Wednesday, November 11, 2015

8041  Forums / Main Forum / Complete! on: January 10, 2007, 02:26:35 PM
Thanks, g-man I do enjoy conversing with you as  well , I am not sure what you mean by my being in Christ.  Let me think through this with you. I do not want to put words in you mouth, but really i am trying to think along with what you are saying.  First , being in Christ does not seem to me to be rapped up in a state of existence that changes from one form to another. As if i were acending a ladder by a sort of non- being paradigm. That is the less of a being i become the more i will be in Christ. I am not annialated in order to get lost in Christ. Because Christ is in heaven as a high preist and i am on earth locally. My being in Christ is being indwelt by the Holy Spirit so that when the Holy Spirit is present , Christ is present by His Spirit , and the Father is present.
When we are born we are born body and soul. We are body, we are soul. There is not a natural seperation , because we were made for eternity to be one in body and soul. Sin caused this unatural seperation. When the bible talks about Christ body, it means all of Christ present in the space and time. When the bible talks about Christ soul, it means all of Christ being present in space and time. There is no seperation. These faculties cannot be inter- mixed.
It is the same thing with how we exist. We are at all times bodily present and our souls are present in the being in Christ paradigm. Our 5 senses are an intregal part of being in Christ. These senses are not intrinsically evil but are in a state of corruption, because they are mixed with sin. Our bodies are an intregal part of being in Christ. We worship God with our bodies. So that just as our whole being is locally designed to be in a space and time throughout our lives in this finite realm by the soveriegn choice of God , so we are existing in a state of sin and corruption and are subject to dieing. It is equally real that we are in a state of corruption as that we are united to Christ. Does  that go along with what you are saying?
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
8042  Forums / Main Forum / Complete! on: January 10, 2007, 12:34:27 PM
I agree to a certain extent that we are able to count or reckon ourselves dead to sin and alive to God. We really died to sin when we were made completely new in regeneration. We were baptized into His death and we were raised in new ness of life in Him. Being in Him makes us definitively sanctified because we not only died to sin , that is our sin was imputed to His account in our being identified with Him in His death but His active and passive righteousness was imputed to our account in our being raised to new life in Him in being justified. We were declared righteous in a legal sense. But we still have the remnants of sin because we do not do what we want to do. Now instead of sin and righteousness having equal power in us, righteousness rules as we reckon ourselves dead to sin , since Christ has already done all the work in concurring sin in us.
But still we are subject to the pull of sin as if a man were in us tempting us to give into sin. Sin is a metonomy of a man. There is an active principle in us that has power to pull us down. We put sin to death by the Spirit. By giving the Spirit more and more control of our lives we are growing in our sanctification. When we read and meditate on the word the Spirit uses the word to increase our new spiritual desires by using our spiritual senses to apprehend the glory of Christ in our face to face inward renewal. By the process of renewal through the word we are being transformed from one glory to another as we see the face of Christ in the revealing of truth in the word of God.
Once we begin to rejoice in the truth of His word and that revealing we begin to grow in our desires to glorify Him. As we grow in Him , He then becomes our all in all.
At the same time we still have all of the sorrow of this life, and of our humanity, and of our consequences of sin, and our pain. We still are confronted with the reality of our being in a finite state, subject to the pangs of death , the sorrows of the heart and the knowlege of our personal sin. These two experiences are fountianing up in us as we go from one to another in our moment by moment experience. As we increase in our desires for Him, and our understanding increases we begin to experience the heights of joy and praise in an eternal mindset. In that mindset we learn that there are experiences beyond our ability to comprehend. We learn that there is a work of the Spirit that is beyond words. In this frame we are going to be subjected to more sorrow since we are accustomed to experiencing the sealing of the Spirit and the effects of that genuine mystical sense. We are going to feel the pangs of sorrow in a more sensitive way and in that sensitiveness we will become more unfamiliar with sinning since we are becoming what we really are in the full understanding of being in Christ.
8048  Forums / Main Forum / Why Faith Is A Must on: January 09, 2007, 03:36:15 PM
However, i believe the Bible teaches that, despite all this persuasion, God does not cross the line of forcing us to accept Christ. His grace (or undeserved love) and truth, no matter how desirable, are not irresistible.

