the child hits 18, those
>>payments come to a screeching halt.
>>
>>Keep in mind that some of the people who are getting an average of
>>$1.185 million up to $4.7 milli on are complaining that it's not
enough
>>Their deaths were tragic, but for most, they were simply in the wrong
>>place at the wrong time. Soldiers put themselves in harms way FOR ALL
OF
>>US, and they and their families know the dangers.
>>
>>We also learned over the weekend that some of the victims from the
>>Oklahoma City bombing have started an organization asking for the
same
>>deal that the September 11 families are getting. In addition to that,
>>some of the families of those bombed in the embassies are now asking
for
>>compensation a s well.
>>
>>You see where this is going, don't you? Folks, this is part and
parcel
>>of over 50 years of entitlement politics in this country. It's just
>>really sad. Every time a pay raise comes up for the military, they
>>usually receive next to nothing of a raise. Now the green machine is
in
>>combat in the Middle East while their families have to survive on
food
>>stamps and live in low-rent housing Make sense?
>>
>>However, our own US Congress voted themselves a raise. Many of you
don't
>>know that they only have to be in Congress one time to receive a
pension
>>that is more than $15,000 per month. And most are now equal to being
>>millionaires plus. They do not receive Social Security on retirement
>>because they didn't have to pay into the system.  If some of the
>>military people stay in for 20 years and get out as an E-7, they may
>>receive a pension of $1,000 per month, and the very people who placed
>>them in harm's way receives a pension of $15,000 per month.
>>
>>I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join
>>ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our
>>sons and daughters who are now
>>
>>fighting.

 
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
7986  Forums / Main Forum / Self Control Vs Gods In Control ... on: January 23, 2007, 04:29:13 PM
God is our refuge, that is we are in a relationship with Him.When we say refuge we are talking about a spiritual oneness that we share in the our being in Christ in the Trinity. We are fully safe in this relationship. We are prone to think that when trouble comes there is something in us that has caused the trouble and there is something in us that causes our relationship with Him to change. We are prone to think that because we are in terrible straits because of our circumstances or because of our sin that our relationship changes. But because we are not the cause our our being in Him in the relationship that we share with our Father in a trinitarian closeness we therefore are surrounded by the loving smile of our Father.
Thats why we must learn to take refuge in Him. Because we are not the cause of our being in Him, we must think thoughts after Him, so that we align ourselves in that kind of confidence ei He is working every thing out without our help. Because there is such a tension in our lives of resting in Christ, and being in the world, with the inward struggle with the flesh, and the devil, we are easily led astray to trust in ourselves away from  this safety and peace. We must see that taking refuge in Him and having peace in the midst of the most sever circumstances is as real as the circumstances in our lives. To begin to understand that kind of peace we must live in the attitude of prayer, that God is going to rescue us and it does not matter how long we wait or how we feel under the burden of the circumstances, we must have one focus, that God alone will rescue us. Unless we have that deep desire we will only increase the anxiety.
Its not the condition of our hearts nor the action we take that will cause us to be any closer to Christ , and change the relationship for the better. It is understanding our need of deliverance and praying that He will deliver in His time. God must not only have our trust that He is sovereign but He must have the trust that our circumstances are encircled by Him so that there is nothing new that will penetrate the circle that He has not planned. He must be the beginning of our rescue and the end of our rescue. He must be the lone purpose in our rescue.
Once we see that nothing will deliver us accept Him then we are learning to rest in Christ.
Unless we have this cause and effect relationship firm in our minds we will have very little desire to have Him listen to our prayers. It is because we see the depth of our inability to do any thing about our relationship to Him in the circumstances and the height of His ability that we can have confidence in prayer. The amount of trust in Him being immediately available to us will determine the kind of confidence we have in seeing through faith the circumstances and the answers evolving in our circumstances. There must be an immediate sense of His presence in our deepest heart pain from the trial. Because we are in a relationship with an immediate friend we must acknowledge that we are indwelt by the triune God, with an immediate power. And His power to deliver surpasses all the weight of any trial. It is immediate and near.
It is not only immediate and near but we are in and eternal immediate powerful nearness. It is always available, in the worst sin, in the worst circumstances , and in the worst pain we can experience. He is not interested in exposing but in delivering. He is always the same no matter what. He does not change. That refuge of power is the place we always go to. We are only required to rest in Christ in the place of refuge. It is not the action of the flesh that will be the place of resting but it is the confidence we have in His power that will cause us to be delivered. The confidence we have comes as we pray with wisdom understanding that we are unable and He is fully able.

ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
7970  Forums / Theology Forum / Catholic Apologists on: January 26, 2007, 06:42:54 PM
Quote
All through the New Testament tells of alot of Apostolic Teaching, 'Tradition', which the Apostles did. They strictly enforced their Traditions to the letter and telling their Bishops to do likewise.

If someone did not follow the traditions of the early church they were treated as a gentile or a taxcollector.

If your Church was not established by Apostolic successors with a direct lineage down the ages, then you will not have Apostolic Tradition, but will have a man made tradition.

If the Jews can maintain their traditions and feasts for thousands of years from the time of Moses for example, then how much more so with the Spirit filled early church which was the Catholic Church?
Just like we got confused by your mis use of universal with how the early church fathers interchanged it with catholic we are also getting confused by your usage of the biblical word tradition. The word means a pattern of behaviour more than a new teaching. In fact Paul would say to follow him, or his pattern of behaviour as he follows Christ. The word is not establishing an embellishment of the apostilic authority or placing leaders as Gods intermediate wizards of new power but is a word that gives leaders authority as they serve in their office as overseers in as examples, ie pauls letter to the Ephesian elders is the pattern of new testament leadership. It really is one of gaining respect rather than a gift of authority.

No comments:

Post a Comment