Monday, November 9, 2015

5960  Forums / Main Forum / Re: The "Inner Gesture" on: October 25, 2008, 03:11:54 PM
I learned something a long time ago in reading about George Muller. When i was in my twenties that bio had a great effect on my spiritual disciplines. I do not think that we just let things go in our minds. There is really a profound struggle that goes along with our daily spiritual disciplines. He tried to get himself in a frame in which he was happy before he would allow himself to see himself as a sinner or think in terms of what to do in a daily basis. The way he did this was to open Gods word and begin reading it. Then he would begin to pray with the word open, that portion that he had read for that morning. He would draw his pleasure in this way from having fellowship with the Spirit before he would draw some kind of application to himself from the text.

 Over the yrs of my own life this has been my practice in memorizing a couple of scriptures a day and building on that going through the books of the bible mainly the nt. After many yrs then, there was so much memorized that it was impossible for me to go over it in one day. So then the Spirit brings these things up as i go through the day. Or if i am memorizing some verse and then need a cross text. But i think there is this battle that goes on. The word has become like a hammer. It is to be used to kick a bad disposition to the corner so to speak. And it is what determines how we are going to deal with all of the things that come into our lives.

 We are not going to see much help unless we apply ourselves to concentrating and keep driving the word into our minds. It is really hard work.Even tho meditation is repetitive, yet the word is alive. It leads us along in our way of life. It determines what we think about. It opens up our deepest worries. It brings us back to the reality of who we are when we have been rewarded and begin to be tempted to dwell on our own ability. It keeps us from staying in a depressed state  by giving us a hope that is centered in His power over our worry and fret. The word is our protection. I have made it a practice to not move in my daily routine until i am moved by the word. I have found that when i am moved by the word and meditation that the Spirit then excites in me a reminder of a text or speaks to me about a particular thing in my life. I have found that this communication comes when the Spirit warms our hearts to hear a word. I call it speaking peace , a very powerful paradigm of His speaking these practical thought patterns as they apply to my daily routine.   
5963  Forums / Main Forum / Re: The "Inner Gesture" on: October 25, 2008, 05:31:30 AM
There is something we do in trying to explain these terms of how we view reality as if we are teaching ourselves through the teacher. Now i do not doubt that this is from a weak perspective of the importance of being without a specific application of truth to us without first applying ourselves to the general evangelical entire counsel application. There are these temptations to be under the allusion of being in a frame of understanding from this sensitivity in a legal sense in receiving a teaching to hear the voices that do not have their origins from grace. In a sense we are dumb sheep and we follow after some kind of frame of reference in which we have very little perspective , having been used to these short focuses in receiving the teaching under these different frames in our disposition.

    This is not really the historical fashion of what is defined as being under the obligation to receive the teaching in a whole counsel fashion. If we just accept that the whole counsel is all that God requires, then i do not think under further observation of the historical teaching of the whole counsel that we have read from our fathers as if we have the whole understanding of what they were  saying. It is the fashion to receive the word with much rejoicing because in the frame of receiving the word we are receiving it as having the nature of what the teaching is defining so that we are receiving it as if it was gifted to us by His grace. That is, there is a difference between receiving a teaching under the obligation of a legal spirit or nature, and receiving it under the nature of the spirit of grace. So that it would include this divine illumination or having a taste in a complete way of the eternal and invisible understanding of the wholeness of the teaching so that we are receiving it not in the letter but in the Spirit, written on our hearts as if it were with the full understanding as if it was related to the whole of scripture. Its more than just an application but it is a divine light to our understanding in a spiritual wholeness.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
5964  Forums / Prayer Requests / Re: Kenny Kodak on: October 24, 2008, 08:16:02 PM
John has a heart of gold. Praying.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
5965  Forums / Main Forum / Re: The "Inner Gesture" on: October 24, 2008, 07:34:45 PM
TB, There is only really one thing we can trust. I guess that when we are talking about how we determine what the truth is in this world and how we see ourselves in light of that is only limited by the entire counsel of God. Now i think that if we look at this as just an intellectual pursuit and then adding the way we feel about what the truths say to us as if we were putting some of them to be enchained by how our culture determines them, then there is going to be an area where we are unprepared to incorporate a good understanding of His attributes in their application to us. Most of our problems stem from a lack of light that exposes these different dis positional weights of grief that we are confronted with. That is why truth is an active state of reality in which we determine how we see ourselves.

 Now there is freedom in all of these different applications of His attributes to our understanding or the lack thereof. Because in our lack of seeing the wholeness of His word, then still we are under the completeness of His grace. So that we are learning but yet not always understanding fully what the reality is. And in this sense we are more concerned about understanding His attributes than we are about protecting ourselves by ignoring His truth or by not bringing it before our understanding in order to be in grafted with that truth. But we need to see that the word defines what reality is and not our understanding of the word. And in this sense there is an indirect view in this world of all of relationships as it relates to how people accept the truth or reject it. What i am saying here is that the attitude is more important than the outward appearance.