I guess since we are talking about choice, that when you say that God does not cross the line, you mean that he does not violate our free will? Which makes our choice a self -determined choice. Or you could say that it is choosing for ourselves. Or you are saying that the cause of our choosing is from our self determined choice. Since there cannot be a cause outside of our will , because if there is a cause outside our will then it would persuade us to choose one way or another.
As i have said that unless the will is first in choosing then there is a persuasion that causes us to choose which would violate freedom in how you describe freedom. But pryor to choosing the mind must have a view of the object of choice in order for the will to actually embrace either way. Then the understanding is pryor to the choice also. But what you are saying that in order for there to be a free choice , the will must determine for itself , there must not be a cause outside of itself. So does a person choose to alow the mind to accept the object in order either to accept the message or not? In that case the mind would be the will. Or the understanding would choose pryor to the choice. But really for there to be a choice pryor to the choice of what the minds view of the message is then the mind must have a view of what choice there would be in order for the choice of the mind to choose to view whether to accept the message or not. And since it is absolutely necessary for the mind to view the message before choosing then there is a cause pryor to the choice that effects the choice. So then your view of freedom is questionable since there is a persuasion to choose (the view of the mind) in order for there to be a choice. Do you really believe that in order for the will to be free it must be in a state of absolute equal librium i.e not crossing the line of something or some one causing choice? I can explain further if you want.
8051  Forums / Main Forum / Why Faith Is A Must on: January 08, 2007, 02:20:10 PM
socrates4jesus- Perhaps i cannot understand such people because God has somehow opened my eyes and not opened their eyes. The point at which you and i disagree (and it is OK for us to disagree!) is that i think such people are blind because they don't want to see (and so God does not force them to see) and you, i think, believe they are blind because God has chosen not to give them sight. Yours is an intriguing viewpoint and one i will spend much time considering!

It's like they are brainwashed or insane or completely unable or perhaps unwilling to see the truth.

Thanks for the kind words ,brother.

Either they are able or they are unable. If they are able then there is a possibility they can respond. If they are unable then it is impossible that they can respond. But having a free will in the sense that they are able to choose with each side having no coherecion. i e to either accept salvation or reject salvation and thinking that we are attributing liberty or freedom of choice is really not the paradigm of ability to choose. First choice comes from  desiring one thing over another. In order for there to be an act of the will it must be the actual choosing salvation springing out of  a desire for Christ that comes from the minds view of the excellency of Christ.  The cause of the choice is the new spiritual desires.
I think you are saying that in order for a person to be absolutly free the choice must be made without coersion. This being your definition of freedom of choice. In other words you give the gospel message and then a person has the ability to either reject the message or accept the message. So the person cannot have any pre dispostion to accept the gospel in hearing the message since any pre corhersion is anti freedom of choice. Is this what you are saying ?
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
8052  Forums / Theology Forum / Which One Is The Gift? on: January 05, 2007, 04:09:08 PM
Quote
Quote
"...But because of his great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions—it is by grace you have been saved. And God raised us up with Christ and seated us with him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus, in order that in the coming ages he might show the incomparable riches of his grace, expressed in his kindness to us in Christ Jesus. For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast. For we are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do."
(Ephesians 2:4-10)

