Now
as to the spiritual knowledge. There is a factual knowledge about
Christ. We must ascent to these facts in order to claim that we have
apprehended who He is. But facts are not enough yet essential. In other
words if i know something is true about Him then i will believe that it
is who He says He is. But in order for it to be saving it must be mixed
with saving faith. In my natural self i am blind to who Christ is. But
when He brings His divine light .,.. the knowledge of the glory of God
from His word then that intelligence along with the reality ... the
experience of who He is then is implanted in my soul. That word of God
grows into an understanding of Him. He gives me faith in order to
believe in Him. This saving faith is based upon my understanding based
upon my knowledge based upon His nature that has been implanted by His
word. This is the reason that i have saving faith.
MBG:
I
think that i did not give your reply the consideration it deserved, and
i really want to understand how i can know when i am spiritually
discerning or spiritually deceived. So, when you have the time, i'd
like to explore this with you.
I agree that faith is the means
by which you or i put our trust in the facts. Faith, it seems to me, is
believing what one already knows is true, but not the means by which
one receives truth. One might say that it is by faith we believe, but
by some other means we receive.
It's that receiving that i'm
after. I mean, i have no doubt you have a firm faith. I have no doubt
this Michael has a firm faith, too. By faith, you both put your
confidence in what you believe to be the truth. Yet, what both of you
believe cannot possibly be true, for you believe contrary concepts. I
could go on to talk of others i've met who have a firm faith, such as
atheists (who believe God is not real) and Satanists (who believe Satan
is the most powerful and benevolent God) and Jehovah's Witnesses (who
believe Jesus is not God but Michael the Arch Angel.) You and them all
have faith. Yet, faith has not kept all of you from being deceived.
The
question, then, is this: Since it is NOT faith by which we discern (or
receive) truth, then what is the means of obtaining the truth? Now, i
know you say that the truth is given to us by the Holy Spirit. But
giving is not the same as receiving. So, even if it is God who reveals
truth, what is the means by which someone like me can receive what only
He can give?
Let me define these
differences and the kind of faith that we are presenting here. First
because if one embraces something different than the other one then both
of us cannot be describing the same faith. So that we have a
fundamental difference on how we receive the reality of who Christ is.
We are describing two very different concepts of Christ as He is
presented in scripture. I am saying that Christ that i am presenting is
the Christ of scripture. Historically speaking ... i stand on the side
of the reformers.
I know you are trying to say that faith without
works is dead. And i agree. But saving faith will always follow
evangelical obedience. So that you are trying to reverse this... as i am
reading you. You are saying that the work is evidence of saving faith.
But i am saying that not all work is good work. The reason that i am
trying to slow this conversation down is because i want to present
something that is clearly different in the expression of faith before we
move on to discuss what is a good work.
Micheal is saying that the
body and the blood presented in the sacrament is the actual body and
blood of Christ. He is saying that the elements change into this concept
that Christ has said was His body that was taken by the disciples. He
is saying the Priest has the apostolic authority to substantiate the
elements.
He is also saying that this is the only way to receive
salvation... all other authorities are not qualified to infuse
righteousness ... only those men who have been given that authority by
the Pope ... the succession of apostolic authority.
Can we agree on this before i move on to my position and the reason that I believe that it is not the same kind of faith?
No comments:
Post a Comment