Most of our disagreements with others is how we view the world in this sphere of His entire counsel. And i guess that there is a sense in which men experience a certain form of reality different from other men within the context of this in graftedness that has defined context of life that determines these different realities. And so there is this context in which there is a certain amount of grief that is not dealt with for lack of understanding. Then there is a certain amount of grief that comes as a result of the circumstances one finds himself in. Then there are special seasons of grief that we are required to persevere through in order for us to receive the reward. Then there are griefs that are very hard to deal with, that is there is this grief from inverted anger, or a grief that is brought on by being in the company of fools over a period of time. Now there is no doubt that there are different spiritual strengths here. And this is the practical side of teaching. There is no short cut to learning what to do in a certain situation. Because understanding what to do and having the strength to carry it out are two very different things. This is why strength to accomplish any task is from the reality of the teaching about Him.

I am tired .  I will read yours over again and try to respond more. Its very good.
5970  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Romans and the Flesh Monster. on: October 21, 2008, 02:22:55 PM
I think there is a freedom in Him that is heroic rather than just a purposed moral control . And in this way we are imaginative in how we determine what we are going to know what is true by how we look forward to those eternal affections that are beyond our understanding.  We dwell in a universe where what we want is a measurement that is corrupted and falls short of what His knowledge of us as we are changed into His image in confronting this world and those ideas that are without the necessary power to do one thing to bring us in to the ultimate position of having fellowship with the Father through the Spirit , by the resurrection power our Lord. (Sorry for the run on its spirited) So that He indeed will do unto us more than we could ask and think.

 And in our rejecting every thing that is most cherished in our desiring those things that would capture our desiring the supernatural we are made to see in this eternal world a dwelling that is made without hands and is of a power that is eternal in bringing us to live beyond what we could ask and think. This involves a freedom to have a sanctified imagination. So that everything that works against our desires to long for those things that are eternal are brought on by an unimaginative downward spiral of a false love for an idol. That is what man is in his most natural imaginative state. He has no understanding of the truth of Gods design in this world, what God hates and what God loves.
5977  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Rapture Report on: October 20, 2008, 02:16:49 PM
As a former strict dispensationalist converted to an amillennialist there are a number of reasons other than trying to develop an end time theology by putting together scriptures that contradict other scriptures when putting the test of the truth of dispensationalism.

First God did not start an economy with any difference of the way a man is saved at anytime in the history of redemption.

Second Gods purpose in the working out of redemption was not thwarted by a single event in history or a supposed age period.

The Bible describes the most fundamental truths as the central truths in connecting the doctrines of salvation with the purpose of God from the beginning of time to the end. The coming of Christ is the central purpose of the old testament writings and every event pointed to Him getting the glory as the purpose for the publishing of that event. Gods purpose of the events in history is to glorify Himself and not to create a utopia for man.

Christ coming to earth and living a perfect life then dieing and being raised again and then ascending into heaven are one single accomplishment in describing that salvation to us. It is finished so that all is needed is for Christ to bring everything under His control since no event in anytime after His ascension is the focus of Him being sovereign. All things are given to Him to rule. The next event is when He comes to judge the living and the dead. Christ actually rules in the affairs of men from the begining of time to the end of time. One is looking forward in bringing His first coming and the next is looking backward in the reign of Christ and the final ending of evil and the corruption that remains in the universe.

My argument is that once you start  describing dispensationalism or the seven dispensations of time , and apply that to the doctrine of Gods sovereignty and Gods plan of redemption , you actually are adding ideas that are in conflict with the historical biblical doctrines of grace. I know i know, unless you are trained in the modern day two line theology, calvinism and armininism as those lines.

 I can go on and on about this but this is good for now. At some point like somewhere on this forum in the past i wrote some application but i am going to compare this to the paradigm of unbelief. Not saying that its in that state but more in preparing through rite teaching , the true description of our hope of heaven. Oh those historical boundaries, oh that heavenly worship. The apostles purpose for giving the teaching in the first place. Mr Edwards that post millennial genius put me in a balance. Boy have we no confidence in our understanding of the future. We have lived so short of the required heavenly mindedness of what was taught in the past history of the church. Man centered dispensationalism. I lived it , i know. Mix in a little psychology and it gets dreamy.
ReplyReply Reply with quoteQuote Notify of repliesNotify
5978  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Romans and the Flesh Monster. on: October 20, 2008, 09:37:53 AM
It is an indirect paradigm. There is an evil intention from our trouble, that is, what draws us to an anxious hatred, or that building up into a focus into the reaction of the trouble, so that our sensitivity to the trouble is bringing us down to Satans level. As i have said many times is that our identity in Christ sends him packing. If we are in Christ , then we are shielded from the distemper of his working. So that being in Christ is taking refuge in Him, or being shielded from the enemy. Not only do we have a sense of security, but that protection is shielding our head, that protection is His life opposing death, that process in which we are brought down into his distemper. For whatever controls our thoughts controls our general understanding of the nature of his power and the kind of action that was taken to subdue him as being our identity toward overcoming him in dwelling in Christ. And even when we feel the attack of the Devil, yet this should make us determined to find all of our salvation in Him and not to necessarily find out what his tactics are.