Just one of those unanswered questions i still have.  I know that grace means unmerited favor or undeserved love.  What i'm wondering is whether the "gift of God" of which Paul speaks is the faith or the being saved from hell.  I've heard both ideas taught.  I'm wondering what idea is better supported by the context and grammar.
 I believe that since the context is Gods soveriegn election in salvation.  Faith being the agency by which we apprehend salvation and through which we rest in Christ. First unless we know that He is God then we will not trust Him. So we must have a divine knowlege so that faith can apprehend and rest in knowing who He is. We believe in things unseen because God alone has reveal them to us in regeneration.
We have human faith that we exercise on a daily basis. We sit in a chair believing that the chair will hold us up. We use our faith in every relationship , trusting people on different levels , from work relationships to family relationships to trusting strangers. But this kind of faith is not saving faith.  This kind of faith is human faith. This kind of faith is built on knowlege by experience. This kind of trust is really earned by experience. It is a fleeting trust. It is a trust that will only lead us to reject spiritual knowlege. We cannot gain salvation through human faith.
Human faith is very earthy and it is defined by relationships we develope as we live out our lives. It is devoid of any knowlege of God. Human faith is built on how we are affected by others. It is entirely within the paradigm legal relationships. Human faith is entirely built on free will being exercised for self gratification. There is no fear of God before their eyes, so that those who only possess human faith are their own gods. This human faith is totally self absorbed.
Because man in his natural state is in bondage, the human faith leads him to a system of self righteousness. The trust he has in people is built on a system of philosophy and not in the paradigm of supernaturalism and the soveriegn will of God. The moral system of  accountablity is foundational in the paradigm of human faith. The reason is because human faith is birthed in the ocean of corruption in the minds view of the external objects so that it comes out of a state of an inordinate fear of God. So that man in the exercise of human faith in relationships  views the relationships as a presrequesite or a means to obtain satisfaction from our Heavenly Father rather than as a hindrance of a denial of self. What ever comes between God and us is an idol.  
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
8053  Forums / Main Forum / Why Faith Is A Must on: January 05, 2007, 03:26:32 PM
Thanks Soc, I hope you are not through with this discussion. I have just been taking a little break here on the forums but want to keep discussing. By your continued diologue i take it that you still want to discuss. I have been reading some of your other post and i have enjoyed your thinking through these things. This is a breath of fresh air for me since there are many things that need to be said and diologuing is the best way to come to some kind of compromise. I am trying to understand your position on free will. Do you believe that your sin was not a hindrance to your choosing Christ ?  Thanks Brother.
8061  Forums / Main Forum / Why Faith Is A Must on: December 25, 2006, 01:57:48 PM
Quote
Quote
... But again we are really discussing the soveriegnty of God and that aspect of behavior by choice. And since God causes everything, we can conclude that God causes the unbelievers to choose according to the common grace they have in their choices. God is absolutely soveriegn and has decreed what ever comes to pass. So really what keeps an unbeliever from the depths of sin is common grace. It is the cause of all philanthropy. God orders all things so that He gets the glory even if men in the state of unbelief acknowlege it or not.
Yes, i see what you mean, MBG, and your words remind me of the way Steve Brown puts it: "We can only love to the degree we are loved."

To me, it would be insane for me to take God's gift of His Son and the benefit of that gift, which is eternal life, and then thumb my nose at Him by living for sin and not for Him.  The thing is, i once lived in such insanity.  When i first heard the gospel, i accepted it with joy.  I prayed the sinners prayer and knew eternal life was God's gift to me.  I hung out with born again Christians, studied the Bible with them, worshipped with them and sang Christian songs with them.  Then i went off to college and shed my Christianity like it was a coat i no longer needed.  I called myself a Christian but cared not a whip about what God wanted for me.  I lived only for myself.

It took a crisis in my life to bring me back to God, and now i cannot imagine turning from Him and going back to the dark depths again.  So i think to myself, "Why did i care so little about Him then?  Why was i so blind?  What makes the change in my desires now?" I think Paul helps me come closer to understanding myself when i read:

"For Christ's love compels us, because we are convinced that one died for all, and therefore all died. And he died for all, that those who live should no longer live for themselves but for him who died for them and was raised again."
(2 Corinthians 5:14-15)

Funny how the depth of God's love did not dawn on me until He helped me through a low point in my life.   I was helpless and prayed in desperation.  I made a deal with Him that if he'd get me out of my trouble i'd get myself to church.  He did, and i did, and i have not turned back in the last 15 years.

"But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us."
(Romans 5:Cool

I knew the words, but i did not experience them.  I knew that they were true, but i did not trust the truth of those words and let them affect me emotionally.  Jesus might have been the Savior and the Lord to me, but He was not my Savior and my Lord.  That was an important distinction, at least for me.  Realizing that distinction changed my life.  Yes, i must have been insane.  I'm grateful He knew exactly what i needed to draw me closer to Him.

* * *


So, MBG, you would say that i was not really freely choosing God but that His love overwhelmed me to the point that i could do nothing but turn from my sin and turn to Him?  If so, you might have a point there.
Yes i think that you responded to the call of God. At a point and time you were regenerated. The circumstances in our past and how regeneration worked out visibley in our experience are all different. Some people are regenerated at their birth, in infantancy, or as adults. Some people have a profound experience in salvation, some people have a very ordinary experience. Some people do not know when they were saved. The important thing is that we are trusting Christ in the present.
When we are regenerated we are given a new will so that we can respond to the gospel. Our self will is killed, and we are given Gods will. Yet our faculty of will is not elimanted but rather is regenerated. We are the ones who choose to believe, because our new desires cause us to choose Christ, which desires come from a new spiritual knowlege of Christ. We have a new understanding of who Christ is by being able to spiritually view the value of His death and ressurrection. In other words pryor to being regenerated we were only in darkness, but in regeneration the light comes on, the light of the knowlege of God. Once the light comes on then we begin to see, feel , touch, taste , spiritually, so that we embrace Christ and find in Him our all in all. He becomes our only hope.
And yet all of these new desires are spiritual so that we cannot really understand the depth of them and in a mystical sense we cannot explain them as to how they work out. The profound supernatural nature of God dwelling in us by the Holy Spirit in the application of all that we have in our inward experience is beyond words. They begin to deepen in our sanctification but can never really be sastified in this life, but only in our future heavenly abode.
Our spiritual sense being defined by these new desires are were we experience the mystery of supernaturalism. Naturally we do not like to focus on the inward working of the faculties because we are blinded by the physical aspect of seeing feeling touching and so we naturally do not think in terms of spiritual senses. In being carnally effected we live so much in the imagination of what reality exist. We do use all of our physical senses in the out working from our spiritual senses but there is a struggle in this area between accepting that we are physical beings who are effected by the spiritual struggle and embracing the reality of how we are spiritually effected by our physical pains and seeing Christ as being totally man , who identified with us in the physical realm, and on the other hand , we are to struggle with putting our physical appetites under control by meditation in His word and letting the Spirits work illuminate to us individually our expereience in this struggle, in an individual sense , because we all have different weaknesses .
But yet because the physical aspect so often alarms us to our spiritual inward expereince we are to view these inward experiences with the physical aspect as part of the inward spiritual struggle. Because we do not like to admit areas of weakness that are exposed by our physical senses, and being alerted by the physical unless we veiw our emotional state in our inward expereience we really never get to the bottom of our pain. We begin to devalue the mystical and supernatural work, in our carnal disinterest in our mortification. By devaluing the physical senses in our spiritual inward expereince we fail to gain an insight into the freedom we have in Christ in our mortification. Because physically we are weak in the natural outworking.
These experiences of guilt and blame are from not taking a wholistic veiw of the human condition in the physical and spiritual. For example , we begin to pray, now there are weaknesses that we are confronted with both in the physcial senses and the spiritual senses. We are confronted from within and without. We grow weary in prayer because we are phyisically weak not just because we are strugging spiritually. What we need to see is that just as we are using our physical senses for the spiritual exercise of prayer , our Father in heaven stoops down to our level and offers to us these physical attributes of seeing ,touching, feeling, so that in these personifications of attributed faculties to God , He infact undergurds our weak state of our faculties by communicating to us the eternal nature of these faculties so that we are deeply aware of our inward spiritual struggle and His answer to our weak senses by inflaming our desires by that communicated personification. Once we veiw these faculties in and eternal sense we are transformed into His image.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
8062  Forums / Theology Forum / Opening Up on: December 24, 2006, 05:26:58 PM
Quote
Thanks guys. I'm at a point in life where survival is the name of the game. Each person deals with things differently and what gets under one persons skin might seem trivial to another. I'm in a quandry about something akin to "when in Rome do as the romans do". Do I lower my standards/ethics to preserve my health so stress and depression might not abound or do I continue as is and suffer the consequences? I also wonder why I worry about things and get bothered. I thought life would get less burdensome as I grew older. Surprise. I don't know if the thinking is still the same but when it comes to type A and type B personalities I'm looking at being the A kind. Causes conflict which I can swallow but as time has gone on I'm worried about how it's effecting my health in the long run. At this rate living for eternity doesn't look so good.