First because even tho Satan is localized, yet he is very cunning and smart. He looks like a friend , or a helper. He comes with part of the truth. This is his way to get us to be in a distemper. So that we will not think that we already stand as a victor in this kind of confidence that it is a matter of time that we will see the final judgment on him. But we will think that this battle is more directed at us for the sake of keeping us in a fog or in a state of distemper. What ever we are facing, whether we feel the pangs of the process of death through fear, anxiety or hatred, yet we know that we fall back on Christ rather than fight in direct combat.

We ask Christ to come to our aid. We seek His face. We draw our present comfort from His word and ways. In longing to be taught then we are being brought along by being confronted with being in the enemies territory. Even tho we face the same distempers as that which is always present before us in this world, yet we are to see that Christ has extended His authority over this paradigm in His secret counsel and in His bringing to bear in the state of our hearts the victory in living this out. What we believe becomes what we are tempered to overcome. And so, it is always that the singers and the musicians were out in front in the march to battle. 
5985  Forums / Theology Forum / Re: Romans and the Flesh Monster. on: October 15, 2008, 05:24:42 PM
When the apostle was talking about the thorn in the flesh it was very personal to him. So much that there was only one enemy that he was faced with and that enemy was himself. He described the battle in Rom about his propensity to covet. Whatever it was about , it drove Him to Christ. And in a sense we all view ourselves with this propensity. Because if it was any other reason to have a problem , it would not be a thorn if we did not have some kind of powerlessness to deal with it. And in this sense it would be as if we were presenting our request before Him in prayer and having an excuse in the form of blaming something else for our pain. I have heard that it was a church, or it was a physical problem. But the apostle does not explain his predicament as he opens himself up as he describes that problem in rom. For what i want to do i do not do. And if it was that we all face this insanity of doing the very thing we condemn in others. It comes from our view of how we see ourselves in light of that besetting sin. If it was a physical thing , then that would be the determining factor of how we react to sin, how we see our described deli ma, that is our state of mind with that problem. So much so , that it still comes back to our general disposition about a problem. And that would be the piercing effect in us. We all have a tendency to have something that is there that makes us change in some way about how we believe when we are confronted with that besetting sin.

If we could control our state of mind, then there would be a long declension toward that in saneness. But most of the time it is something that is set off inside of us. And we like to think that it was some other circumstance or someone in closest to us that gave us this thorn. But what we see in scripture is God bringing about this in Nebuchadnezzar. One day he is in his rite mind and the next day, he is eating grass. That touch of insanity was brought on and was out of his control. It was because of his pride. But who of us is not faced with pride? Who can say that he is not judged as" you are the man." The truth is that if God opened our eyes to the evil that lurks in our hearts and we saw ourselves in light of perfection we would all be eating grass. But we are all given to see ourselves in excusing our propensity to give into the besetting sin and yet hold others to a standard , because we are not feeling that thorn in the present time. And if some of us think that being sane is taking some kind of medication. Then just the very thought of stopping those meds would bring on a deep piercing effect to us of insanity.

But if we were to gain more of an understanding of our lack of believing or our propensity to be a hypocrite It would be to judge ourselves as if we had no problem with a sin that was hard to deal with. So much that even our pride of not having to face some of the besetting sins because of the kinds that require more effort to fall into, yet the pride of believing that we are somehow different than the other guy could be a touch of insanity. I mean, here we have people trying to describe just what grace is, and yet , these same people are facing the chaff of being burned up, that part of their view of God that is not worth us believing that is to be believed. But these people will tell you that they are not describing a false grace or a grace that is a little off and yet their believing that it is pure is itself insanity. Any time grace is impure then it is from the view of hypocrisy.

Its also true in marriage. If any one has been married for any length of time then they will experience the question how can i put up with such mindlessness. And yet, that is exactly what the other partner is saying. I guess that its not really just the cultural norms here. But there is a sense in which our view is determined by our inability to deal with that thorn so that it goes away. And if we view our rightness in measuring ourselves in excusing ourselves then we are dealing with a bit of insanity. But yet we deal with each other in this way. And how much of this view of that thorn is formed in our disposition is in itself a form of walking around in insanity. But we must have some sort of revelation, that which breaks through our in saneness or we will grow bitter and stiff toward life. Even the bible is a mirror to us , and even tho we never quite see the full view of ourselves yet God does give us a certain illumination to what is rite and proper. And He does cause us to not feel the full effects of our chaff. This is what grace does toward sinners. And it is what allows us the freedom to come to terms that we are totally depraved and we are insanely one sided with it comes to seeing ourselves different than we judge others. Here i think is our struggle, that thorn, it is ugly, it is the cause of all of our humbling. We have the propensity to go into our own minds if we are to be humbled for a time. And God does keep us from utterly falling.

No comments:

Post a Comment