It sounds like you are starting to greive because of the direction you have been going. I sense that there is some guilt there. Now there are some views in your mind of the future that are extremely scarry and you are perplexed about what to do. You seem to be caught inbetween guilt and fear. We all have some of the greiving to do because we carve out periods in our lives were we alow our thought life to wander off of trusting in Christ. Then we begin to chase our imaginations because instead of thinking Gods thoughts after Him we chase some thing or person. So now there is so much greif there that the depression clouds our view of ourselves under grace. I usually struggle each day with either trusting Christ or trusting myself. When i start to trust myself , i get very busy. But this is a war , and we can start to fight it at any point in our lives. We must begin to ask God to lead us in the rite path. To lead us in a path He wants us to go. When we begin to plead with Him then grace will begin to fill our minds so that we will begin to overcome the  worry about what happens in the future and we will begin to make the bad memories of our youth reasons for glorying in the cross of Christ and rejoicing in His love. The more we meditate on the word the more we will begin to think Gods thoughts after Him, and the landing will be soft in grace as we begin to repent the direction we have taken to grow luke warm in our love for Him.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
8063  Forums / Main Forum / Merry Christmas, My Dear Friends on: December 24, 2006, 03:07:17 PM
Just imagine standing as one of the wise men in the inn where Christ lay in the manger. First it is just glorious to think that God actually entered time and space coming in human flesh. There laying as a babe was the glory of God. The baby was upholding you standing there watching Him. While you are there thinking about the awsomeness of His glory, He is there in the manger reading your thoughts and knowing what your thinking before you think it. And then He lay there perfect in every way. He was absolutely in the will of the Father, enjoying the fruits of that fellowship and ordering all things according to His glory from that manger. Wow, what mystery! what glory, oh the weight of the eternal God rite in front of you, yet His glory was veiled. Merry Christmas.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
8064  Forums / Theology Forum / Opening Up on: December 24, 2006, 02:45:00 PM
I agree with you jlee. It is very helpful to trust someone to listen to us and uphold us. First we are very complex creatures . We have deep emotions, and we are always thinking of something that will either lead to anxiety or will lead to peace and tranquility. There are a thousand avenues of thought in a persons mind and there are just as many intersections. In our culture we are trained to think small thoughts that are insignificant when it comes to closing down the avenues of thoughts that lead to sin and because our thinking is of little consequence we find that our faculties of mind, will and emotion tumultiously out of sinc. In this paradigm we become captives to our imagination. When we imagine ourselves to be at peace having our faculties working in unison but  we are not resting in Christ then we are going to return to our way of shallow thinking.
Yet we must become aware of our tendencies to trust in those thoughts that will lead us into our besetting sins. First we have bent toward a certian way of thinking by our being in state of sin. Because of the complexity of the problem of our minds natural waywardness, we  decieve ourselves into thinking that our problem does not have layers of deception but only that we are unhappy on the surfice and we need to seek a remedy that will give a short term relief. We are always bent toward short term solutions because we are also physically burdened with pain and  by our natural sense we want to live rather than to die. Here the mixture of the physical has a direct effect on the way we think and we naturally want to get the shorterm remedy. Its just like taking medication for our physical pain. We get relief from our pain and in our carnal paradigm we tend to trust in the medication rather than in Him alone. This way of thinking is so engrained in each one of us that it blinds us to really experiencing freedom in Christ by resting in His work alone. The good meds. lead us into imaginative shallow ways of thinking. Instead of seeing Christ in the serpent pole we worship the serpent on the pole.
But the truth is our trust is always mixed with corruption. When we begin to rest in Christ then we even begin to trust that we are resting in Christ by our own trust. So this is were there is more to trusting in Christ than just thinking rite thoughts. There is a sense of Christ that cannot really be explained. There is a spiritual sense in His divine illumination that causes us to not trust in our trusting Him. Because our faith is a gift, then we know that trusting is something that does not come natural to us. The paradigm of trusting then is a supernatural paradigm. So really trusting in Him does not originate from an intellectual paradigm. Even though the mind and the intellectual thoughts are a part of trusting, these do not lead to trusting in Him alone. Intellectually accepting a doctrinal position is just one part of the trusting paradigm. There must be a new will, a new sight , a new hearing, and a new touch. There must be a new man in order for there to be an real spiritual understanding of trusting. 
8072  Forums / Main Forum / Why Faith Is A Must on: December 19, 2006, 01:58:05 PM
Quote
Yes, i think i understand, MBG.  There is no one righteous or good because the standard for righteousness and goodness is Jesus Himself, who was and is perfect.  Even Jesus said, "There is no one good but God alone".

I understand that everything you or i think is tainted by our sinful nature (what popular culture might call our dark side), so that what we think is unselfish and giving love on our part really has some degree of selfishness to it.

So, you are really not saying Christians are good and non-Christians are not, rather, what you are saying is that all Christians and non-Christians (at least to some degree) are really evil.
Unbelievers are not as evil as their potential of evil. There is a difference between murder and just hating someone. The punishment demands are different. On the positive side the rewards for giving 1 million dollars are far greater than giving 10 dollars. And these circumstances involve personal choices that come with reward or punishment. But really what keeps an unbeliever from being the worse that he possibly could be? What makes an unbeliever do good acts of kindness? Well there is a sense in which the rewards or punishment encourage them to act with moral conviction. But again we are really discussing the soveriegnty of God and that aspect of behavior by choice. And since God causes everything , we can conclude that God causes the unbelievers to choose according to the common grace they have in their choices. God is absolutely soveriegn and has decreed what ever comes to pass. So really what keeps an unbeliever from the depths of sin is common grace. It is the cause of all philanthropy. God orders all things so that He gets the glory even if men in the state of unbelief acknowlege it or not.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
8073  Forums / Main Forum / Why Faith Is A Must on: December 19, 2006, 01:13:42 PM
I would not say the Bible teaches that a non-Christian's desires are 100% evil 100% of the time.

\"THERE IS NONE RIGHTEOUS, NOT EVEN ONE;
 11.  THERE IS NONE WHO UNDERSTANDS,
THERE IS NONE WHO SEEKS FOR GOD;
 12.  ALL HAVE TURNED ASIDE, TOGETHER THEY HAVE BECOME USELESS;
THERE IS NONE WHO DOES GOOD,
THERE IS NOT EVEN ONE.\"
 13.  \"THEIR THROAT IS AN OPEN GRAVE,
WITH THEIR TONGUES THEY KEEP DECEIVING,\"
\"THE POISON OF ASPS IS UNDER THEIR LIPS\";
 14.  \"WHOSE MOUTH IS FULL OF CURSING AND BITTERNESS\";
 15.  \"THEIR FEET ARE SWIFT TO SHED BLOOD,
 16.  DESTRUCTION AND MISERY ARE IN THEIR PATHS,
 17.  AND THE PATH OF PEACE THEY HAVE NOT KNOWN.\"
 18.  \"THERE IS NO FEAR OF GOD BEFORE THEIR EYES.\"

Here is the state of men under sin.  Men are corrupted in every area of their being both spirit and body. All of their deeds are only evil continually. Because men do not posses the righteousness of Christ their deeds are evil. All men are not as evil as they could be because there are different levels of sin in a natural way.
Men may do good things in the sense of philantrophy. But spiritually there is no goodness in mens actions because the philantropous acts are from an evil heart. Men being aleinated from God, do acts of goodness in a self righteous way in display of their independence from God. Their deeds are offensive to God because they are done in the spirit of alienation from God to self. Choices come from desires that are from the deepest recesses of the soul. An unbelievers soul is dead to spiritual things and there is no love to God in his heart not having  spiritual affections ,men are void of divine light and life in  soul and mind. An unbelievers freedom to choose is that he can choose what he desires most for himself. In that sense there is a goodness in choosing morally good. And there is a good consequence in choosing or making morally good choices. But every choice is done from an evil desire not being spiritually good. It seems that there is some freedom to choose but really unbelievers are in the state of bondage and from our view point as believers ,their choices are bondage choices.

Even as believers we are still corrupted with sin because we still possess the remnants of sin in our whole being. We are corrupted entirely. The goodness that we have comes from a heart that has been regenerated. The desires that come from our souls are spiritually good desires. There is a spiritual goodness in our personal choices because the desires are our desires , our soul has been transfromed, but because our goodness comes from a corrupted heart the desires are mixed with corruption so that they are unacceptable before the eye of God. We have been imputed with the righteousness of Christ and all our works compared to His accomplished work in His obedience, and death and ressurrection are unacceptable we brought under the light of divine justice. Our goodness is only accepted because we are good because we have Christ goodness to our account. So the above passage even applies to us and we are brought to silence when we see ourselves before the law we see our potential as sinners and we turn to Christ being fully convinced by the law that we possess the above corruption. We are ungodly in ourselves as believers.

No comments:

Post a Comment